Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir.Humphrey.Appleby
Was the LRT on Carling that was planned with the original core network going to be a supplemental Toronto Transit City style LRT (which for point of clarity we should likely give a different name, like tram or streetcar just to make the debate less confusing), or another option in the core network (180m stations, etc?)
|
Is there enough use of Routes 85 and 101 to warrant higher-order transportation (i.e. more than on-street BRT with priority signals and lanes which I think is currently warranted along the entire length, something like Route 109?)