HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Business, Politics & the Economy


View Poll Results: Who should be the next mayor of Ottawa?
Mark Sutcliffe 8 15.38%
Catherine McKenney 43 82.69%
Bob Chiarelli 1 1.92%
Other 0 0%
Voters: 52. You may not vote on this poll

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #361  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2022, 12:08 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 27,631
A reminder that this is just one of many sketchy things he did. He also attended a Zoom meeting while driving, while on his cell phone. He ended up going to the police to get fiend, but of course that was just a PR stunt, likely ordered by Watson. He got the bare minimum for one offence even though he was committing multiple. He's also generally a bully on Council.

Quote:
Osgoode couple drops lawsuit against Coun. George Darouze

The lawsuit had been filed in 2020 following an integrity commissioner conduct investigation a year earlier.

Jon Willing, Ottawa Citizen
August 11, 2022


A couple who sued Osgoode Coun. George Darouze following an integrity investigation into bullying is dropping the lawsuit after realizing that a trial would chew up more time and money than they’re willing to spend.

Kristen and Reinhard Lechleitner sued Darouze for $32,500 in June 2020 after feeling unsatisfied with how the integrity process ended.

The legal drama ends just months before residents in Osgoode ward decide who should represent them for the 2022-2026 term of Ottawa’s city council. Darouze is seeking a third mandate.

Continuing with the lawsuit wasn’t worth the time, stress and potential cost associated with a trial, Kristen Lechleitner said.

She is an operating-room nurse who also works with Indigenous Services Canada, serving remote communities in Northern Ontario, and Reinhard Lechleitner is a constable with the Ottawa Police Service.

Kristen Lechleitner said they were prepared to settle, but Darouze wanted to take the claim to trial.

Darouze didn’t return a request for comment on Thursday. His lawyer, J.F. Lalonde, confirmed that a judge endorsed the discontinuance of the claim.

Former integrity commissioner Robert Marleau launched a conduct investigation in 2019 after learning Darouze emailed the chief of police, who was Charles Bordeleau at the time, to complain about social media posts by an officer’s wife criticizing police deployment decisions in the Osgoode area.

The police chief ran Darouze’s complaint down the ranks for an assessment and an inspector and staff sergeant found that the observations in the Facebook posts by Kristen Lechleitner were accurate. The senior officers notified Reinhard Lechleitner, who just then learned about the posts, and assured him no action would be taken by the police force.

In the report summarizing his conduct investigation, Marleau wrote, “the major motivation of the councillor was to bully and intimidate” the Lechleitners “in the hope that female complainant might cease her critical Facebook commentary of him.”

Marleau didn’t call for a financial penalty to be levelled against Darouze, but he recommended that council reprimand the councillor and that Darouze issue a sincere written apology to the Lechleitners. Marleau also recommended that council direct Darouze to ask the police chief to remove the councillor’s email from Reinhard Lechleitner’s personnel file.

On Sept. 25, 2019, council received and carried Marleau’s recommendations without discussion.

Kristen Lechleitner attended the council meeting to watch how the mayor and councillors responded to the integrity report.

“I was angry,” she said Thursday. “They did nothing.”

The Lechleitners filed their lawsuit against Darouze in small claims court. The couple landed on damages of $30,000 in recognition of the penalties the integrity commissioner had available in making a recommendation to council on penalties. The maximum penalty for a conduct violation is a 90-day salary suspension.

The Lechleitners also weren’t satisfied with Darouze’s apology, particularly a part that said, “I have learned that you perceived my actions to be harassing and for that I am truly sorry.”

In the court file, Darouze’s defence document, dated January 2021, alleged that he had been the subject of defamatory remarks on social media made by Kristen Lechleitner.

In his defence, Darouze said he fulfilled the recommendations in the integrity commissioner’s report, including asking Interim Police Chief Steve Bell to remove his email from Reinhard Lechleitner’s file and writing an apology to the Lechleitners.

Darouze argued that the Lechleitners didn’t suffer damages and he asked the court to dismiss the lawsuit.

The most recent settlement conference happened last week, leading to the Lechleitners’ decision to end their lawsuit.

The Lechleitners weren’t represented by a lawyer during the court case.

Reinhard Lechleitner said they proceeded with the lawsuit because they believed the action was on good legal footing, not because they had “hurt feelings” over Darouze’s conduct.

that property taxpayers could be on the hook for any damages ordered by the court if Darouze was ordered to pay.

The City of Ottawa wasn’t a named defendant in the lawsuit.

Osgoode ward has become one of the hot races to watch ahead of the Oct. 24 municipal election.

One of Darouze’s challengers is Doug Thompson, a former councillor and the last mayor of Osgoode Township, who endorsed Darouze in the 2014 municipal election. Their soured relationship became city hall scuttlebutt after Darouze’s election, and now Thompson wants to reclaim the seat.

But Darouze has eight years of experience on council and has served as deputy mayor in the current term. He won 54 per cent of votes in the 2018 municipal election in a five-candidate race in Osgoode ward.

As of Thursday, other candidates running for the Osgoode seat in 2022 included Dan O’Brien and Bob Masaro.

