HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley


    Prime on the Plaza in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Surrey Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #81  
Old Posted Jun 30, 2015, 10:45 PM
Cypherus's Avatar
Cypherus Cypherus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,759
Quote:
Originally Posted by jhausner View Post
Yah I wouldn't take poor business sense as equating to bad investment. Anyone who buys a unit be it a 1 bedroom, 2 bedroom, micro-suite, or heck townhouse with the expectation to turn around and sell it immediately for a large gain or any gain is an idiot and has bad business sense. That doesn't mean buying these units can't be or isn't a good investment.

The quick flip though especially in Surrey Central where the market it saturated right now with a lot of projects on the horizon, is non-existent. The same thing happened around Edmonds a number of years ago and Metrotown more recently. If you bought at the start the unit prices went up slightly but then stayed relatively stable for many years before finally going up again once the building stopped.

I have a former colleague who purchased a unit in Edmonds for around $200,000 years ago. He ended up selling it for about $240,000 a few years later so earned a bit of money (was his primary residence so no capital gains) on it but the market was saturated as there were a bunch of other buildings going up. Today if he sold that unit, he would net $400,000+ given current market around there.

He sort of kicks himself but at the same time he had to sell because they were starting a family and they needed the money for a downpayment on a house out in Surrey. So for him it was ok but it just shows how many of these types of investments need to be long term if you want to make any good amount of money.

In Surrey Central right now, even for 2-bedroom condos, the increase in property values has been relatively flat. An example is my 1 bedroom. First year completed it shot up from the $150,000 I paid to $230,000. It has since hovered around that including last year's assessment.

Why? Because there are a lot of condos being built. Even if it dropped slightly it would have to drop below probably $180,000 for me to actually "lose" money on my return (doing quick math in my head so could be a bit off). It won't drop by $50,000 any time soon I don't think.

So I rent it out for enough that it pays for itself. Even though I am basically not making a profit on the unit, it pays for itself and a little bit extra to deal with unforeseen expenses which are virtually none given it is < 5 years old. But that was my long term plan. Live in a few years then move into something bigger and rent it out.

I may sell it one day but that will likely be in 10 years or so. By then you'll have virtually all the buildings around King George Station built up and more services and population base out in Surrey Central so I'd imagine the value will inch up from the $230,000 mark. Even if it stays the same over the next 10 years or raises to maybe $300,000 in that time, I still make a healthy profit on it and would deem it a good investment because the rent will go up over the next 10 years + my mortgage will go down meaning my equity will be even greater than it is today.

You're correct though that there are a lot more 1 bedrooms around and available so anyone expecting a huge profit is in for a surprise. Even if I sold today I'd make over $60,000 in profit if not a bit more after capital gains and fee and such.

I don't think anyone would laugh at a cheque for that amount of money.

At the end though it is still a gamble. Real-estate if invested in properly can be a relatively safe investment and lead to some good money in the longer term (look at the top billionaires in the world, many are in real-estate). But it is still a gamble and you do always run the risk of losing money on an investment. Some of it will always just be guess work and trying to predict the future.

I can educated guess how things will unfold in Surrey Central in the next 5 to 10 years, but I could be completely wrong at the end of the day who knows.
I think Central City area will boom in about 10-20 years. Surrey has about 1000 new residents a month so there is demand for affordable housing. With the professional jobs in the city core, including CRA, the hospital, medical buildings, City Hall, SFU, Coast Capital Headquarters, etc. there will be demand for housing around the city core so the value will be there for many. We should also expect to see more money flowing to the South of the Fraser since Metrotown is becoming unaffordable and starting to bear the characteristics of Vancouver in the early 2000s where prices were jumping higher than family incomes, particularly driven by foreign demand. Where Surrey has the advantage right now is that you can catch on to that fever before that happens, whether that be 5-25 years from now. This will have a cascading effect on the 1 bedroom units and in your case, you've already seen some great gains in just the last few years.

A good thing to remember is that many people will achieve some capital appreciation, and they think they made money on their home. However, true economic profit exists when you subtract your mortgage interest, property taxes, and strata fees from capital gain and what results is a net profit. Otherwise, renting would have been financially better with the returns on investments on what would have been your down payment. Since you are renting your one bedroom, you're minimizing your holding costs.

