HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1921  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2018, 7:02 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,276
Now, which one of you will run for the election to fix the Perimeter (including traffic lights on Highway 1 outside of Winnipeg and Highway 75)? I see 4 potential candidates here.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1922  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2018, 7:16 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 14,316
I think a pedestrian overpass on the old Waverley alignment would be nice. Connect the two areas better. I'll run for office if you donate 7 figures to me, to the left of the decimal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1923  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2018, 7:50 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,276
Ugh if I had that much money, I'd rather donate it to the ministry of transportation to get one interchange done.

Seriously, though, can't politics be any cheaper...
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1924  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2018, 9:23 PM
CoryB CoryB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 5,955
If Wilkes doesn't get touched in the south Perimeter review I would be shocked. The fixes are fairly simple:

- push the SB exit lane further south so it doesn't exit in the blindspot of the bridge. Give it a longer deceleration runway.

- to accommodate that the SB acceleration lane is going to also need to be extended.

- change the NB merge lane from the dead drop at the top of the bridge to a longer ramp up merging shortly before the bridge.

- to accommodate the NB merge lane extension the NB exit will also need to be extended.

As it is undeveloped land in the area the expropriation costs would be minimal.

A similar improvement would be to give the Roblin merge lane entry NB traffic flow a longer runway. Currently the merge point is somewhat in a blindspot from the interchange.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1925  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2018, 1:01 AM
WildCake WildCake is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 897
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoryB View Post
If Wilkes doesn't get touched in the south Perimeter review I would be shocked. The fixes are fairly simple:

- push the SB exit lane further south so it doesn't exit in the blindspot of the bridge. Give it a longer deceleration runway.

- to accommodate that the SB acceleration lane is going to also need to be extended.

- change the NB merge lane from the dead drop at the top of the bridge to a longer ramp up merging shortly before the bridge.

- to accommodate the NB merge lane extension the NB exit will also need to be extended.

As it is undeveloped land in the area the expropriation costs would be minimal.

A similar improvement would be to give the Roblin merge lane entry NB traffic flow a longer runway. Currently the merge point is somewhat in a blindspot from the interchange.
Definitely forgot about Wilkes on my list from the previous page
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1926  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2018, 2:03 AM
dennis dennis is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 1,300
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheswick View Post
Well maybe it has to do with the fact Manitoba has 30% more people than Nova Scotia but 1100% more land area in which to connect via highways.
If only we had the same total length of freeways as Nova Scotia. And if they were only in the populated regions of southern Manitoba.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1927  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2018, 3:31 AM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,276
Digression: RCMP Hotspot

https://mobile.twitter.com/rcmpmb

Just take a look at all the pictures with the hashtag #RCMPHOTSPOT .

Seriously, your cops are so strict. If I go 120 kph on the Perimeter where the speed limit is 100 kph, I’ll get a big, fat ticket too.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1928  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2018, 1:28 PM
Riverman's Avatar
Riverman Riverman is offline
Fossil fuel & rubber
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario's feel good town
Posts: 4,031
Funny, 120 in a 100 is fine here. At 120 you are basically in the traffic flow. Every place is different.
__________________
Get off my lawn.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1929  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2018, 3:03 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 14,316
Wilkes will get the same treatment as Roblin did. The new bridge allows for 6 lanes of traffic below.

I guess Wilkes goes over so it's a bit different.

Last edited by bomberjet; Nov 1, 2018 at 3:36 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1930  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2018, 3:04 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 14,316
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverman View Post
Funny, 120 in a 100 is fine here. At 120 you are basically in the traffic flow. Every place is different.
Sometime in the last couple years a group of people did the speed limit on the 401 across all lanes. It backed up traffic forever and caused big delays. It was to prove a point that going 100 is not adequate to maintain good traffic flow, due to vehicle volume.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1931  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2018, 3:12 PM
Riverman's Avatar
Riverman Riverman is offline
Fossil fuel & rubber
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario's feel good town
Posts: 4,031
I bet. Not an issue out here, but in the city it is bad enough.
__________________
Get off my lawn.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1932  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2018, 3:33 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
Sometime in the last couple years a group of people did the speed limit on the 401 across all lanes. It backed up traffic forever and caused big delays. It was to prove a point that going 100 is not adequate to maintain good traffic flow, due to vehicle volume.
I find in the US it's pretty lax on urban interstates that are similar to the 401 in terms of size and volume. The only place I've driven over 200 kph is on interstates around Los Angeles (wide open 10 lane roads with no traffic, so very low risk) ... I'd probably be in jail if I attempted that on the Perimeter.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1933  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2018, 3:39 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,276
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
I find in the US it's pretty lax on urban interstates that are similar to the 401 in terms of size and volume. The only place I've driven over 200 kph is on interstates around Los Angeles (wide open 10 lane roads with no traffic, so very low risk) ... I'd probably be in jail if I attempted that on the Perimeter.
There was this one time that RCMP caught a person test-driving a car from a dealership at 224 kph on Highway 100 near an intersection with traffic lights (so 2.8 times the speed limit). The cops called the dealership to come pick up the car. I don’t know what became of the driver afterwards though.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1934  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2018, 3:39 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 14,316
Also, talking about the McGillivray truck access thing. I forgot about the 4 mile road interchange. There's your solution to the trucking problem. No interchange at the rail line. make it an overpass whenever it's warranted and/or makes sense.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1935  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2018, 4:46 PM
CoryB CoryB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 5,955
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
Wilkes will get the same treatment as Roblin did. The new bridge allows for 6 lanes of traffic below.

