Quote:
Originally Posted by Franky
So why not do it right and do a cut&cover (or other shallow tunnelling method) which would have a better result, cost less and cause only slightly more disruption?
The promise of using a TBM is minimal disruption, but it clearly isn't the case here. We're looking at considerable disruption anyway.
|
City council has mandated the team to come out with a cheaper tunnel alternative. (I still don't understand why it's not up to the bidders to decide this)
Threaded Mode