Quote:
Originally Posted by Spr0ckets
Which would make this REVS closure an even bigger selling point for Concord's Oasis down the road.
If you're a big fan of bowling, it seems like bowling lanes come as a premium for Concord's buyers in their developments.
Ironically, if these are more common in developments as officedweller suggests, it might partially explain why Bowling lanes in general as (public) recreational spots are dying out in Burnaby, since they might be losing some of their customers to these developments.
Obviously not the same without the character and ambience of public alley and all, but if you're already paying for it in your strata and amenity fees, then why bother driving out to go to commerical lanes?
|
Because a public alley is a public place where anyone can go to bowl with their friends?
Plus, not everyone's going to buy a condo just so they can bowl every so often.
It seems like anything that requires a lot of land in Vancouver nowadays seems to need to either be protected, or otherwise it gets redeveloped. If this was Vancouver, they'd probably demand the site have a public bowling alley.
IMO, if we're letting IKEA, dealerships, self-storage, and art/film studios use industrial lots, then we should let bowling alleys use industrial lots too.
Half of the bowling alleys we have are in industrial sites anyways.