HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & Urban Ottawa


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5441  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2018, 5:35 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,594
I created a new thread for this Sound Stage proposal over here:

http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?goto=newpost&t=235569
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5442  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2018, 2:13 AM
YOWflier's Avatar
YOWflier YOWflier is offline
Melissa: fabulous.
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: YOW/CYOW/CUUP
Posts: 3,190
There was some talk recently about whether Lamb has fled Ottawa for good. Here's the answer:

http://obj.ca/index.php/article/ottawa-condo-market-poised-change-dramatically

Quote:
Ottawa condo market poised to ‘change dramatically’

...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5443  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2018, 12:56 PM
roger1818's Avatar
roger1818 roger1818 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Stittsville, ON
Posts: 6,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by ac888yow View Post
There was some talk recently about whether Lamb has fled Ottawa for good. Here's the answer:

http://obj.ca/index.php/article/ottawa-condo-market-poised-change-dramatically
Interesting article, thanks for sharing. One quote that caught my attention was when he was taking about his idea for a 4 star hotel and said it would have, “a swimming pool on the roof with girls hanging around in bikinis.” The only way to ensure girls in bikinis are there is to hire them or maybe let call girls audition to work there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5444  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2018, 2:29 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,594
Conflicting city information leaves developer, community association at loggerheads

Taylor Blewett, Ottawa Citizen
Updated: September 1, 2018


A local builder and a neighbourhood community association both agree that a historic, wooded property at 21 Withrow Ave. in Nepean would make a great park — but the question of whether it’s possible is where they don’t see eye-to-eye.

At a rally Friday, Theberge Homes president Joey Theberge and City View Community Association president Joan Clark discussed, very cordially, the future of the property in which they’re both deeply invested. The conversation revealed they actually shared a lot of common ground, but they were operating under different assumptions about the park’s future based on conversations with local politicians.

Since the 2015 death of former resident Dr. John Roger, a 60-year fixture at the Civic Hospital, the City View Community Association has been working to see 21 Withrow turned into a park. The nearly two-century-old-house was once the home of poet William Wilfred Campbell and hosts more than 120 mature trees on its two acres.

“We would like the city to buy it, and we’re building a business plan,” Clark explained Friday at a rally hosted by the community association in front of the property.

“I’ve heard that there is a chance … if we come up with some money, and then the city would match it,” she said.

The association envisions a partnership with Poets Pathway to turn the heritage home on the site into a Canadian Poetry Centre and create a public park with its green space.

“It’s just a piece of magic,” she said of the property.

The rally was organized to protest the redevelopment plan that poses a significant threat to this dream. In December, Theberge Homes filed a development application for the property. The company plans to build a 13-home subdivision and preserve the heritage home, renovating its interior. Nine of the homes would sit on a new private street, and be built with stone and designed to match the area’s character, Theberge said Friday. He’d have to raze many of the property’s trees for the development, which has raised the ire of some.

“These mature neighbourhoods are always very sensitive areas because it’s a beautiful community,” he noted, explaining that he’s made every effort to work with neighbours to create a development that everybody can be as comfortable as possible with.

Indeed, Clark said as much in an interview at the rally. “We’ve had respect for each other, where he is developer and he’s on one side of the spectrum, and we’re on the other.

“We understand each other, (but) it’s hard to come to an agreement when this is going to be lost right away,” she said, gesturing to the green space behind her.

Asked earlier for his thoughts on the community association’s vision for the area, Theberge said he supports the park and poetry centre concept, “but who’s paying for it?”

“The city has told me there is no avenue … to buy this land as a park.”

Mixed messages were swapped after Theberge showed up in shorts and a T-shirt, with his dog in tow, to visit the rally-goers Friday night. When Clark and Theberge, who are on a first-name basis, having shared conversations about the property, were asked about their fundamentally different plans for it, they were faced with one another’s different understandings of its potential to become a park.

Theberge has a firm agreement to buy the property from the Roger family, but said he would sell it to the community association and the city for use as a public space “in a heartbeat” if that was an option on the table. But from what he’s been told, it isn’t.

