Posted Jan 30, 2024, 6:32 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hamilton/Dresden
Posts: 1,859
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFUVancouver
The only logical way a private operator should be considered is if the entire project delivery is structured around a design-co-finance-build-operate-maintain P3 model (i.e. the Canada Line) with the many lessons learned from that project incorporate into the contract.
To be clear, you don't add a profit-seeking partner to public transit without a really good reason.
Not having experience running a train (a bit rich for a system with 'railway' in its name, incidentally) is not a good enough reason to do a P3.
Not knowing how to build one could be a good reason, but, fortunately, Hamilton isn't building the thing. Metrolinx is. And they've done this before, so no P3 is needed.
A major funding shortfall is a good reason, and the City sure couldn't afford this on its own dime, but the Province is picking up the tab, so no P3 is needed.
|
I don't really have a lot of confidence in the HSR.
"To be clear, you don't add a profit-seeking partner to public transit without a really good reason."
I don't think that's much of an argument. Public sector productivity is poor. I don't think we want more of it.
|