HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2024, 2:16 AM
bodaggin bodaggin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 337
Port of Churchill

I've followed the Churchill story for years. Tons of hype, but the numbers ever added up to me. Everything has been proposed; grain, nat gas, oil, bulk. Even icebreaking LNG ships (1 ship, breaks ice AND carries LNG). But at only 140 ice-free days, it's a tough proposition.

Churchill does compete with Thunder Bay and the terrible St Lawrence Seaway. It shaves off 2000km to Europe and helps western sovereignty from Ottawa.

But building on permafrost, the remoteness, sea ice, a few long winters, etc, really make Churchill a tough sell. That rail line itself has barely stayed alive due to the tundra. And 250km of no road. Port Nelson has no infrastructure either.

What does everyone think about the Northern Ports? What number of ice-free days tilts the scales in their favor? As always, numbers matter. So I'm posting 2021 shipping costs per ton-mile by mode for consideration. Every port transfer increases costs dramatically.

Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:19 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.