Kristen Lechleitner, who considered running for the seat, said she was volunteering on Thompson’s campaign.
https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local...george-darouze
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #362  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2022, 12:10 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 27,631
In other news, it looks like the Roget's debates are being recorded. Luloff posted on Facebook after completing his. Should be up soon.

Wonder who the new moderator will be with Sutcliff now running for Mayor.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #363  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2022, 12:31 PM
Williamoforange's Avatar
Williamoforange Williamoforange is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 833
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
In other news, it looks like the Roget's debates are being recorded. Luloff posted on Facebook after completing his. Should be up soon.

Wonder who the new moderator will be with Sutcliff now running for Mayor.
The Rogers debate looks like it will be hosted by Derick fage, he asked for question a week ago. 3rd party advertiser Horizon Ottawa chimed in, and apparently they are also tabling at the eco debates, which says a lot about those debates partisanship.

https://mobile.twitter.com/DerickFag...88322184450048
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #364  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2022, 5:28 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 27,631
Some drama today.

Quote:
BOB CHIARELLI ACCUSES SUTCLIFFE CAMPAIGN OF ‘DIRTY TRICK’
CTV NEWS OTTAWA DIGITAL MULTI-SKILLED JOURNALIST
Michael Woods


Ottawa mayoral candidate Bob Chiarelli is accusing the Mark Sutcliffe campaign of spreading rumours that Chiarelli would drop out of the mayors’ race before the deadline last month.

The move was a “specific strategy” and a “dirty trick” designed to hamper the Chiarelli campaign’s fundraising efforts, the former Ottawa mayor and regional chair told Newstalk 580 CFRA.

It’s the latest example of the Ottawa mayoral race heating up with election day less than two months away.

Chiarelli made the allegation after host Graham Richardson asked him whether he would see the race through to Election Day.

“With all due respect, that’s a ridiculous question,” Chiarelli said. “I’m nominated, I’m registered … how could anyone suggest or feel that I’m going to be dropping out?”

Chiarelli announced his intention to run for mayor in December and filed nomination papers on the earliest possible day, which was May 2. Sutcliffe entered the race in late June.

The deadline to register for the municipal election was Aug. 19.

Chiarelli said before then, a “very, very senior person” in the Sutcliffe campaign approached a current councillor and several community newspapers and told them Chiarelli would drop out.

“It was a strategy of the Sutcliffe campaign to tell people that I was going to withdraw before the deadline,” he added.

“They tried to blunt our fundraising, and it was a dirty trick. And we worked through it, we didn’t make any issue of it at the time,” he said. “But we had to do some convincing to tell people 'No, we’re serious, we’re going to be there on Election Day.'"

Chiarelli also took aim squarely at Sutcliffe’s candidacy, calling him “Watson 2.0,” as well as Catherine McKenney’s campaign.

“You want to pay higher municipal taxes? Vote for Catherine McKenney,” he said. “If you like the current council, if you want the status quo, vote for Watson 2.0 Mark Sutcliffe, a candidate personally chosen by the mayor.”

The perceived mayoral frontrunners have started to target each other directly with fewer than eight weeks remaining until election day on Oct. 24. This week, the Sutcliffe team has gone after McKenney, accusing them of flip-flopping on the issue of free transit.

In response, McKenney said they want to see transit fares eliminated in Ottawa eventually, but clarified it’s a long-term goal and never said that they would bring in free transit overnight.
https://www.iheartradio.ca/580-cfra/...ick-1.18447120
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #365  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2022, 5:29 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 27,631
Also:

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #366  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2022, 5:43 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 27,631
Quote:
Graham Richardson
@grahamctv
.

@Bob_Chiarelli
blasts me for asking a “ridiculous” question on
@CFRAOttawa
just now. I asked if he was going to drop out. Says that was a “dirty trick” planted by
@_MarkSutcliffe
campaign who he says is “Watson 2.0”…things are heating up #ottnews #ottawa
11:03 AM · Sep 1, 2022·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/grahamctv/status...hbrZ1EmFw&s=33

Interview with Graham Richardson: https://www.iheartradio.ca/580-cfra/...6?mode=Article

He loves mentioning the bare-bones 2001 O-Train project as if that's the same as a $2.2+ Billion metro line.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #367  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2022, 6:21 PM
originalmuffins originalmuffins is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 877
Just got my letter, hoping for a progressive and more transit oriented interconnected city regardless of who gets in, hopefully we can get stage 3 funding out of the way so they can get shovels in the ground.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #368  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2022, 6:30 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 27,631
And now this.

Quote:
Graham Richardson
@grahamctv

.
@_MarkSutcliffe
to me just now “I have no idea what Bob is talking about”
1:51 PM · Sep 1, 2022·Twitter for iPhone
If Bob's accusations are true, that's pretty bad, but I don't think Sutcliff is that kind of guy. That's seems like a strategy for a long time politicians, not a community builder like Sutcliffe.

I think Bob is just kind of losing it. He's not ready for a third major defeat.

At this point, Chiarelli stilll has no chance of getting my vote. Old ideas talking about freezing taxes, finding "efficiencies" (code word for blind cuts all-around) and fixing roads. Some on Sutcliffe's list of supporters is concerning me. I continue to lean towards McKenney. Certainly don't agree with everything on their platform, but certainly the candidate who will likely get us closer to a City where the car is not the only option.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #369  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2022, 6:50 PM
Williamoforange's Avatar
Williamoforange Williamoforange is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 833
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
And now this.



