HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Dec 21, 2023, 12:09 AM
jd3189's Avatar
jd3189 jd3189 is offline
An Optimistic Realist
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA / West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 6,704
Honestly, I don't see cars are necessarily bad for the urban form. It's really building the urban form to accommodate cars over buses, trains, bikes, and people that's the problem.

Living in LA, I do still use my car, but it's more of a choice now rather than something I need for daily activities. I live within walking distance of my job and a Metro station, so I only drive for leisure and getting groceries.

I couldn't do that in the IE, let alone newer car centric development where you have a bunch of SFHs in a cul-de-sac on one plot of land adjacent to a commercial area with a shit ton of parking lots, stroads, etc. That postwar layout is extremely hostile to walking and anything else that's not a car.

There has to be some sort of balance and the interwar urbanism provides that balance, in my opinion. We ain't getting rid of the automobile, but it doesn't need to be the only way to get around in the majority of our country. Even in NYC with the highest percentage of car-less households you still have a strong car culture among folks who hate that one lane of traffic on a street is being converted to a bike lane.
__________________
MAWA: Make America Walkable Again
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:05 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.