The current climate right now in Surrey is that 2 bedroom condos are the way to go if you want to sell within 5 years - for small gains. Either way, you're going long with your position if you really want to cash in on one or two bedrooms.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #82  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2015, 2:43 AM
w34lth w34lth is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 162
I believe construction begins October
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #83  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2015, 9:44 PM
GMasterAres GMasterAres is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 3,122
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cypherus View Post
I think Central City area will boom in about 10-20 years. Surrey has about 1000 new residents a month so there is demand for affordable housing. With the professional jobs in the city core, including CRA, the hospital, medical buildings, City Hall, SFU, Coast Capital Headquarters, etc. there will be demand for housing around the city core so the value will be there for many. We should also expect to see more money flowing to the South of the Fraser since Metrotown is becoming unaffordable and starting to bear the characteristics of Vancouver in the early 2000s where prices were jumping higher than family incomes, particularly driven by foreign demand. Where Surrey has the advantage right now is that you can catch on to that fever before that happens, whether that be 5-25 years from now. This will have a cascading effect on the 1 bedroom units and in your case, you've already seen some great gains in just the last few years.
I'd have to agree with you there. Surrey especially the central Surrey area has had a tough go historically in finding a "boom" situation given partially due to geography, and partially do to accurate or perceived reputation. The reputation is improving and as the region is decentralizing (no longer Vancouver centric) Surrey is no longer so far out there.

So the time is good. We're at the mercy of the global economy though as with everyone and hopefully the global and local economies remain good. I don't disagree though in the long term potential and now that buildings are rising into the skyline again, the realization of the area. Still along way to go but as I mentioned, when a lot of construction happens in a given area, you can a spiked increase in available inventory which ultimate leads to individual prices stagnating which is what is happening in the 1 and even 2 bedroom condo space.

You do see that happen everywhere even in areas like Brentwood where assessment values have remained fairly flat because of all the construction. It takes the construction to complete and units to fall off the market for the prices to start to go up.

Like I said it is the short term investors who suffer because they bank on a quick flip.

Quote:
A good thing to remember is that many people will achieve some capital appreciation, and they think they made money on their home. However, true economic profit exists when you subtract your mortgage interest, property taxes, and strata fees from capital gain and what results is a net profit. Otherwise, renting would have been financially better with the returns on investments on what would have been your down payment. Since you are renting your one bedroom, you're minimizing your holding costs.
Absolutely. Too many people that "invest" do so just because they have the money but they don't actually realize what it means to invest to make money. They don't know all the additional costs to them be it interest, property taxes, strata, etc., that you need to fully add up to = a profit when you resell.

Even with my increase in assessed value on my 1 bedroom unit that is to me fairly healthy given the current market and what I paid, if I sold factoring in all the other costs means I wouldn't be much ahead of the game thus why I am holding. And when you hold, as you stated, you want to minimize those costs.

I am more than fine even renting my unit out for less than my total costs as long as those are minimal because rent will increase over the next 5 to 10 years in the area enough to counter balance. I am lucky I can get what I get now without issue (when I advertised my unit for rent within 1 week I have 17 inquiries, 7 of which were serious and 2 of which went to background checks). The unit rented out fully in 8 days from when I advertised to them moving in and the previous tenant moving out. So I will hold for 5-10 years if need be and if that if the market stays that good.

Quote:
The current climate right now in Surrey is that 2 bedroom condos are the way to go if you want to sell within 5 years - for small gains. Either way, you're going long with your position if you really want to cash in on one or two bedrooms.
Absolutely. I do believe it is easier to rent out 1 bedrooms quicker than 2 bedrooms, but you can get more for 2s than 1s right now. 2s have a better resale but 1s are easier to rent even though there are more available.

We're still in a situation where I find the demographic moving into high-rises fit the 1-bedroom mold. Micro-lofts actually help me out with a full 1 bedroom because it now creates a lesser tier of units making even a 1 bedroom a bit more attractive.

When it is just 1 bedrooms they are the bottom of the barrel so people, if 2s are available, tend to go that route even if it is a bit more. You throw in micro-lofts and people suddenly see a flood of those and when a 1 bedroom shows up, they are happy.

Finally, there was discussion earlier about Ultra. The problem with Ultra is it was way way way way overpriced from the developer. Way too much. I looked at them way back when they started selling and they were far too high. Even the "assessment" they came back with I didn't believe at all. They show me an assessment from RBC at the time and it just so happens to be that RBC was their financial institute. I took the numbers with a huge grain of salt.

Then their sales dropped and they ended up taking forever to sell enough to get the project under way. Even after they did a few fire sale drops their prices given the area were still too rich for my blood on an investment front. I think to live in them the prices were OK but as an investment unit I had no way of recouping costs in a reasonable time.

It's nearly impossible to try to rent a unit for $200 more and tell a renter "well it has nicer crown molding!" Renters don't care about that stuff or fit-and-finish. So I kind of exclude Ultra in my gauge of how healthy the market is in Surrey Central aka I don't say because people are losing money on Ultra that reflects on the whole area.