If Bob's accusations are true, that's pretty bad, but I don't think Sutcliff is that kind of guy. That's seems like a strategy for a long time politicians, not a community builder like Sutcliffe.

I think Bob is just kind of losing it. He's not ready for a third major defeat.

At this point, Chiarelli stilll has no chance of getting my vote. Old ideas talking about freezing taxes, finding "efficiencies" (code word for blind cuts all-around) and fixing roads. Some on Sutcliffe's list of supporters is concerning me. I continue to lean towards McKenney. Certainly don't agree with everything on their platform, but certainly the candidate who will likely get us closer to a City where the car is not the only option.
AFAIK, Chiarelli isn't entirely out to lunch on this claim, (though he is one many others) as it was a bigger name stating that Chiarelli would drop out but it was an opinion and not on behalf of Sutcliffe campaign... Also that allegation came out like a month ago....

As for campaign supporters, you've got a 3rd party advertiser Horizon Ottawa, and Clive Doucet supporting McKenney. So there's baggage all around. As it stands there's no "right" wing candidate (maybe Chiarelli) so Sutcliffe is the only real choice and McKenney is the only left wing candidate so...

Like seriously, Gilbert/Horizon is a response to Sutcliffe saying Ottawa has to stop blocking housing, Doucet is well just his standard nimbyism.

https://mobile.twitter.com/CliveDouc...46350855172096

https://mobile.twitter.com/smwgilber...53634964930561
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #370  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2022, 7:05 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 27,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by Williamoforange View Post
AFAIK, Chiarelli isn't entirely out to lunch on this claim, (though he is one many others) as it was a bigger name stating that Chiarelli would drop out but it was an opinion and not on behalf of Sutcliffe campaign... Also that allegation came out like a month ago....

As for campaign supporters, you've got a 3rd party advertiser Horizon Ottawa, and Clive Doucet supporting McKenney. So there's baggage all around. As it stands there's no "right" wing candidate (maybe Chiarelli) so Sutcliffe is the only real choice and McKenney is the only left wing candidate so...

Like seriously, Gilbert/Horizon is a response to Sutcliffe saying Ottawa has to stop blocking housing, Doucet is well just his standard nimbyism.

https://mobile.twitter.com/CliveDouc...46350855172096

https://mobile.twitter.com/smwgilber...53634964930561
Chiarelli mentioned a "big name" too, but did not specify. Who was it.

Clive is bonkers out of touch with reality. His conspiracy theories about the Civic Hospital and his tweet about Paris. Does he not realize that they razed the City to build block upon block of the same 6 storey building? That was 60s-70s style urban renewal in the 19th Century. Is that was he's calling for?

And yes, I'm pretty tired of many left leaning community members painting all developers as evil doers only in it for the money. We need developers to build housing. That's how society works.

That said, although McKenney is supported by some off-the-wall people, and they have voted against certain projects (such as the Civic) that really should get built, I've never had the feeling that they are a conspiracy nut with extreme views (nothing over 6 floors Doucet). A bit too much to the left, but not overly.

It all depends on our priorities. I think both McKenney and Sutcliffe offer realistic, relatively forward thinking visions for the City. I'm still not decided, but lean towards McKenney. If they call for the cancelation of the Civic (one thing voting against it, and another to go out of your way to kill it) or something extreme in that direction, then I'll reconsider. Same with Sutcliffe; if he only talks about widening roads but does not offer any ideas in terms of improving transit (and not just "fixing", whatever that means) or expanding the cycling network, then that could make my decision a little easier.

But Bob, he's just stuck in the 90s and 2000s. Roads, roads, roads. Sprawl, sprawl, sprawl. He hasn't made a single announcement that appeals to me.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #371  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2022, 9:18 PM
YOWetal YOWetal is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,422
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
And now this.



If Bob's accusations are true, that's pretty bad, but I don't think Sutcliff is that kind of guy. That's seems like a strategy for a long time politicians, not a community builder like Sutcliffe.

I think Bob is just kind of losing it. He's not ready for a third major defeat.

At this point, Chiarelli stilll has no chance of getting my vote. Old ideas talking about freezing taxes, finding "efficiencies" (code word for blind cuts all-around) and fixing roads. Some on Sutcliffe's list of supporters is concerning me. I continue to lean towards McKenney. Certainly don't agree with everything on their platform, but certainly the candidate who will likely get us closer to a City where the car is not the only option.
McKenney for sure is the best bet for that. I guess the other two are both centrist? Though the Baird endorsement has to be a bit scary for actual centrists who think McKenny is too far left. It is interesting she might be able to split the vote and win this thing. Combined with the strong mayor we could see some real progress with only 40% of councilors.

I'm still conflicted as I'd go for a big bold progressive mayor with ideas like real transit priority and maybe congestion type charge. If not directly than with major increase in parking costs downtown. But I tend to think McKenney is more passive and the send more money to social services subsidized housing and the like rather than a real progressive vision on the big things or any new culture money.

