HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2024, 3:56 AM
llamaorama llamaorama is online now
Unicorn Wizard!
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,283
Nobody is going to ride that Mid-America airport extension. What a giant load of pork.

The North-South line could also work as BRT rather than rail, it has so many stops and is mostly at-grade. They wouldn't really get value out of rail, and BRT would allow other bus routes to trunk onto whatever infrastructure is added.

Instead of spending available federal funds on building new rail lines, has any thought ever been given to improving existing lines by re-routing them, grade separations, eliminating curves, relocating stations whose original sites didn't work out, etc?

Many light rail systems built in the 1990s and 2000s made cost-cutting decisions that reduced potential ridership by making them slower or limit frequency. Some stations were built for bus route connections that don't exist anymore, or were built for some prospective urban development projects or to serve employment centers that don't exist anymore. And then on the flip side, there's opportunities for new infill stations to serve destinations along the route that weren't there when the line opened.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:01 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.