HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #101  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2005, 3:00 PM
rds70 rds70 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 2,811
Awesome building!!!!

I love this quote from the Denver Post article:

Osborn Development Corp. has secured options to buy adjacent lots on which it hopes to build an urban village with roughly 150,000 square feet of office and retail space and 1,000 homes, Angela Osborn said today.

That could equate to 4 or 5 other buildings of similar size.....

Last edited by rds70; Jul 24, 2005 at 3:40 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #102  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2005, 3:43 PM
InfillJunkie
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Wow 1000 homes. This is just incredible!!! I hope they have a website showing happy urban people doing happy urban things.

I am really waiting to see what Cirrus says about the design. LOL.


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #103  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2005, 3:50 PM
DenverInfill's Avatar
DenverInfill DenverInfill is offline
mmmm... infillicious!
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Lower Highland, Denver
Posts: 3,357
I'm sorry, Mr. Junkie, but that's my line! I copyrighted it so please don't use it any more. Thank you.

The downtown residential developer's marketing strategy: Show lots of pictures of "happy urban people doing happy urban things" ©
__________________
~ Ken

DenverInfill Blog
DenverUrbanism
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #104  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2005, 3:53 PM
InfillJunkie
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
GASP!!! Oh...and what if I do use it again? huh? Are you going to sue me?? BRING IT!!!



Oh and that's copyright..not copywrite! Hmph!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #105  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2005, 3:55 PM
DenverInfill's Avatar
DenverInfill DenverInfill is offline
mmmm... infillicious!
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Lower Highland, Denver
Posts: 3,357
I'll have my attorney give you a call!

__________________
~ Ken

DenverInfill Blog
DenverUrbanism
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #106  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2005, 3:56 PM
InfillJunkie
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Oh puhlease even my 80 year old momma can woop your attorneys buttocks! LOL
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #107  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2005, 3:59 PM
Giovoni Giovoni is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,452
It seems like Denver hit some sort of critical mass or city improvement about 3 or 4 years ago or somthing. Now you can almost set your calendar to expect a major construction announcement every month. If so much goes wrong that only 1/3 of these buildings go up the skyline will STILL be dramatically different...

If they all get built then pretty soon there won't be any surface lots left for trophy HQ towers

how very very sad
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #108  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2005, 4:00 PM
InfillJunkie
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
We have quite a few surface parking lots left thats for sure. Especially a couple on 17th that would be great places for trophy office towers.

But you're right Gio...one day....there will not be a one left to develop. OH HAPPY DAY!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #109  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2005, 4:01 PM
DenverInfill's Avatar
DenverInfill DenverInfill is offline
mmmm... infillicious!
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Lower Highland, Denver
Posts: 3,357
Trophy HQ towers are so twentieth century! It's all about mixed-use residential towers, and that's what we're getting! Woo hoo!!


Yeah, but if we develop all the empty lots, then we won't need DenverInfill anymore. That's sad.
__________________
~ Ken

DenverInfill Blog
DenverUrbanism
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #110  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2005, 4:02 PM
Giovoni Giovoni is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,452
yeah the surface lots comment ws really a joke.. but the skyline changing that's pretty much assured at this point I think.

Actually with all this noise I think it's time for Mr Moore to dust off his Trango Tower plans..
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #111  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2005, 4:16 PM
pablosan pablosan is offline
Up Up and Away
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 2,728
This project will definately infuse a great deal of energy into that part of downtown. Having an urban village with more residential towers would be awesome.
__________________
DenZone
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #112  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2005, 4:22 PM
cramer_3's Avatar
cramer_3 cramer_3 is offline
Harumph
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Denver Dry Bldg.
Posts: 111
Great great tower. Awesome. However, I am having a problem with figuring out which streets are which on the rendering. Can anyone help me out with that?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #113  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2005, 4:23 PM
DenverInfill's Avatar
DenverInfill DenverInfill is offline
mmmm... infillicious!
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Lower Highland, Denver
Posts: 3,357


Let's not forget about that handy site, DenverInfill, for just these kinds of questions!

The front corner of the building in the rendering is the bottom corner in the aerial at 20th & Lincoln.
__________________
~ Ken

DenverInfill Blog
DenverUrbanism
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #114  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2005, 4:29 PM
pablosan pablosan is offline
Up Up and Away
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 2,728
I think that is the perfect location for a tower of this stature.
__________________
DenZone
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #115  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2005, 5:30 PM
MileHighCJ's Avatar
MileHighCJ MileHighCJ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: San Francisco - SoMa
Posts: 202
That location will make it really change that area of the skyline from a distance, and it will look really impressive as you drive down 20th Ave towards downtown!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #116  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2005, 6:27 PM
glowrock's Avatar
glowrock glowrock is offline
Becoming Chicago-fied!
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chicago (West Avondale)
Posts: 19,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcp
wow...OMFG....as we've all said before ~ could be an amazing TOD.

where's this info coming from Wong? and are you forumer of the week?

multi-billion feels like 4 - 5 buildings to me....Mhays will probably have a good sense of it.
Forumer of the week? How about forumer of the month? Nah, all the info's in the paper today... (Saw it online, since I'm still out here in SC right now...)

Awesome news, though! And the rendering looks fantastic!

Aaron (Glowrock)
__________________
"Deeply corrupt but still semi-functional - it's the Chicago way." -- Barrelfish
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #117  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2005, 6:32 PM
glowrock's Avatar
glowrock glowrock is offline
Becoming Chicago-fied!
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chicago (West Avondale)
Posts: 19,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by rds70
Awsome building!!!!

I love this quote from the Denver Post article:

Osborn Development Corp. has secured options to buy adjacent lots on which it hopes to build an urban village with roughly 150,000 square feet of office and retail space and 1,000 homes, Angela Osborn said today.

That could equate to 4 or 5 other buildings of similar size.....
This could quite possibly be the best news to happen here for DECADES! Yippee!!!

Wow, it's simply amazing how much has been announced for Denver in the last few months. Absolutely incredible!

Aaron (Glowrock)
__________________
"Deeply corrupt but still semi-functional - it's the Chicago way." -- Barrelfish
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #118  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2005, 6:34 PM
Cirrus's Avatar
Cirrus Cirrus is offline
cities|transit|croissants
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 18,718
I like it.

The base, particularly, is quite good. The fenestration could use a little bit of work in a number of places and the transition from the shaft to the curved roof needs to be a little bit more substantial (brackets would do to trick, I think). I’m actually a tad conflicted about the curved roof. I think this building specifically would look better with a flat roof, but Denver is in such need of something else that it seems worth it.

Overall, thumbs up.

__________________
writing | twitter | bluesky | flickr | instagram | ssp photo threads
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #119  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2005, 7:33 PM
soleri soleri is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,246
^
Good analysis. Overall, very good. Tweak the roof.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #120  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2005, 7:50 PM
mhays mhays is offline
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 21,197
bcp, I'm not seeing where the "multi-billion" term came from. But if they're talking about 1,000 housing units, even a single billion would mean a development cost of $1,000,000 per unit. Or was the term referring to a larger scope?

I like this building architecturally, sort of. The big rendering looks better than the smaller one. There might be too many things going on.

It's surprising that they have about over 1.5 parking spaces per unit. This seems excessive. How does that relate to the City's code requirements? If the City requires a lot of spaces, that's certainly part of the reason why Downtown Denver doesn't have more $220,000 units going up. Or is the developer simply choosing to build more spaces than required, and probably overestimating demand?

The units must be very large on average, given the size of the building, even accounting for the above-grade garage.
__________________
"Alot" has never been a word.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:55 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.