If it's a status quo I'd probably go with Chiarelli who at least has some experience.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #372  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2022, 9:39 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is online now
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,198
It's not about what Ottawa's mayoral candidates promise. It's about how they'll deliver

Mohammed Adam, Ottawa Citizen
Sep 01, 2022 • 9 hours ago • 3 minute read


After this Labour Day weekend, the municipal election campaign enters the decisive final stretch. With the holidays largely over, and the kids back in school, there is time to focus on the most important city election in a decade.

We are not only electing a new mayor, but nearly half of council, and this should be enough motivation to pay attention to this pivotal campaign, and what the candidates are promising. There are 14 mayoral candidates, but we should really focus on the top three: Catherine McKenney, Mark Sutcliffe and Bob Chiarelli, one of whom will quite likely become mayor.

Some of the candidates have been releasing bits of their platforms: Chiarelli on taxes and finance, and Sutcliffe on the environment. They have given us important issues to debate, but one key missing ingredient is the “how.”

How they will do what they promise, and how they will pay for it, is fundamental to public acceptance of the candidates’ plans. As the full platforms are released in the weeks head, the “how” is what we should be demanding. We should not accept big promises that look good on paper but are not accompanied by a detailed implementation plan. We want plans that are practical and doable, not wishlists.

The name of the game for voters should be detail, detail, detail; and at every step of the way, we should apply common sense to every promise: Is it real or too good to be true?

Take some of what we’ve heard so far. Sutcliffe’s environmental plan is really a good read, but can all of it be done? Among the highlights, Sutcliffe would plant 250,000 trees every year, one million over the course of his four-year term. He would have more charging stations for electric vehicles, stop buying single-use plastics and transition the city’s gas-powered fleet to fully electric or hybrid by 2030. “We need to be bold and we need to be ambitious because we want a cleaner and greener city, and that’s what people expect,” he says.

No quarrel with that. But for someone promising to run a tight ship, it remains unclear how he is going to implement these many ideas. As one astute Citizen reader recently pointed out, the city has planted an average 92,500 trees under the Green Acres Restoration program since 2000. So, how can Sutcliffe hit 250,000 a year? How would he do it and how much would it cost? Who would pay? Perhaps, the details will come, but we need to keep pressing for them, whoever the candidate.

The same goes for Chiarelli’s tax and financial plan, an analysis of which has been done in these pages. It’s a good plan that hits all the right notes on paper, but the “how” remains to be fully detailed.

Every candidate’s plan should be subjected to this important scrutiny because many candidates are untested, with thin records to use as a barometer of success or failure — unlike outgoing Mayor Jim Watson, or Larry O’Brien before him. Chiarelli may be an exception because he has been mayor once. But that was 16 years ago. Ottawa is not the same city it was then, and it remains to be seen if his record still has emotional resonance.

McKenney (who uses the pronouns they/them) is a two-term councillor with a high profile. And while no one will deny they are hard-working, being mayor is a completely different animal. It’s the same with Sutcliffe. He is a certainly a fresh face with no political baggage, and has private-sector experience to bring to the job. His lack of political experience could be an asset, but also could be a liability. As things stand, there is just no telling what kind of mayor these candidates would be.

That’s why the only way to properly judge them is to focus not only on what they promise, but more importantly, how they plan to keep those promises in their four-year term. It’s not about what they aspire to, but what they would do in real time, and how. In this election, nothing matters more.

Mohammed Adam is an Ottawa journalist and commentator.

https://ottawacitizen.com/opinion/ad...theyll-deliver
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #373  
Old Posted Sep 2, 2022, 2:58 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 27,631
I'm not in agreement with raising the police budget. More money to the cops doesn't reduce crime. Police are reactive. A crime happens, then they show up. Whether or not they do something about it again not related to the budget (ex. the "Freedom Convoy").

That said, I agree with opening a small detachment in the Byward Market. More police won't prevent crime, but having a continued presence might dissuade crime.

What we need to do is remove remedial tasks from the hands of the police such as traffic control (construction sites, traffic lights that are out) and security at sports events.

Quote:
Sutcliffe would increase police budget, open station in ByWard Market

Michael Woods
CTV News Ottawa Digital Multi-Skilled Journalist
Graham Richardson
CTV News Ottawa Anchor, News at Six
September 1, 2022


Mark Sutcliffe would hire more police officers, open a new station in the ByWard Market and push to install CCTV cameras in an effort to deter crime, the mayoral candidate said Thursday.

“I'm not going to cut police services when people are worried about crime and safety,” he told CTV News on Thursday ahead of announcing his platform on policing. “The police budget needs to grow, not shrink.”

Sutcliffe’s plan includes opening a community resource centre in the ByWard Market and adding 100 more positions over four years to address violence against women, hate and bias crime, and gun violence.


"The police budget has shrunk as a percentage of the city budget over the last few years. the city is growing, we are not going to be able to keep the city safe, with the police budget frozen,” he said.

He is also specifically targeting Coun. Catherine McKenney, calling them “radical change” and a supporter of defunding the police.

“I think it’s a choice between me and Catherine McKenney in this election,” he said. “Catherine is a supporter of defunding the police, now they're backing away from that because they know they can't get elected that way.”

In a statement to CTV News, McKenney suggested their focus as mayor would be to rebuild the public's trust in police following the 'Freedom Convoy' occupation earlier this year.

