Posted Aug 7, 2008, 6:29 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Seattle, WA/San Francisco, CA/Jackson Hole, WY
Posts: 4,256
|
|
The plan (like most things in SF) should have more "bulk" in general. More housing? Yes, but also more everything. I am certainly okay with some parts of the 3rd St line being non-housing uses - if they allow bulk in other ways. For example, if they want a parcel to remain as "light industrial", it should allow allow for a much taller building than is there now. A large grouping of jobs is just as transit-oriented as a large grouping of residences. Mixing of uses is great, but 3rd St is one stretch that I think we could really add to the City's job base too.
|