Most other buildings were and are far more affordable from an investment perspective.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #84  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2015, 4:19 AM
Cypherus's Avatar
Cypherus Cypherus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,759
Quote:
Originally Posted by jhausner View Post
I'd have to agree with you there......
Good points and analysis of the current market situation. I think you are in a good position with renting the one bedroom. It may be worthwhile to invest in a new unit for rental purposes? After all, the game of Monopoly had it right all along that buying more property and charging rent is what makes you money, not GICs at 2%.

Interesting about Brentwood market values have been flat. I have seen this to be the case in Langley and East Surrey (Clayton area) where detached homes, condos, and townhomes are relatively stagnant in valuation as long as their is new development diluting the market. My sister in Clayton has seen her detached home go down to the level she paid for it, 8 years ago.

I have also seen this with Ultra - although some upward movement for 2 bedrooms. The 2 bedrooms on my floor (33rd physical floor) are valued at $510,000, but I know people were paying upwards of that amount 2-3 years ago, and when I inquired 2 years ago about the 2 bedroom next door to me, the sales guy said it was $479,000 plus GST (5% plus BC transitional tax at 2% since it was after the HST effective April 1, 2013). Ouch! I decided to move in and rent the one bedroom and hold off on buying.

After my landlord decided to list his one bedroom for $369,000 (assessed at $338,000), I luckily found the unit next door to be vacant and secured it for $1100 a month - 620 sq ft. Of course he did not sell and pulled it after 6 weeks from listing. Only one visitor and no offer.

Until then I am just timing the market and looking for something that we can grow and live in in case we start a family. We both want the views of the city and mountains and don't want townhouse living being squeezed in on both sides by our neighbors with screaming kids. We also both walk to work in the city core, so lifestyle is great. End off topic.

With Prime the 2 bedroom corner units appear to be priced reasonably. The problem with Prime and Urban village developments including Evolve is that your views are impeded by next door towers that are soon to be constructed. It was the deal breaker for me at Evolve when I realized the mech house at waive will be my view. In this case, Reliance will build a tower to the north of Prime so those north facing units are a no go for me.

Also, renting out the units in Prime may not be an easy task. With Ultra units always available, it seems, when you search craiglist, Wave, University district tower, Park avenue, and 3 civic plaza will also add to the rental inventory and there will be a lot of competition in the rental market. For another $200 - $300 more per month, some people will just opt for the 1 bedroom instead of the microsuite. Also, many SFU and KPU students tend to live at home so the demand for Prime micro suites may not be the case. I walk to work every morning from Ultra and honestly don't see SFU students carrying textbooks or laptops. I see them coming from the bus station and sky train. The sales team in every condo development are great for painting this rosy picture of the future. It's their job.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #85  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2015, 3:43 PM
w34lth w34lth is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 162
A friend of mine went to purchase a micro-2 but they were all sold out.

Only Corner 2 bedroom left, a couple town houses and the 398sqft micros which they now added sliding glass doors to.

I personally wasn't a fan of the 2 beds... felt kind of cramped.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #86  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2015, 1:09 AM
Cypherus's Avatar
Cypherus Cypherus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,759
Quote:
Originally Posted by w34lth View Post
A friend of mine went to purchase a micro-2 but they were all sold out.

Only Corner 2 bedroom left, a couple town houses and the 398sqft micros which they now added sliding glass doors to.

I personally wasn't a fan of the 2 beds... felt kind of cramped.
Yes I noticed that the 2 bedrooms had their dining room tables in the living room. Not really the greatest floor plans for the space.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #87  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2015, 1:21 AM
w34lth w34lth is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 162
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cypherus View Post
Yes I noticed that the 2 bedrooms had their dining room tables in the living room. Not really the greatest floor plans for the space.
The townhouses seemed nice for mid 300's.

However I couldn't buy one as a pre-sale. I would need to do a walk-thru first.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #88  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2015, 6:00 AM
GMasterAres GMasterAres is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 3,122
Are the townhouse 3 bedroom? How many square feet? Mid-300s is surprising given every other new townhouse int hat area is going for $500,000+... that's a good price if they are 3 bedroom and 12-1300 sq ft.

I'm glad I'm not the only one thinking the 2 bedrooms are strange not just in this development. It seems the 1-bedrooms have increased in average size (just over 600 sq ft) but where you used to see 900-1000 sq.ft 2 bedrooms they are shrinking so you get these 700-800 sq.ft 2 bedroom. Makes the bedrooms either just too small for my liking or like you said, they cram a few rooms together awkwardly.

I think every bedroom should be able to fit a king size bed and at least a couple end-tables or it is just too small. Seems they are shrinking them to only fit a queen if that in the newer highrises going up.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #89  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2015, 2:36 PM
w34lth w34lth is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 162
Quote:
Originally Posted by jhausner View Post
Are the townhouse 3 bedroom? How many square feet? Mid-300s is surprising given every other new townhouse int hat area is going for $500,000+... that's a good price if they are 3 bedroom and 12-1300 sq ft.