"Everyone in our city needs to have confidence in our police's ability to keep us safe," they said. "As mayor, I will work with the new Police Chief to get us there. After a year of unprecedented tumult in our city during the convoy, we need to do the hard work of rebuilding trust and reassessing priorities."

"When the City of Ottawa invests hundreds of millions per year in any area, citizens want to see clear evidence that those funds are being spent sensibly.”

McKenney also called on the city's Police Services Board hold off on hiring a new Ottawa police chief until after the Oct. 24 election. The board is currently undertaking a search for Ottawa’s new top cop.

“This is a time for renewal for the City and for the Police,” they wrote in a letter to the Police Services Board. “I ask that you allow the new Council and new PSB to choose the Chief who will lead that renewal."

The police services board came under scrutiny during the 'Freedom Convoy' protests, when the city's former police chief Peter Sloly resigned during the three-week occupation of the city's downtown core. Many of its members resigned during and after the protest.

Along with the mini police station in the ByWard Market, Sutcliffe says he supports the “target, limited use” of CCTV cameras in at-risk areas for “investigative and deterrence purposes.” In 2019, Mayor Jim Watson asked city staff to study the effectiveness of such cameras after a string of shootings in the Market.

Sutcliffe is also pledging to strike a task force within 30 days of taking office to seek recommendations on dealing with mental illness and substance abuse.

He says he would hire more paramedics with funding from the province, tackle homelessness by move away from emergency shelters in favour of supportive housing, and expand the city’s anti-racism strategy.
https://ottawa.ctvnews.ca/sutcliffe-...rket-1.6052089
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #374  
Old Posted Sep 2, 2022, 5:56 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 27,631
Rogers TV debates are going up on YouTube. Here's the link to their video list:

https://www.youtube.com/c/ROGERStvofficial/videos

I encourage you to check out your ward's debate if/when it's up. They are also posting "exit interviews" with outgoing Council members, including Watson.

And the latest mayoral debate:

Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #375  
Old Posted Sep 2, 2022, 7:56 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 27,631
Keith Egli interview I thought was really good. Sad to lose him.

Video Link


But Watson... Apparently he was able to get from his home in Carlingwood to St. Laurent and back, on transit, within 25 minutes. Can barely make it from Tunney's to St. Laurent in 25 minutes.

He then uses the excuse that no one in recent years has built-up a light-rail system in a built up area. What? What we're building is no different than the Skytrain, the REM, Edmonton and Calgary's LRTs, Europe, Asia..? And honestly, other than the tunnel, Stage 1 was not in a built-up area, it was using an existing busway, which is much easier. than many other projects in Canada and the world.

Really just trying to find excuses, still.

Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #376  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2022, 5:03 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is online now
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,198
Uncivil discourse: Pressure on city council has never been as high
'It was like nothing I had ever experienced in my life,' says outgoing councillor

Joanne Chianello · CBC News
Posted: Sep 06, 2022 4:00 AM ET | Last Updated: 6 hours ago


No one expects to be called a murderer when they take their dog out for a walk.

As the chair of Ottawa's board of health and the city's political liaison for Ottawa Public Health's strategy to cope with COVID-19, Keith Egli was in back-to-back meetings from morning to night, seven days a week.

He rarely ate with his wife, even though they were both working from their home in Nepean.

"It was like nothing I had ever experienced in my life," said the outgoing councillor for Knoxdale-Merivale.

One evening, Egli took his pandemic puppy Archie for his usual after-dinner walk in a park.

"Somebody started screaming and yelling at me from the top of the toboggan hill that I was killing people and I was a murderer," he told CBC.

"You don't sign up for that."

More than 120 people have signed up to put their names on the ballots for the Oct. 24 municipal election for a seat around the council table.

But almost half the current council is walking away from a job that many say has never been harder.

This council has dealt with a barrage of challenges, from fatal crashes to destructive storms and floods, a faltering LRT that led to two derailments and a provincial inquiry, to bras being hung on trees in protest of harassment allegations against a veteran councillor.

A big part of being in public life is to expect the unexpected. But at the start of this term of council, municipal politicians could never have anticipated a mysterious new virus that would require the city to enforce stay-at-home orders or mandates that employees get a vaccine to keep their jobs.

And they weren't prepared for the public's response, particularly the anger directed at local officials that ultimately manifested itself physically as a three-week truck occupation that distressed many downtown residents and kept businesses shuttered.

The fallout from those extraordinary events raised the external pressure on city council this term to a new high.

But inside city hall, civil discourse was also under stress. The pandemic strained personal relations, but some believe there were already cracks in the culture of council.

CBC spoke with six council members — including Mayor Jim Watson — who aren't running again to understand what it's been like to hold office these last four years.

On this one thing, they all agree: It hasn't been easy.

Mathieu Fleury was only 24 when he was first elected in 2010, full of Obama-fuelled hope for change.

As the councillor for a downtown ward, he's had his hands full: shootings and fires, the controversial Salvation Army shelter complex slated for the Vanier neighbourhood and the much-maligned addition of the historic Château Laurier hotel.

"I'm used to being in very tense meetings," he said.

But during the convoy protests, which kept people in their homes and workers from their jobs — "Only residents of Ottawa can understand having the Rideau Centre closed 23 days in a row," he said — a line was crossed.

