HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #781  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2007, 2:16 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,900
Quote:
Originally Posted by brian_b View Post

2) A survey team was out marking up the sidewalk and concrete at the northwest corner of Grand and LaSalle. The site is fenced off. It looks like it's an empty lot that used to have a gas station on it. Anyone know what is planned for this site?
*pulls out Google Earth empty lot placemarks*

That would be Quadrangle Tower.
     
     
  #782  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2007, 2:28 AM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,946
Just finished viewing that massive update (thanks!).

I'm still waiting to see 600 N Fairbanks' facade
     
     
  #783  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2007, 2:48 AM
Sir Isaac Newton Sir Isaac Newton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 315
Wow, Avenue East looks really crazy with the colored bricks. I can't tell if I will end up thinking that it looks really tacky and cheesy or if it looks extremely cool and original.
     
     
  #784  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2007, 2:57 AM
BorisMolotov's Avatar
BorisMolotov BorisMolotov is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 548
^ ^

I dont think those are bricks. They're the papers that construction companies use to cover exposed surfaces and insulation.
     
     
  #785  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2007, 3:32 AM
SolarWind's Avatar
SolarWind SolarWind is offline
Chicago
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,629
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaron38 View Post
Braving hypothermia, I made a walking tour of downtown today. All photos of the big boys are in their respective individual threads.
Roughly, from South to North...
Great update aaron38! Looks like you covered a lot of ground today. I especially like seeing the projects south of Monroe. I rarely venture much beyond that point when I head out for lunch/sightseeing.
     
     
  #786  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2007, 3:46 AM
pherek pherek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 80
Great job Aaron38, thanks for the photos. I can't believe you covered all that ground when it was fuh-reezing today. Nice organization too.
     
     
  #787  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2007, 4:23 AM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is offline
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 30,228
aaron38, you deserve a million SSP bonus points for going out in these frigid temps and getting those wonderful pics of all them projects, and on your day off no less. kudos! you're one hell of a dedicated skyscraper construction fan.
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a marvelous middle ground for many middle class families.
     
     
  #788  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2007, 5:24 AM
Jaroslaw's Avatar
Jaroslaw Jaroslaw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Seoul
Posts: 1,792
Bandwidth exceeded! (If you use the image resizer from Microsoft Powertoys, you could shrink the photos from 600 to 200kB...)
__________________
Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam
     
     
  #789  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2007, 5:25 AM
Monkey36 Monkey36 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 72
Here's a pic of Quadrangle Tower that I found:

     
     
  #790  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2007, 6:38 AM
aaron38's Avatar
aaron38 aaron38 is offline
312
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Palatine
Posts: 4,335
The bandwidth problem's been fixed for all images on all threads. Yeah Jaroslaw, I forgot to shrink the pics before posting them. They're 90% smaller now.
(Yeah, they were that big)
     
     
  #791  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2007, 7:09 AM
Jaroslaw's Avatar
Jaroslaw Jaroslaw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Seoul
Posts: 1,792
Nice new angles! These photos give the impression that it's cold in Chicago. Nice to cool down while looking at them...

Quote:
Originally Posted by SamInTheLoop View Post
I do think 50 E. Chestnut is a design that works well for this particular infill site, but I have to disagree regarding its appropriateness for a site overlooking the parks - I am completely, wholeheartedly embracing the city's
return to its modernist roots (predominance of glass)...
Well, the city also has pre-modernist roots, the art deco, the nouveau, the masonry and brick... it would be good if there were some buildings that extended that further, painted concrete is NOT the way to do it. And that yellow McCaffrey rental tower (or even the Fordham or the Park Hyatt) po-mo stuff is not it either, of course. Maybe that tradition is dead???

On the other hand, the glass tradition has been going so strong... 1720 S Mich will look awesome. I think a lot of it has to do with how 30-40 years ago you had to make glass dark to give it anti-uv properties, and now you can do it with more transparent glass. A problem I have with things like the Daley or the IBM is that the glass doesn't look... glassy enough.
__________________
Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam
     
     
  #792  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2007, 7:18 AM
Nowhereman1280 Nowhereman1280 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pungent Onion, Illinois
Posts: 8,423
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaroslaw View Post
These photos give the impression that it's cold in Chicago. Nice to cool down while looking at them...
Ay, that it is! Supposed to be a high of 7 or something on Sunday and Monday, something about record low temps for February...

