Quote:
Originally Posted by vanman
Richmond has enough midrises to more than make up for the rest of the metro. Besides, wide and squat towers are what block the most views, not tall and slender ones.
|
Those aren't midrises, they're stumpy high-rises... the worst kind. I mean mid-rises with a distinctly mid-rise typology even if they're as tall as the ones in Richmond.

archdaily.net, profurniture.info
www.colourbox.com, arcspace.com/
Lower-quality versions of the above are much more justified in medium-density centers like Coquitlam or Surrey, compared to a tower-in-a-park that has the same density, but mars the landscape with a bland tower that no one can avoid seeing. Historically, to build high meant ambition, and exclusivity, hence they only things poking out of the skyline are of good quality. Now that it's easy to build up, it translates to repeating floorplates and cheap views for all. That's a tragedy as far as aesthetics go.