Quote:
Originally Posted by RePinion
There certainly are checks on their powers (statutory, common law, and constitutional) - many, many checks in fact - but in most cases it is up to the aggrieved individual to ensure that violations of these checks are not tolerated. While this might seem unfair to average citizens who have borne the brunt of police misconduct/abuse, consider that it is really a basic part of participatory democracy, an essential aspect of responsible citizenship.
It might actually be a good idea to talk with the duty sergeant. This will not in any way prejudice your right to bring a complaint against constable Volpe, although it could of course give him advance warning of the likelihood of a complaint being brought.
Ignore the callous but predictible words about the fruitlessness of filing a complaint. There can be serious consequences for constable Volpe, particulary if complaints have successfully been lodged against him in the past.
|
In theory there are checks, but in reality the police do whatever they want. Police operate at arms length from politics and most politicians are reluctant to hold them to account for fear of losing votes. It is almost impossible to get rid of a bad cop. We have experienced that in Hamilton recently through another case that I will not get into.
As for talking to the duty sergeant, that is usually the first line of complaint and they will take complaints from citizens. Thats why I suggested talking to the duty sergeant.
The complaints process is a joke and any police officer will tell you that. Alot of my friends are cops and they never worry about complaints lodged against them. They know it will go nowhere.
When I had my problems a number of years ago, I filed a complaint after the charge was dismissed. I ended up getting an apology, but nothing happened to the officer involved. That officer was actually promoted a few months later.
Threaded Mode