Two councillors want to put brakes on Baker Street library proposal
Billings, Kovach say final cost could be too high for taxpayers
November 21, 2007
LAURA THOMPSON - MERCURY STAFF - GUELPH

It's Time To Renew! buttons have been created to promote the move to a new home for the main branch of the library.
City staff will discuss plans for the new central library today after city council voted earlier this week to name the Baker Street site as the preferred location.
But at least two councillors want to halt the project out of concern taxpayers may end up footing much of the bill.
There is no price tag attached to the development at the moment. Early estimates pegged it between $16 million for the library only and $33 million for a building that includes a library, future library expansion and commercial space, according to a consultant's report released in May.
But David Corks, downtown economic development manager, said those estimates are out of date now that the plans include the integration of a new library, municipal parkade and commercial, office and residential mixed-use space.
"The bottom line is we have no idea what this will cost," he said, explaining the purpose of Monday's meeting was for council to decide on a location. He said staff will have a better idea of costs once the terms of reference are completed and a request for tenders goes out in the new year.
"That's the whole purpose of the request for proposals. It's just that. It's a proposal. We're not committing to build," he said.
The city has earmarked $17.3 million in the 2011 capital budget for a new main library.
Councillor Christine Billings said that's not enough to build what city staff are proposing. She speculates the costs are far greater.
"How are we going to pay for it? Where are we going to get the rest?" she asked. "Ballpark -- it's going to climb to $50 million because they want to see a commercial element, parkade and the library. Even without residential, we're looking at a project of $50 million."
Billings voted against the staff recommendation along with Coun. Gloria Kovach. Coun. Ian Findlay abstained from the vote because of a perceived conflict of interest -- he owns a DVD rental store across the street from the Baker Street site and the library would loan out DVDs.
Kovach said she doesn't think the city can afford a new main library branch with so many other capital projects on the books.
"All these things are wonderful, but we can't afford it. We've got waste management issues. We have some health requirements for a health facility," she said. "I just think the citizens of Guelph can't afford this."
These issues were raised at Monday's council meeting, as were concerns about missed opportunities.
In February 2005, council voted against purchasing the Wyndham Street post office, which would have housed the main library. The building is now home to Wellington County's Ontario Works. The city could have bought the historic building for about $1 million. It would have cost another $1 to $1.2 million in renovations for interim staff use, and $17.3 million to convert the building into a library.
But Coun. Bob Bell, who supported Monday's motion, said that's all water under the bridge. But he wants to be sure this time around the library initiative moves forward.
"I'm cautious about the magnitude of the project, but I think the location on the Baker Street parking lot with possible access to Wyndham Street is a good direction to go in," he said.
He said his preference is an integrated project that would see the library, parkade and residential space built together. But he'd also like a second option to move forward with each individual component in the case that one proves weaker than the others, he said.
"If we don't have the ability to move forward independently, we may not move forward at all."
Corks said an option to mitigate capital costs would be to enter into a long-term lease with the site's developer, who would own the actual building but not the land.
Norm McLeod, chief librarian for Guelph Public Library, said that's been done before with three other branches around the city.
"We've been able to justify the lease cost because we couldn't afford to buy the land, we couldn't afford to build a building," he said.
He said it's feasible that the same concept could be applied to the new main library.
"It's clearly an issue where the art of the deal is absolutely critical."
No need to postpone Baker Street library
November 23, 2007
Mary Mulholland
Dear Editor - Re: "Two councillors want to put brakes on Baker Street library proposal" (Guelph Mercury, Nov. 21).
While it is encouraging and exciting that city council has chosen Baker Street for the new central library, it is sad to read that councillors Christine Billings and Gloria Kovach would like further delays.
Guelph has more than doubled in population since the 1960s, when the current library was built, and it is destined to grow much more. This library project has been overdue (pardon the pun) for years now. Any postponement would be robbing the citizens of Guelph of a much-needed community facility and thwarting the revitalization of our beautiful and historic downtown. Any postponement would end up costing us a great deal more.
It is interesting to note that the two councillors who are against the project were part of the former anti-library city council that so unwisely lost us the downtown post office at a bargain price.
We need to remember that a library is the one public facility that is open to all. Its riches are available free of charge to everyone in the city. Let us look to the future this time and move forward at last with a fine new building for all of us to enjoy.
Mary Mulholland,
Guelph
Build a central park at the Baker Street site
November 24, 2007
Craig Chamberlain
Dear Editor - Re: "Two councillors want to put brakes on Baker Street library proposal" (Guelph Mercury, Nov. 21).
David Corks, the city's downtown economic manager, is quoted as saying, "The bottom line is we have no idea what this will cost," regarding the Baker Street library proposal. The important question is, "What is council willing to pay?
At what dollar value do councillors begin to push away from the table, saying, "No way, I'm out"?
The problem with the Baker Street proposal has perhaps more to do with council's energy for it than the actual site, as problematic as it is.
The problem with the proposal is council is unduly invested in making it work, which means the project will be overly vision-driven, with budgetary considerations downplayed in the name of "our legacy."
Council lacks the necessary detachment on this issue to objectively evaluate the costs and constraints to locating a large public building in an area with real access issues. Mitigating the constraints will be expensive and the costs and benefits will not be in scale with the need to have a main library there.
For the record, something completely counterintuitive could be done with the Baker Street site, which is prime real-estate. Something of enduring value, which would set Guelph apart long after other municipalities have built mixed-use libraries/ residences/ parkades of their own in their core, when what we have looks rather common. Build a park -- yes, a park, Central Park-- an anchor for the intensity we are planning, a place to gather, a place for reading, writing, being, belonging.
Craig Chamberlain,
Guelph