"If people show up at my house, and threaten me or my family, it has impacts," Fleury told CBC.

"I understand the responsibilities of office. But my family didn't call for that. My neighbours didn't call for that. My team members didn't call for that. So that when the threats go beyond a tweet … and folks show up at your home, you say 'OK, what's going on?'"

When asked if he and his family had to leave their home during that time, he nods, but doesn't elaborate.

He doesn't want pity or to scare people from participating in public life, he said.

Still, he's worried.

"Political and public life has really become challenging," he said. "We have to find a way to talk about democracy, about civility, respect."

The abuse that poured in during the convoy was like nothing anyone had ever seen. Councillors received emails with subject lines like "A bullet in your head."

Outgoing council members worry the rage directed at them may stop people from running for public office. And it's one of the reasons they haven't spoken in more detail about these threats before.

Mayor Jim Watson has been a target of homophobic slurs since coming out as gay in 2019. During the last several years, two people have been charged with uttering death threats against him.

"It becomes pretty real and it comes home to you," he said of those charges, although he hasn't accepted a security detail.

"Unless we see a return to civility and we see less emphasis on social media, you're going to have a difficult time attracting good quality candidates at all three orders of government," he told CBC.

This group of departing councillors said beyond the threats, even the day-to-day interactions with the public wore them down.

Across the board they say they were yelled at by constituents who felt COVID restrictions were too much and those who believed they weren't enough, from people who wanted to jump the queue for their vaccine shot to those who accused officials of killing them.

They are told they are stupid or corrupt — or worse — for voting a certain way, sometimes on social media, sometimes by email.

"I worry for some of the people, quite frankly, that put their names forward, if they really know what they're stepping into right now," said Egli. "Four years is a long time."

These last four years may have seemed longer than most.

While councillors felt the effects of civil discourse disintegrating in the broader world, council itself seemed more fractious than ever.

That dysfunction was on its fullest display during a special council meeting on Feb. 16, more than two weeks after hundreds of trucks took over large swaths of the downtown core protesting COVID-19 mandates, with police seemingly unable to bring the occupation to an end.

The chief of police had resigned abruptly the previous day. And now, Diane Deans was being ousted as chair of the police board after her colleagues discovered she had hired an interim police chief from outside the city.

During the term's most vitriolic meeting, councillors cried, charged that the mayor's move to have Deans out as chair was"political" and called for Watson to step down.

Others called hiring a new chief frantic, ridiculous and stupid. All this with 70,000 people tuned into city council's YouTube channel.

For Deans, it was one of the lowest moments in her 28 years in office. She said the move by the mayor and his supporters was a public takedown and it's what led her to change her mind about running for mayor this October.

"It did impact me, I couldn't say it didn't," said Deans, who chokes up a little at the memory of that meeting.

"I have not gotten over that. I just don't think that that was reasonable what they did. You know I had [a] cancer diagnosis this term and I want my life to be meaningful at this point … There's part of me that's just like, 'I don't need that.'"

She said her removal from the board was political and wrong and that if she was in the mayor's inner circle, it wouldn't have happened.

Not everyone sees it that way.

Those who voted to remove her said that Deans' hiring of an interim chief — while in her purview as chair — was itself a political move and was further destabilizing the city's plight.

Watson himself maintains that stepping in helped end the convoy protest.

"When you're firing someone, which is in essence what we did with Diane Deans, it's not a pleasant experience, but at the end of the day it was the right decision," he told CBC.

Council members have conceded that meeting was not their finest moment. It exposed many of the fault lines on council.

How did it get that bad?

Scott Moffatt has seen many a heated debate over his 12 years representing a sprawling rural ward.

There are always going to be divisive issues and decisions on council, he said, but "it's the moments between divisive votes that matter."

And this term, because of COVID-19, there were no moments in between.

Like thousands of Ottawa public servants, city councillors spent hours glued to their screens for marathon meetings, whether it was for a coronavirus update or listening to a hundred delegations on the official plan.

Moffatt is a father of five — he and his wife had a child each of the last three terms he's served — and although he's in his early 40s, he's one of the veteran councillors who's not running again.

When council business moved from in-person committee rooms to Zoom, he set up a virtual office in a camper parked in his laneway. He'd be staring into his laptop for eight, nine, even 10 hours before being able to turn it off.

"My kids are asleep, I'm alone," he said. "We're in silence."

If councillors had finished a heated debate on virtual council, whatever bad feelings arose were left to fester.

"On Zoom, our screens turn off and we're separate," he told CBC.

"If that happened at council, we're sitting side-by-side. There's a strong chance after the committee meeting or council meeting, we continue that conversation. And it doesn't end up getting worse, it actually gets better because there's a bit of different respect when you're sitting beside someone, when you're face-to-face with someone."

When a virtual council meeting was over, councillors didn't return to their offices on Councillors' Row, where they might share a coffee, exchange views or even just have a casual chat.

"There's no other conversation that happens," said Moffatt.

The outgoing members of council say this term isn't normal.

"If you're a first-term councillor this term and this is your experience and your knowledge — I think of someone like Catherine Kitts that came into this job during the pandemic — I feel for them because they don't know what this job is really like," said Moffatt.

