HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #801  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2017, 1:31 AM
blueandgoldguy blueandgoldguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,847
So they basically want to charge the same rates for a 275 square foot apartment in Winnipeg as they would in Vancouver. Yeah, I'm sure the rooms will rent out in no time flat.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #802  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2017, 3:23 AM
WolselyMan WolselyMan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 118
Quote:
Originally Posted by blueandgoldguy View Post
So they basically want to charge the same rates for a 275 square foot apartment in Winnipeg as they would in Vancouver. Yeah, I'm sure the rooms will rent out in no time flat.
Thank god the free market is gonna eat these people alive.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #803  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2017, 8:23 PM
goldenboi's Avatar
goldenboi goldenboi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 133
Quote:
Originally Posted by biguc View Post
They also need to de-freewayize the street itself. Restoring it to its older, slightly bendier configuration would help (and make the sidewalk next to Green Carrot actually wide enough) but even better would be narrowing Osborn to three lanes of traffic to make space for bike lanes.
I think that would significantly improve the village. Does anyone know if there have been efforts by the residents to "de-freewayize" Osborne? I wonder if a petition could gain any traction and put some pressure on the city. So many people live there, we just need to find Winnipeg's Jane Jacobs.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #804  
Old Posted May 2, 2017, 5:58 AM
buzzg buzzg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 7,834
I've always argued for 3 lanes on Osborne. Add separated bike lanes. One through lane each way and a centre turn lane no lefts during rush hour. Or, what I'd LOVE is for Winnipeg to get it's first euro-style direction-changing lane. Have signs above the centre lane that indicate direction of traffic and change it depending on time of day.

Realistically losing the 10 parking spots on Osborne that are only there after 7 pm anyway is not going to make any difference.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #805  
Old Posted May 2, 2017, 1:42 PM
TimeFadesAway TimeFadesAway is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 762
Quote:
Originally Posted by buzzg View Post
I've always argued for 3 lanes on Osborne. Add separated bike lanes. One through lane each way and a centre turn lane no lefts during rush hour. Or, what I'd LOVE is for Winnipeg to get it's first euro-style direction-changing lane. Have signs above the centre lane that indicate direction of traffic and change it depending on time of day.
Didn't St. James at Polo Park and the Norwood Bridge (pre late '90s reconstruction) have direction-changing lanes?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #806  
Old Posted May 2, 2017, 2:17 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimeFadesAway View Post
Didn't St. James at Polo Park and the Norwood Bridge (pre late '90s reconstruction) have direction-changing lanes?
Yes they did. I remember the overhead lights with Xs and arrows on St. James probably until around 1990 or so. The middle turning lane kind of lived on after that as a legacy. I don't really ever remember seeing the direction-changing lanes in use, though... maybe they stopped using them sometime before then?

The funny thing is that I don't remember traffic being all that bad on St. James after Bomber games, even with sellout crowds, so I wonder why they put those direction-changing lanes there in the first place.

I only have a faint memory of the ones on the Norwood.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #807  
Old Posted May 2, 2017, 2:45 PM
biguc's Avatar
biguc biguc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: pinkoland
Posts: 11,819
Quote:
Originally Posted by buzzg View Post
I've always argued for 3 lanes on Osborne. Add separated bike lanes. One through lane each way and a centre turn lane no lefts during rush hour. Or, what I'd LOVE is for Winnipeg to get it's first euro-style direction-changing lane. Have signs above the centre lane that indicate direction of traffic and change it depending on time of day.

Realistically losing the 10 parking spots on Osborne that are only there after 7 pm anyway is not going to make any difference.
This is exactly what I'm talking about. Do it from Dunkirk, all the way up Salter. Then do West Broadway, Ellice, Sargent, Logan, and Selkirk too.
__________________
no
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #808  
Old Posted May 2, 2017, 8:47 PM
Cyro's Avatar
Cyro Cyro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,197
Well underway...