Speaking of the cold, how cold would it have to get for the engineers working on concrete buildings to start getting worried about doing pours? Or would they have to stop working because its too cold for the workers before it got that cold?

(PS I know concrete generates a lot of heat, but there has to be a limit before the cold shuts down the calcification reaction)
     
     
  #793  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2007, 7:28 AM
Chicago Shawn's Avatar
Chicago Shawn Chicago Shawn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,829
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVictor1 View Post
Sorry dude, not me, and I am going to have to totally disagree with you on this one and go with Honte. There might be a number of these across the city, but they are classic and already have character. I don't think they should be demolished.

Height and density aren't everything, not even close to the lake.
I know what you mean, but there are plenty of classic brick walk ups and courtyard buildings all over Lakeview, and quite a lot of them within a five minute walk of this site. This is not the low-rise part of lakeview, its extreme eastern Lakeview, whose charachter is dominated by the LSD street wall. Granted, the design leaves some to be desired, but I am looking forward to adding some bulk to that part of the skyline and some more density to add some revenue to the CTA fairboxes on the multiple buses running up and down LSD.

Don't get me wrong, its a nice building and all, but its really not anything special. I guess we will just have to agree to disagree.
     
     
  #794  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2007, 12:40 PM
Chi_Coruscant Chi_Coruscant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 485
http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-0702010172feb01,0,525125.story?coll=chi-business-hed
6-tower project planned
$750 million residential complex set for area that housed Kinzie Station


By Susan Diesenhouse
Tribune staff reporter

February 1, 2007

A Chicago-based developer intends to build a $750 million residential project near downtown that it said will have enough scope and variety to be a new neighborhood.

Fifield Cos. is set Thursday to unveil finalized plans for a community called K Station that would link the West Loop and River North districts. It would include six residential towers with 2,451 luxury apartments, parking for 2,000 vehicles and 40,000 square feet of retail space, plus a Jewel/Osco supermarket.

The project would include a one-acre public park, walkways and five outdoor swimming pools, among other amenities.

The company already is building the first two apartment buildings in the project. Over the next five to seven years it would complete work on all six towers, which will range in size from 30 to 43 stories. They will rise on the eight-acre site that long ago housed Kinzie Station, a commuter rail stop, the developer said.

The location is bounded by Kinzie, Clinton, Halsted and Wayman Streets, Fifield said.

The city approved the broad concepts for the planned development last spring but it has taken several months to fill in vital details, including the size of the project.

"We're taking one of the last available tracts of undeveloped land in the West Loop to create a new neighborhood," said Steve Fifield, chairman and chief executive of the Fifield Cos., whose joint venture partner for the project is Pacific Life Insurance Co.

For the city, the addition of new rental apartments should be a boon, said Leslie Andren, a senior director for multifamily capital markets at Cushman & Wakefield of Illinois Inc.

"The city needs rental housing units because there's been more taken off the market in recent years for condominium conversion than put back in," she said.

In the past 15 years downtown has lost about 15,000 rental units, she estimated.

For a developer, this may be a good time to put up apartment buildings. Occupancy is strong at 96.9 percent, rents are rising, landlords are cutting back on concessions such as free rent, the city is creating new jobs and well-located sites are scarce, she said.

Meanwhile, there isn't a rush of new rental buildings in development because barriers to entry are substantial. It can take two years to find a site, secure city approvals and financing and get construction under way. With the rising cost of building materials and labor, condominium high-rises can cost around $400 a square foot to develop and rentals about $300, much more than the approximately $200 per square foot to purchase some existing multifamily properties, Andren said.

As a result, this year less than 1,000 new rental apartments are scheduled for completion, far fewer than prospective downtown dwellers could absorb, said Fifield President Rick Cavenaugh.

Furthermore, the 27 percent decline in the sale of new housing, including converted condominiums, through the third quarter of 2006 means that some potential buyers are likely to rent until they are sure the market is rebounding.

If the housing market does spring back in coming years, one or two of the K Station towers might be developed as condominiums. There is reason to speculate, given the surge of new downtown residents in recent years.

From 2000 though 2005 a downtown condominium boom was fueled by eager young professionals and empty nesters who bought housing and now patronize the new shops, restaurants and entertainment venues that opened nearby.

Much of the residential development has centered around the West and South Loop. Since 1991 the total number of downtown housing units doubled to approximately 100,000 while those in the South Loop tripled to 13,500, according to Appraisal Research Counselors, an appraisal and consulting firm.