“From my talk with the councillor and the mayor, there’s no avenue to expropriate,” he said. “From what I’ve heard, from predominantly even the mayor’s office…they said there is no avenue and no money whatsoever.”

Clark, meanwhile, said ward Coun. Rick Chiarelli has supported the community association’s efforts. And it didn’t stop there, she said. “We went to the mayor’s office and they said, ‘If you came up with some money … .”

They’ve been working with a ballpark figure of $500,000 on their end, she said, and believed the city would be able to come up with the same.

“People are saying different stories,” Theberge started, “to different people,” Clark finished.

“Purchase is possible; I don’t know about expropriation,” Chiarelli said Friday. He’s been working to help the community association raise money to acquire the property, and said he’s never told Theberge, who he has met with, that doing so wouldn’t be possible. He noted, however, that Theberge had a meeting with Mayor Jim Watson that Chiarelli didn’t attend.

“I’ve always said … it’s an uphill battle, but never that it couldn’t happen.”

The mayor could not be reached for comment Friday.

The most frustrating aspect of this, Theberge pointed out, is that the community association has been fundraising for three years for a park, and he’s spent a year-and-a-half working to get this development off the ground — a lot of time spent by two groups who, apparently, are open to the same solution.

“If they want to buy it, they can raise money and just buy it off myself,” he said. “If the city wants to expropriate the land for a park, I will roll out the red carpet for them.”

https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-new...per-community-association-at-loggerheads
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5445  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2018, 3:19 PM
BlackSpade741 BlackSpade741 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Montreal
Posts: 6
A more general question: Do any towers in Ottawa have the smart elevators?

i.e. the ones where you enter your destination floor outside and they direct you to an elevator?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5446  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2018, 3:26 PM
McC's Avatar
McC McC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,057
The Flaherty Building does. They generally seem to work well, but one annoyance I have witnessed a number of times: the main interface terminal is located at one end of the elevator bank, and it can direct you to the furthest elevator, and then will close the doors in your face.
How rude!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5447  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2018, 6:46 PM
danishh danishh is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 429
a lot of the newer government-occupied buildings do. In Hull I think 105 Hotel de Ville, 30 Rue Victoria, and 22 Eddy all have them. I think PWGSC might be including them as a requirement in their build-to-suit tendering.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5448  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2018, 6:55 PM
ars ars is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 473
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackSpade741 View Post
A more general question: Do any towers in Ottawa have the smart elevators?

i.e. the ones where you enter your destination floor outside and they direct you to an elevator?
The Shopify/KPMG building on Elgin has that. Apparently everyone at Shopify hates them because of some annoying quirks those elevators have(I like them though).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5449  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2018, 7:49 PM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,055
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackSpade741 View Post
A more general question: Do any towers in Ottawa have the smart elevators?

i.e. the ones where you enter your destination floor outside and they direct you to an elevator?
World Exchange has them, which I noticed when arriving for a meeting a few weeks ago. I don't think they were "smart" the last time I went upstairs in that building.
__________________
___
Enjoy my taxes, Orleans (and Kanata?).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5450  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2018, 8:58 PM
Marshsparrow Marshsparrow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,680
The one quirk is that if you press your floor number, wait a few seconds and then do it again and again and again the elevator thinks that this represents # of people going in the elevator - I swear - no evidence but the elevator stops less when I am given the opportunity to do this!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5451  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 8:58 PM
jcphoenix jcphoenix is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 139
My work building, 340 Laurier Ave W, had them installed a few years ago.

They're okay although I've experienced long waits on occasion. Also only last week I input the ground floor as my destination; an elevator came but it went up past my floor to five different floors (carrying other passengers) before it went all the way back down just for me. Seemed rather odd and inefficient (shouldn't it have just gotten me on the way down?) but I can't really tell of course without knowing where all the other elevators were going (there are 4).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5452  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2018, 1:24 AM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,854
So turns out the Feds didn't paint the top of Place du Portage I black. That's a fiberglass net to catch concrete crumbling from the building. They have 60 of those all over the complex. So now, we're playing musical death traps between Portage, Chaudière and Esplanade Laurier.