260 Wellington Condominiums (crescentwood technically)

12 Units, 8 Stalls underground, Aluminum siding,composite,stucco..



Source

10. Plan Approval - 260 Wellington Crescent

Solid Infill for the lot size..
__________________
♥ ♥
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #809  
Old Posted May 2, 2017, 9:17 PM
EndoftheBeginning's Avatar
EndoftheBeginning EndoftheBeginning is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 414
See that one every day on my commute, framing is going up now. It's crammed into a pretty small lot beside that tudor style apartment that I don't think has a name.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #810  
Old Posted May 2, 2017, 9:23 PM
Cyro's Avatar
Cyro Cyro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by EndoftheBeginning View Post
See that one every day on my commute, framing is going up now. It's crammed into a pretty small lot beside that tudor style apartment that I don't think has a name.
The demand in the area is there, 12 units, 8 underground spaces, shoe horned into a very small foot print.. See it everday as well..
__________________
♥ ♥
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #811  
Old Posted May 2, 2017, 9:38 PM
biguc's Avatar
biguc biguc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: pinkoland
Posts: 11,819
People sure like that wood grain metal panelling these days. Buildings all look like stereos from the 70s. I dig it, but who knows how it'll age.
__________________
no
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #812  
Old Posted May 2, 2017, 10:12 PM
Kinguni's Avatar
Kinguni Kinguni is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 1,567
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
Yes they did. I remember the overhead lights with Xs and arrows on St. James probably until around 1990 or so. The middle turning lane kind of lived on after that as a legacy. I don't really ever remember seeing the direction-changing lanes in use, though... maybe they stopped using them sometime before then?

The funny thing is that I don't remember traffic being all that bad on St. James after Bomber games, even with sellout crowds, so I wonder why they put those direction-changing lanes there in the first place.

I only have a faint memory of the ones on the Norwood.
After Bomber games St James was set to 4 Southbound lanes to Portage. I can't recall what the street configuration was before they added the centre turning lane. It was experimental to begin with and worked better than what was used before that. Very common in other cities.

Norwood Bridge was fun with its changing lanes. Made rush hours smoother. Eliminated with the opening of the 1st span of the current Norwood Bridge.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #813  
Old Posted May 3, 2017, 12:26 AM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
^ Must have been quite a pricy experiment for the city. As I recall there were several sets of overhead lights spanning the whole street, plus all the neat folding right-turn-only signs at literally every parking lot entrance to St. James.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #814  
Old Posted May 3, 2017, 1:42 AM
oftheMoon's Avatar
oftheMoon oftheMoon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: East Exchanger
Posts: 675
Quote:
Originally Posted by buzzg View Post
Or, what I'd LOVE is for Winnipeg to get it's first euro-style direction-changing lane. Have signs above the centre lane that indicate direction of traffic and change it depending on time of day.
Like the old Norwood Bridge.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #815  
Old Posted May 3, 2017, 3:48 AM
BAKGUY BAKGUY is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,358
WOOD GRAIN METAL= Gross

Quote:
Originally Posted by biguc View Post
People sure like that wood grain metal panelling these days. Buildings all look like stereos from the 70s. I dig it, but who knows how it'll age.
Also Reminds me of gross wood grain look of early 70's stereos and worse...station wagon side panels. Vomitous at best!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #816  
Old Posted May 3, 2017, 4:00 AM
Pinus Pinus is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,409
Quote:
Originally Posted by oftheMoon View Post
Like the old Norwood Bridge.
I'm pretty sure the old St. James Street was also like this, when it used have varying lanes with arrows and x's, depending on the time of day or when there was a Jets/Bombers game on.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #817  
Old Posted May 3, 2017, 5:47 AM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is online now
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 14,700
Quote:
Originally Posted by biguc View Post
People sure like that wood grain metal panelling these days. Buildings all look like stereos from the 70s. I dig it, but who knows how it'll age.
That's funny.

Those designers sure like it. Part of their repertoire for sure. It's better than it used to be.

Nice infill.

Sure don't get why the strip is dying when there is so much new residential growth in the area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #818  
Old Posted May 3, 2017, 1:19 PM
TimeFadesAway TimeFadesAway is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 762
Quote:
Originally Posted by trueviking View Post
Sure don't get why the strip is dying when there is so much new residential growth in the area.
I've always heard that it's due to the limited number of not so easy to deal with landlords on the strip.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #819  
Old Posted May 3, 2017, 1:52 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimeFadesAway View Post
I've always heard that it's due to the limited number of not so easy to deal with landlords on the strip.
Don't landlords want tenants?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #820  
Old Posted May 3, 2017, 2:46 PM
optimusREIM's Avatar
optimusREIM optimusREIM is online now
There is always a way
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 3,156
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
Don't landlords want tenants?
I bet they expect unreasonable rents.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:22 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.