Deans used almost the exact same words in describing the past term, but she doesn't chalk it up solely to the effects of the pandemic.

She said Watson set a tone of divisiveness before March 2020, picking favourites and sidelining those he didn't agree with to an unusual degree.

Had she and her colleagues been on better terms, had the mayor not played petty politics, she argued, council might have better weathered the many storms that landed in the last four years.

The mayor, she said, "did things very differently at the start of this term." The problem was the establishment of what critics have dubbed "The Watson Club," she added.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottaw...ever-1.6570993
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #377  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2022, 5:15 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 27,631
McKenney's transit promises. Goods tart, but I wish they would commit to lowering transit fares for all, even if it's by 50 cents per ride and $15 for a monthly pass. I'd like a group discount too for families (any day, not just holidays and weekends as it is now), couples or a group of friends.

The assumption is that regular adult fares are for people with money who can afford the high prices of riding transit. The thing is though, we can also afford to drive. Transit must be cost competitive for all.

Quote:
Colton Praill
@ColtonPraill
Mayoral candidate
@cmckenney
outlining their transit platform.

• Freeze transit fares
• Free transit for 17 and under riders
• Lower Echo pass (low-income pass)
• Increase transit operations by 20%
Could mean more routes or longer operations.

#Ottawa #OttNews
11:14 AM · Sep 6, 2022
·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/ColtonPraill/sta...NTKCkpLkg&s=19
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #378  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2022, 2:03 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is online now
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,198
And they're off — mayoral contenders spar over fare-free transit
Sutcliffe accuses McKenney of 'flip-flopping,' who responds they never promised an immediate end of fares

Natalia Goodwin · CBC News
Posted: Sep 06, 2022 4:00 AM ET | Last Updated: September 6


The municipal election is still seven weeks away, and already some of the key mayoral candidates are mixing it up on the campaign trail — an indication this could be the most combative race in more than a decade.

Campaigns don't usually ramp up significantly until after Labour Day, but last week, Mark Sutcliffe accused Catherine McKenney of misleading voters and "flip-flopping" about their position on fare-free transit.

But the outgoing Somerset councillor says they've done no such thing, arguing they've never planned to eliminate transit fares overnight and has told local media that Sutcliffe is "fear-mongering."

The sparring stemmed from a debate on the environment organized by the Community Associations for Environmental Sustainability (CAFE) in Kanata last week (there's another in Orléans on Wednesday).

In that debate, candidate Ade Olumide said considering McKenney was in favour of "free transit for all," he wanted to know by how much McKenney (who uses the pronouns they/them) would raise taxes.

McKenney came back and said "that has never come out of my mouth."

Later in that same debate, Sutcliffe — a longtime broadcaster and businessman — brought the topic up again, pointing to articles McKenney has written on the topic in which they support fare-free transit.

"We do have to move towards free transit, every city around the world will do so," McKenney responded. "But I am not suggesting that the taxpayer in this city will have to support free transit and it will not be part of my platform."

But then Sutcliffe's campaign doubled down with two news releases to the media in the days following last Tuesday's debate.

That included a link to an article McKenney wrote for a downtown community newspaper where they make the case for fare-free transit, including the point that a city would need less money for roads if more people took transit.

McKenney also states in the article that "one way of encouraging transit use is to reduce significantly and eventually remove user fees."

When asked about the style of those news releases and if it's indicative of the what the tone of this campaign will be, Sutcliffe said that he is willing to work with everyone, but he thinks it's fair to challenge opponents.

"People have been attacking me since the day I registered to be a candidate. So we're going to be challenged during this campaign. People are going to ask us where we stand on the issues," he said.

"All I'm doing is trying to make it clear to people that Catherine has spoken out in favour of fare-free transit in the past and so we need to know where they stand on that issue."

When asked about the news releases accusing them of "flip-flopping," McKenney said "they will continue to run just a positive campaign based on, you know, my ideas for making Ottawa a better city.

"If people feel that they want to challenge me, I'm happy to respond."

McKenney reiterated that they have never promised a sweeping move to fare-free transit for everyone at once.

"I've always been very clear that I support us moving toward free transit," they said, arguing it is a public service like city libraries.

"There was a time when there was a cost to enter a library, we would never consider that today," they said.

But they added they've "always said it will not be done overnight, it can't be done immediately and it certainly cannot be done on the property tax base alone."

McKenney said they will be revealing their plan for transit very soon and that it will outline a clear path to make Ottawa's transit system affordable and efficient, but wouldn't share many details of that plan.

They've scheduled an announcement Tuesday morning.

"We have to work with, you know, federal, provincial governments as partners in advancing their goals for climate action and, you know, safe transportation and changes around how we move about the city. I believe that over time we can get there."

McKenney said they do not want to raise fees any more, as it only deters ridership, and they want to look at the cost of fare generation and how cutting those costs could help to bring the city to fare-free transit eventually.

Other candidates knock the idea of free fares.

Sutcliffe pulled no punches with his thoughts on a fare-free transit system.

"There is no such thing as free transit," he said. "Obviously, we have to pay for the public transit system one way or another. And if the people who are using public transit aren't paying for it, then taxpayers have to."

Sutcliffe said he wants to concentrate more on improving the system so it works better for everyone by extending the rail lines further into the suburbs and improving bus service there.

