Here's what happened:
1. City awarded contract to lowest common denominator.
2. LCD, to meet project schedule at first site meeting set up signage.
3. LCD f*cked off for three months, ignoring emails from City project manager.
4. Contractor, in a fit of hyperactivity one day (read: there was some extra asphalt from another job) went over and paved everything, to get the city off his back.
5. Under threat of not getting paid, LCD sent some juvies over to the path to cut out the asphalt and put in the TWSI plates.
I'm sure it's super 'great' work that 'definitely' won't buckle or pothole.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradnixon
Makes sense in theory but in practice I'm not sure they are "maximizing utilization and efficiency"...
Take the case of one particular pathway that connects my neighbourhood to an adjacent one where my kids' school is located.
Signage went up to close the pathway in late July. It was dug up in the 2nd week of August. It was finally paved the Friday before Labour Day.
Then the day after Labour Day (the first day of school), they came back, saw cut and dug up the brand new asphalt at either end and installed new curbs and concrete with the TSWIs.
How does that construction sequencing make any sense? They could have done the concrete work first, and then paved without having to dig up brand new asphalt. 
|