HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southeast


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2026, 10:50 PM
atlanta68 atlanta68 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 373
I posted earlier that UA is already receiving more federal money for research than Auburn. AI was talking about the UA System, but did not specify that distinction.

Google AI has this to say:

Bad news
1. The Land-Grant Defense/Ag AdvantageAuburn’s structural advantage is tied to its historical mandate. Massive federal agencies like the Department of Defense (DOD) and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) funnel massive multi-million dollar contracts to institutions with established aerospace, cybersecurity, and agricultural complexes. UA Tuscaloosa does not possess a comparable agricultural extension or a dedicated military engineering wing on the scale of the Samuel Ginn College of Engineering.2. The UA System "Cap"UA Tuscaloosa is intentionally restricted from aggressively expanding into heavy aerospace and medical research because its sister campuses hold those state monopolies:UAB captures the state's federal health/NIH money.UAH sits in Huntsville and captures the massive DOD/NASA aerospace awards.Because UA Tuscaloosa cannot aggressively encroach on UAB and UAH's domains without cannibalizing its own system, it must limit its federal search to environmental sciences (like the Alabama Water Institute), data science, and the humanities. This naturally caps how fast its federal portfolio can expand.

Good news in Scenario B below
🔮 Predictive Scenarios🎯 Scenario A: UA Matches Auburn (Late 2030s – Low Probability)For UA to catch Auburn, it would require Auburn’s engineering and defense portfolio to completely stagnate while UA sustains an aggressive 10–12% year-over-year compound growth rate in federal awards for nearly 15 straight years. This is highly unlikely given Auburn's own Strategic Plan 2035, which explicitly prioritizes doubling its scholarly output and expanding extramural funding.🤝 Scenario B: Joint System Overtake (Already Happening)If the question is framed around when UA researchers will have access to more federal funding than Auburn, the answer is right now—but only when executed through collaborative system grants. By tethering Tuscaloosa's Data Science and Water hubs to UAH's top-tier aerospace/DOD infrastructure and UAB's $700M+ medical empire, then UA System effectively out-competes Auburn on major interdisciplinary federal bids.

David Matthews, the president at UA at the time, oversaw the transfer of the Medical School to UAB in 1969. This one act seriously undermined UA for decades and will contine to make it not impossible, but difficult for UA to overtake Auburn in research expenditures.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southeast
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:09 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.