He is also committed to making rides more affordable.

"I do think we need to look at where the fares are, make sure they're aligned with what people can afford to pay," he said.

"I'm not in favour of jacking up transit fees and having annual increases that puts transit beyond people's reach, because we do want people using the system."

Bob Chiarelli was not available for an interview Sunday but sent a statement.

"I am opposed to the notion of free transit," he said adding that he feels it will add to residential taxes. He also pointed to the discounted programs such as the Community Pass and discounts for seniors, children and post-secondary students.

"I am prepared to adjust these discounts further, but a wholesale dump on the taxpayer is unaffordable," the statement said.

Chiarelli went on to say that with the possibility of many public servants continuing to work from home means "some serious decisions need to be made about what the future transit network looks like in this city."

He has pledged a 100-day review of OC Transpo's operations in order to find efficiencies.

Other candidates that CBC spoke to share the feeling that fare-free transit isn't realistic right now, but support making OC Transpo more affordable.

Graham MacDonald wants to work with the province in order to decrease fares across the board, but said he is not in favour of putting the cost on taxpayers.

Param Singh had a similar idea, that the service needs to be revisited and made more affordable, though he said it could be a possibility to have free fares sometime in the future. He believes in making the system more affordable, again by working with other levels of government.

Nour Kadri had an idea of starting a pilot project of some free routes in underserved communities and populations, such as seniors, in order to try to transition to funding transit through other forms of revenue, like having digital ads on transit.

In an email, Mike McGuire said he would not be increasing fares for at least a year and would bring back some key routes that have been cancelled, paying for it from "the expected 2023 budgetary surplus." He is against tax increases to support transit operations.

With files from Joanne Chianello

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottaw...ares-1.6572717
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #379  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2022, 2:03 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is online now
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,198
Catherine McKenney promises fare freeze, more rides, free transit for kids
$35M for major planks wouldn't come from cuts, property tax hike

CBC News
Posted: Sep 06, 2022 1:46 PM ET | Last Updated: 1 hour ago


Ottawa mayoral candidate Catherine McKenney's proposals to improve the city's transit network and attract riders include a fare freeze, free rides for children, expanded service, and investment in electrification and Para Transpo.

"If people can't get to where they need to be on time, if they can't afford to ride transit every day, then their city is failing them. For far too many people, our city is failing them," they said in a news conference outside Blair station Tuesday.

Their plan to fix this includes increasing the number of routes and buses running by 20 per cent during their first four years, with a focus on buses within communities and not just to commute to and from the core.

Everyone under age 18 could ride for free, expanding the current approach that lets children under eight ride for free and age-based discounts for youth up to age 19. Their argument is it would save families money and lead kids to using transit more as adults.

They would lower the $58.25 monthly Equipass to match the Community Pass rate — currently 43.25 — and they'd spend more on Para Transpo and accessible taxi services by raising the surcharge on ride-hailing to 20 cents per ride from 10.

They'd electrify the city's bus fleet more quickly and, if RTG is found in default of its light rail maintenance contract, bring that work under city control.

It would cost $35 million in their first budget for some of the major planks, McKenney said: $18 million for more trips, $14 million to make transit free for children, $2 million for freezing fares and $1 million on the Equipass.

McKenney committed to funding the changes without cutting services or increasing property taxes more than the three-per-cent cap set by current Mayor Jim Watson, who is not running again.

McKenney's transit policies came under attack from fellow mayoral candidate Mark Sutcliffe last week, specifically whether their support for the idea of fare-free transit would mean they would raise taxes to make it happen.

McKenney said it can't be done immediately or on property taxes alone.

Sutcliffe said he wants more buses and trains in Ottawa's suburbs while making rides more affordable.

Bob Chiarelli's mayoral campaign said in a statement he's prepared to adjust existing fare discounts and that a broader review of OC Transpo is needed.

Fourteen people are running for mayor. Ottawa's election day is Oct. 24, with early in-person voting starting Sept. 24.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottaw...mise-1.6573485
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #380  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2022, 2:15 AM
YOWetal YOWetal is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,422
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
McKenney's transit promises. Goods tart, but I wish they would commit to lowering transit fares for all, even if it's by 50 cents per ride and $15 for a monthly pass. I'd like a group discount too for families (any day, not just holidays and weekends as it is now), couples or a group of friends.

The assumption is that regular adult fares are for people with money who can afford the high prices of riding transit. The thing is though, we can also afford to drive. Transit must be cost competitive for all.


https://twitter.com/ColtonPraill/sta...NTKCkpLkg&s=19
Partially agree with you and yes transit is the classic case of assuming the demand is completely inelastic.

I know for me as a cheap centre dweller with a car I barely use the cost of transit is a huge disincentive. Mostly I substitute walking or biking which naturally are green but cost system revenue on a quiet Saturday when I might take the train to Westboro. Driving somewhere with free parking is generally cheaper too.

I like her proposals. I think you could argue the under 18 thing will cost a lot less than the headline number as for a family they are usually better off with a Uber or driving and charging the adult the cash fare and kids free will add some revenue. Also eliminating child fares gets rid of the scammers using kids Presto cards.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Business, Politics & the Economy
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:53 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.