I guess Wilkes goes over so it's a bit different.
Wilkes will be an absolutely massive project if they want to make it six lanes. The "easiest" of the fixes would likely be building a second bridge to the west to handle the SB flow long term then undertake a major rehab of the existing bridge for three lane NB long term with perhaps a dedicated merge lane over the bridge that enters the traffic flow on the north side of the existing structure.

The other alternative would be taking the existing structure completely offline, removing the bridge decking, as was done at Roblin, widening the approached for added lanes and then building a new bridge. Removing the bridge would require a temporary at-grade rail crossing on the relatively busy CN mainline.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1936  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2018, 5:02 PM
vjose32 vjose32 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 671
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoryB View Post
If Wilkes doesn't get touched in the south Perimeter review I would be shocked. The fixes are fairly simple:

- push the SB exit lane further south so it doesn't exit in the blindspot of the bridge. Give it a longer deceleration runway.

- to accommodate that the SB acceleration lane is going to also need to be extended.

- change the NB merge lane from the dead drop at the top of the bridge to a longer ramp up merging shortly before the bridge.

- to accommodate the NB merge lane extension the NB exit will also need to be extended.

As it is undeveloped land in the area the expropriation costs would be minimal.

A similar improvement would be to give the Roblin merge lane entry NB traffic flow a longer runway. Currently the merge point is somewhat in a blindspot from the interchange.
Seems really unnecessary to do anything with Wilkes, the amount of traffic on there is quite minimal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1937  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2018, 5:05 PM
vjose32 vjose32 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 671
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
There was this one time that RCMP caught a person test-driving a car from a dealership at 224 kph on Highway 100 near an intersection with traffic lights (so 2.8 times the speed limit). The cops called the dealership to come pick up the car. I don’t know what became of the driver afterwards though.
Well if that was you, you are an idiot, and shouldn’t be allowed to drive ever!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1938  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2018, 5:07 PM
vjose32 vjose32 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 671
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
https://mobile.twitter.com/rcmpmb

Just take a look at all the pictures with the hashtag #RCMPHOTSPOT .

Seriously, your cops are so strict. If I go 120 kph on the Perimeter where the speed limit is 100 kph, I’ll get a big, fat ticket too.
No reason to go that fast
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1939  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2018, 5:16 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 14,316
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoryB View Post
Wilkes will be an absolutely massive project if they want to make it six lanes. The "easiest" of the fixes would likely be building a second bridge to the west to handle the SB flow long term then undertake a major rehab of the existing bridge for three lane NB long term with perhaps a dedicated merge lane over the bridge that enters the traffic flow on the north side of the existing structure.

The other alternative would be taking the existing structure completely offline, removing the bridge decking, as was done at Roblin, widening the approached for added lanes and then building a new bridge. Removing the bridge would require a temporary at-grade rail crossing on the relatively busy CN mainline.
I was thinking a new bridge completely too, which may happen. Or just close down one side, widen it to 3 lanes and rehab. Same thing for the other side. Then push out the ramps and stuff to make it better geometry. Didn't they rebuild the piers there too with new girders. Basically new bridges.

Edit: Looking at Streetview and Roblin looks to be all brand new. And is very wide underneath.

Quote:
Originally Posted by vjose32 View Post
Seems really unnecessary to do anything with Wilkes, the amount of traffic on there is quite minimal.
The structure at Wilkes is for Perimeter Hwy traffic. So it's just as busy as any other spot on the south Perimeter. It needs to be rehabbed at minimum.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1940  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2018, 5:26 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 9,019
The Wilkes Ave - Perimeter grade separation will be reconstructed as part of the South Perimeter project. The bridge needs to be widened to 6 lanes and the geometry of the ramps will be reconfigured.
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:31 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.