Given such ebullient activity, just three months ago another Chicago developer, Centrum Properties Inc. kicked off the Roosevelt Collection, an approximately $900 million mixed-use project in the South Loop. It is slated to have about 1,000 condominiums, parking for 1,700 cars, 400,000 square feet of retail and a 2.5-acre park.

The West Loop has been another hot spot of downtown development. Since 1991 the number of housing units has more than quadrupled to approximately 14,000 from 2,900. There have also been several new office buildings. In the past eight years Fifield has produced four of the new office towers as well as two residential projects not related to K Station.

Last fall it completed construction on the first 37-story tower of the K Station neighborhood called Left Bank. Since November the 451-unit building, designed by Chicago-based DeStefano & Partners, has leased 90 units that on average rent for $2.29 per square foot with no concessions, said Cavenaugh.

Fifield developed it with a unit of Prudential Insurance Co. and expects to close on the sale of its interest to Prudential on Wednesday. It declined to state the price.

"We are a merchant builder and will probably sell some K Station buildings and keep two or three for the long term," said Cavenaugh

Also in November Fifield started construction of the second 39-story K Station tower, with 350 units, designed by Pappageorge/Haymes Architects, due for completion by mid-2008.

A month ago the developer closed on the last four acres of the site, which it purchased from a Chicago-based subsidiary of Heartland Partners LP, successor to the Milwaukee Railroad.

This fall Fifield will break ground for a third 422-unit rental building, Cavenaugh said.

Apartments will range from studios to three bedrooms. Average rent for a 750-square-foot one-bedroom will be $1,710 and for a 1,050-square-foot two-bedroom about $2,400.

Fifield said that the project design and features, like the playground, performance stage, walking paths and sculpture, will create "a community that will provide residents with a sense of arrival and belonging."
     
     
  #795  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2007, 1:09 PM
BorisMolotov's Avatar
BorisMolotov BorisMolotov is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 548
Do we know what the third building is?
     
     
  #796  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2007, 2:02 PM
brian_b brian_b is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,572
Quote:
Originally Posted by DANTHEDISCOMAN View Post
So do you mean they were surveying just the sidewalk or the actual lot that is fenced off too? I can't wait for this site to be redevoloped, it is the worst hands down in all river north.
They were doing the whole site, from what I could see while I waited at the intersection.
     
     
  #797  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2007, 2:09 PM
Jaroslaw's Avatar
Jaroslaw Jaroslaw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Seoul
Posts: 1,792
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chi_Coruscant View Post
http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-0702010172feb01,0,525125.story?coll=chi-business-hed
6-tower project planned
$750 million residential complex set for area that housed Kinzie Station


The project would include a one-acre public park, walkways and five outdoor swimming pools, among other amenities.

With the rising cost of building materials and labor, condominium high-rises can cost around $400 a square foot to develop and rentals about $300, much more than the approximately $200 per square foot to purchase some existing multifamily properties, Andren said.
"Walkways" meaning what? Sidewalks? And FIVE "swimming pools", or rather "water features suitable for human immersion"? One *real* swimming pool would be better...

Can anyone closer to the trade comment on the $300-400 figure? If this keeps rising, it's bad news.
__________________
Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam
     
     
  #798  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2007, 3:40 PM
VivaLFuego's Avatar
VivaLFuego VivaLFuego is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Blue Island
Posts: 6,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by BorisMolotov View Post
Do we know what the third building is?
I assume 360 N. Union will be the one starting this fall. It's a good location for a tower, it will provide a northern terminus for the view coming up I-90/94 before it veers west into Hubbard's cave.

That said, great news that Fifield is plowing ahead, this land is horribly underutilized and is a great spot for some high density. I also like how there are fewer parking spaces than units planned...
     
     
  #799  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2007, 8:21 PM
Tom Servo's Avatar
Tom Servo Tom Servo is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,646
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monkey36 View Post
Here's a pic of Quadrangle Tower that I found:

I like this.
     
     
  #800  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2007, 8:29 PM
Taft Taft is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 638
Quote:
Originally Posted by VivaLFuego View Post
That said, great news that Fifield is plowing ahead, this land is horribly underutilized and is a great spot for some high density. I also like how there are fewer parking spaces than units planned...
Being so close to the loop and transportation it would be a travesty if this *wasn't* true. Our collective bar is so damn low...



Taft
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:46 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.