HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Feb 23, 2024, 6:27 PM
nomarandlee's Avatar
nomarandlee nomarandlee is offline
My Mind Has Left My Body
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,636
Quote:
Originally Posted by moorhosj1 View Post
The White Sox have hit 2 million ONCE in the past decade. There are only going to be 2 expansion opportunities, in order to bring MLB to 32 total teams. That means that a few cities will be left out.

If we look at the four cities below, none of them are over-saturated with pro sports teams. They each have fewer than 3 of the 4 majors (NHL, MLB, NBA, NFL).

As far as fan interest, the White Sox averaged 20,500 fans in 2023. Here is average 2023 attendance for MLS teams in the possible cities.

Nashville - 28,250
Charlotte - 35,500
Salt Lake - 19,500
Portland - 23,000
Montreal - 16,000
Austin - 20,750
While there are no hard and fast rules for the pro-sports market saturation, I'd argue very generally that metros under 3 million having three, or all four, of the pro-sports leagues is really pushing residents' allocated sports entertainment dollars to their limits.

Nashville (Preds and Titans) and Charlotte (Panthers and Bobcats) are home to two pro franchises already. Granted, both metros project to have continued strong population growth in the next few decades.

I think Austin, the largest metro without a pro team, is due a team of some sort. MLB will not really encroach on the UofT programs like a pro-NFL team would, and it has gained a strong corporate tech presence that should bolster sponsorship advertising, etc.

Quote:
OrdoSeclorum
Exactly. Anyone who says "The city should spend exactly $0.00..." Simply isn't a serious person.
I am absolutely in agreement. No sports team should get a dollar for these stadiums. We should already have laws prohibiting as much.

That said, I am also a realist, and I know that nearly all MLB teams have received either infrastructure subsidies at the minimum (SF Giants) or, in many more cases in MLB, upwards of half or more of the stadium cost. I hope this ends up with more of a Giants model where most of the stadium itself was privately funded, given that is probably the best-case scenario while making the 78 ballparks happen and retaining the Sox. I have no issue with letting the Sox walk, though, if the residents and politicians finally decide enough is enough. In fact, nothing would make me prouder.

Last edited by nomarandlee; Feb 23, 2024 at 9:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:30 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.