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/portage-iii-renovations-displaced-workers-1.4812130
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5453  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2018, 1:46 AM
Vixx Vixx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Wild Rose Country/Worst Case Ontario
Posts: 398
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
So turns out the Feds didn't paint the top of Place du Portage I black. That's a fiberglass net to catch concrete crumbling from the building. They have 60 of those all over the complex. So now, we're playing musical death traps between Portage, Chaudière and Esplanade Laurier.


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/portage-iii-renovations-displaced-workers-1.4812130
The poorly designed 70's-80's era government complexes are finally coming back to bite them. It's not even just in the NCR where government buildings are in poor shape, I've heard through the grapevine that there are issues with other buildings in other cities as well.

Wonder how much would have to be spent on upgrading and modernizing all these buildings.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5454  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2018, 11:58 AM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,854
Getting pretty bad. Sure Harper hired a bunch of people then layed half of them off, but at least he commissioned new government buildings in order to transfer employees and renovate the older stock.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5455  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2018, 12:05 PM
acottawa acottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 18,846
I wish they would tear more down instead of undertaking these costly renovation schemes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5456  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2018, 2:15 PM
1overcosc's Avatar
1overcosc 1overcosc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 12,377
Quote:
Originally Posted by acottawa View Post
I wish they would tear more down instead of undertaking these costly renovation schemes.
Agreed. Tear down and replace is probably a lot more cost effective in the long run.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5457  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2018, 2:44 PM
TransitZilla TransitZilla is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,799
Does anyone know what is going on with 740 Springland (the Norberry Residences redevelopment in Mooney's Bay)?

The DevApps site says the status is "Application Refused by OMB" but I can't locate any OMB or LPAT decision on it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5458  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2018, 3:15 PM
Spoonsy's Avatar
Spoonsy Spoonsy is offline
You call that a knife?
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Centretown West
Posts: 326
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradnixon View Post
Does anyone know what is going on with 740 Springland (the Norberry Residences redevelopment in Mooney's Bay)?

The DevApps site says the status is "Application Refused by OMB" but I can't locate any OMB or LPAT decision on it.
The application was approved and bylaw amendment passed by council, someone appealed to OMB, OMB refused the appeal, so it seems to be clear, legally, to proceed....

The status descriptor makes it sound like the project was canned but I think it was just the appeal refused

Here is the LPAT decision:
https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onlpat/doc/2018/2018canlii82034/2018canlii82034.html

Full application history
Date Status
2018-08-27 Application Refused by OMB
2018-06-19 OMB Package Sent
2018-06-05 Appealed to OMB
2018-05-16 By-law Passed - In Appeal Period
2018-05-09 Application Approved by Council
2018-03-02 Application Reactivated
2017-10-25 Comment Period in Progress
2017-10-20 Community "Heads Up" - Completed
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5459  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2018, 3:59 PM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,055
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1overcosc View Post
Agreed. Tear down and replace is probably a lot more cost effective in the long run.
Those monstrosities are another good target for raffling off the rights to start the controlled demolition.
__________________
___
Enjoy my taxes, Orleans (and Kanata?).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5460  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2018, 6:29 PM
TransitZilla TransitZilla is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,799
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spoonsy View Post
The application was approved and bylaw amendment passed by council, someone appealed to OMB, OMB refused the appeal, so it seems to be clear, legally, to proceed....

The status descriptor makes it sound like the project was canned but I think it was just the appeal refused

Here is the LPAT decision:
https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onlpat/doc/2018/2018canlii82034/2018canlii82034.html

Full application history
Date Status
2018-08-27 Application Refused by OMB
2018-06-19 OMB Package Sent
2018-06-05 Appealed to OMB
2018-05-16 By-law Passed - In Appeal Period
2018-05-09 Application Approved by Council
2018-03-02 Application Reactivated
2017-10-25 Comment Period in Progress
2017-10-20 Community "Heads Up" - Completed
That makes sense- thanks.

I have no idea how you found that document; I had tried searching that site for Springland but that text appears nowhere in the decision document.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & Urban Ottawa
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:29 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.