I'm glad I'm not the only one thinking the 2 bedrooms are strange not just in this development. It seems the 1-bedrooms have increased in average size (just over 600 sq ft) but where you used to see 900-1000 sq.ft 2 bedrooms they are shrinking so you get these 700-800 sq.ft 2 bedroom. Makes the bedrooms either just too small for my liking or like you said, they cram a few rooms together awkwardly.

I think every bedroom should be able to fit a king size bed and at least a couple end-tables or it is just too small. Seems they are shrinking them to only fit a queen if that in the newer highrises going up.
There were a few options for the TH. - I did like the roof top terraces.

980-1027sqft - 383,900 - 3B/3B

Then the 2B would vary from as low as 349,900 to - 385k - max size was 855sqft.

I found the bathroom in the 2 bed super cramped (show suite)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #90  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2015, 3:59 PM
GMasterAres GMasterAres is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 3,122
Yah that just seems super cramped. I'm just not sure with developers these days. Makes sense though money is their motivator not comfort. I don't blame the architects because quite honestly I'm sure they are all told "Cram as many individual units into the building as you can!" so the only way is to make super tight units.

I'd hate though to buy a 2 bedroom and the size makes it kind of just turn into a 1 bedroom with an office. Personally I think 2 bedrooms should be at least 900 sq ft minimum and 3 bedrooms 1200 sq ft minimum. But they'd lose probably 120 units in a highrise if they did that and that's basically $20 million.

As long as people buy them I guess. It makes those larger apartments of equal room count in other towers worth just that much more on the market I think.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #91  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2015, 4:24 PM
w34lth w34lth is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 162
Quote:
Originally Posted by jhausner View Post
Yah that just seems super cramped. I'm just not sure with developers these days. Makes sense though money is their motivator not comfort. I don't blame the architects because quite honestly I'm sure they are all told "Cram as many individual units into the building as you can!" so the only way is to make super tight units.

I'd hate though to buy a 2 bedroom and the size makes it kind of just turn into a 1 bedroom with an office. Personally I think 2 bedrooms should be at least 900 sq ft minimum and 3 bedrooms 1200 sq ft minimum. But they'd lose probably 120 units in a highrise if they did that and that's basically $20 million.

As long as people buy them I guess. It makes those larger apartments of equal room count in other towers worth just that much more on the market I think.
You are right. Or they will advertise it as a 2 bedroom when it is really a den.

I understand the end result is to be profitable however 800sqft for a 2 bed is tiny. Especially in a townhouse!

Last edited by w34lth; Jul 10, 2015 at 5:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #92  
Old Posted Aug 4, 2015, 4:46 PM
w34lth w34lth is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 162
any updates on this project?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #93  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2015, 7:11 PM
w34lth w34lth is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 162
Taken Today

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #94  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2015, 3:18 AM
Shift Shift is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,944
"Construction has commenced"

Sorry but this site has seen no action aside from that fence going up back in the spring.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #95  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2015, 7:22 AM
GMasterAres GMasterAres is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 3,122
Someone said October earlier. When in October I guess is the question if at all. Haven't even cleared the trees I don't think have they? Regardless this site tags construction as when the first concrete is poured so we're likely 6 months away from that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #96  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2015, 10:54 PM
w34lth w34lth is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 162
I am curious what will or if anything will be built between university district and prime.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #97  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2015, 12:45 AM
Cypherus's Avatar
Cypherus Cypherus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,759
Quote:
Originally Posted by w34lth View Post
I am curious what will or if anything will be built between university district and prime.
Came accross the future plan some time ago. I am not sure how accurate it will be, but Prime is rendered and the Urban Village towers along with University tower and Wave towers 1 and 2 are properly represented.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #98  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2015, 2:54 AM
Shift Shift is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,944
There are no applications in process for the lots between Prime and Bosa, so that rendering is purely speculative. The only thing to go by is the City Centre Plan which designates the area as 5.5 FAR Mixed-Use. And even that can be amended..

I would expect another residential tower with street-front retail given thats the pattern already being established by Bosa and Prime. Potentially some office given the proximity to Civic Square / Central City / City Hall.. and because this area is evolving into Surrey's 'CBD' if it were to have one.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #99  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2015, 8:34 PM
w34lth w34lth is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 162
Word is ground will be breaking in the next couple weeks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #100  
Old Posted Oct 7, 2015, 11:59 PM
GMasterAres GMasterAres is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 3,122
Werd from the Universe!

Will be nice to see but I'll believe it when I see it like every project in Surrey Central. I am after-all a realist by nature.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:02 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.