HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3641  
Old Posted Sep 8, 2010, 10:54 PM
steveve's Avatar
steveve steveve is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by koops65 View Post
Driving in from K-W, they seem close to each other to me...
sorry but, where's K-W?
__________________
Visualizing the future of Toronto's urban centres Website @FutureModelTO
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3642  
Old Posted Sep 8, 2010, 11:06 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,207
by me

Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3643  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2010, 12:32 AM
koops65's Avatar
koops65 koops65 is offline
Intergalactic Barfly
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Quarks Bar
Posts: 8,528
Quote:
Originally Posted by steveve View Post
sorry but, where's K-W?
That would be Kitchener/Waterloo, 1 hour west of Toronto...

P.S. How are your geography lessons going? Having trouble in that area?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3644  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2010, 1:01 AM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,207
steveve, you do drugs dont you?

Or you're like just naturally stoned, or something... I remember when I was you age, there was this really popular show from KW (Kitchener-Waterloo). With some German guy pretending to be some kid friendly Captian Kangaroo. Anyways, from the time I was like 8, I knew where Kitchener was....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3645  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2010, 4:40 AM
Locked In's Avatar
Locked In Locked In is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,977
Some photos of the Hotel Georgia taken by me today - around 14 stories + mechanical to go:


Full Size


Full Size


Full Size

My photo from last week:


Full Size
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3646  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2010, 10:32 AM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,207
THAT CLADDING IS SICKK!

I also love the shape of the building. But honestly, that is some of the best cladding Ive ever seen go on any Tower built recently.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3647  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2010, 12:54 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,855
Agree on the cladding however, the shape has never done anything for me. I do like slopes 'n angles but I guess not when they are forced onto a box.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3648  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2010, 2:53 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 68,773
Photos from 'ricolance21' and SSP







reflection and a finished ATB top
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3649  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2010, 3:54 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,207
Nice Epcor Update.. cladding again is a winner!!!

Here is an update from the TIFF Tower by interchange42 at UT and comentary by Doug Convoy from inside the Development Team at the Bell Lightbox.


Quote:
Originally Posted by interchange42 View Post
tiff. | Bell Lightbox is finally here and the embargo on publication has been lifted! Over the next week, Urban Toronto will be giving you insider access to this long-awaited, new heart of Toronto's internationally-acclaimed film community. Our exhaustive tour will be taking you into spaces big and small, from top to bottom, inside and out. So, stay tuned.

For now, here's a teaser of recent exterior images and interior pics taken in early August showing Lightbox still under construction. Enjoy.

Text by Doug Convoy Photos by Interchange42






Main atrium looking west toward Master Control.




Main atrium looking east.




Atrium for TIFF offices.




Luma Restaurant and Blackberry Lounge.




Cinema One.




Way more detail and lots of photos are coming over the next week!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3650  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2010, 3:59 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 68,773
TIFF is quite nice although the massing is too heavy for me.

As for EPCOR, i wish the glazing was more translucent. I do love the balconies on each floor and their clear glass railings.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3651  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2010, 4:22 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,207
All the diva's at UT are complaining about the massing, but it has to serve many purposes mainly, being a showcase, showroom for the worlds top movie stars, and it has to hold 5 theaters. There was no way to do this without being "Heavy"

I'm sure in time, it will coax into it surroundings better when the other similarly sized developments go up all around it, including 5 Mercer to the South, and Pinnacle behind it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3652  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2010, 4:45 PM
Traynor's Avatar
Traynor Traynor is offline
Back to Basics
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,226
Quote:
Originally Posted by caltrane74 View Post
All the diva's at UT are complaining about the massing, but it has to serve many purposes mainly, being a showcase, showroom for the worlds top movie stars, and it has to hold 5 theaters. There was no way to do this without being "Heavy"...
Really Cal? Absolutely NO WAY? Are you buying in to what the developers are cramming down your throat?

How about 3 of those theatres being built completely underground? A theatre doesn't need windows after all.

Or perhaps building the podium slightly taller but incorporating major setbacks to better fit in with the street. (Same square footage, but arranged differently.)

There are probably hundreds of ways this could have been made less intrusive and yet be sexier and more "Hollywood".

Like giving the tiff entrance some grandeur, as it deserves. Instead of a looking like a shopping-mall fire exit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3653  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2010, 5:00 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 68,773
^bingo.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3654  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2010, 5:12 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,207
You guys seem to be forgetting that this building also has to accomodate a condo tower on top, barely got enough financing to get off the ground, and has to deal with the parking demands of the owners of the condo units which also partially financed construction.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3655  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2010, 5:21 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 68,773
^well then that makes a mediocre podium acceptable then.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3656  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2010, 5:28 PM
Traynor's Avatar
Traynor Traynor is offline
Back to Basics
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,226
The more you "excuse" a developer the more (or less) they will get away with. By being critical and vociferous of those critiques, you hold their feet to the fire and demand better from them.

It's the law of entropy in action here. The less they offer, the less we expect, the less we expect, the less they offer and so on. You end up with a whole lot of "indifference and complacency".

That is not good enough.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3657  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2010, 5:38 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 68,773
I should say the podium is not a disaster, but they could have relieved some of its midriff with some design choices.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3658  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2010, 5:38 PM
Traynor's Avatar
Traynor Traynor is offline
Back to Basics
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,226
These interiors are reminiscent of any number of museum interior designs from the 90's.

And what were they thinking with this?

I want to take a giant hammer and smash it, because the design of this building is a fashion emergency!



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3659  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2010, 5:40 PM
Ramako's Avatar
Ramako Ramako is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,409
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
^well then that makes a mediocre podium acceptable then.
Do you really consider that podium medicore though? The massing may not be your cup of tea (though I happen to love massive streetwall forming podiums), but on pure aesthetics it has a lot going for it. It's probably one of the most visually engaging ever built in Toronto. I'm not just talking about the lighting, signage and scrolling ticker, but the various module components and textures, and the way they interact with sunlight.


By: current at UT


By: spaced at UT
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3660  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2010, 5:49 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 68,773
^I do... again not terrible by any stretch, but not that welcoming and grandiose. I would have loved to see a 2 storey glass wall rather than a large soffit overhang... and would it have killed them to incorporate some color or art on the front of the glazing? It is so grey cloud.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:26 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.