HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4001  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2026, 9:48 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is offline
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 30,292
Good news for MDW. The long 2 year slide in pax #'s appears to have bottomed out, at least for now.

Quote:
Midway Airport starts to claw its way back

By
John Pletz
June 19, 2026 10:35 AM CDT

Traffic at Midway International Airport has begun to pick up slightly after two years of decline.
Source: https://www.chicagobusiness.com/transpor...port-traffic-rebound-southwest-20260619/


Article goes on to mention that Frontier has significantly scaled back MDW scheduling in favor of ORD, which I wasn't aware of.

Maybe they're trying to pick up some of the slack from the Spirit implosion?
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a marvelous middle ground for many middle class families.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4002  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2026, 3:14 PM
F1 Tommy's Avatar
F1 Tommy F1 Tommy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,124
EgyptAir A350 flights started last Sunday to Cairo .


Philippine Airlines to Manila still a go starting in November 2026. I think this will be a hot new route.

Old article.


https://onemileatatime.com/news/philippine-airlines-chicago-flights/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4003  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2026, 2:42 PM
twister244 twister244 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,267
The ORD X page posted a really good aerial of the current midfield construction area - https://x.com/fly2ohare/status/2075326903859265987/photo/1



The concrete mat for the base of Concourse D is being put down. It also appears the big excavated area is the consolidated tunnel which will eventually connect the new satellites to the Global Terminal.

I still think it's possible things get switched back up again and E goes up before the Global Terminal. No way the airlines are going to want to see their flight count get slashed as a result of T2 being demolished to make way for a Global Terminal when you can just build E first then move the T2 flights over....... I posted this over in a.net, but I think the airport is hedging right now by preparing for both outcomes. Do all of the consolidated tunnel, taxiway, utility work now - Then you are ready for either the Global Terminal or E getting built next.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4004  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2026, 5:48 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by twister244 View Post
It also appears the big excavated area is the consolidated tunnel which will eventually connect the new satellites to the Global Terminal.
I thought they had ruled out an APM system, but it looks like they are building the tunnel large enough for an APM guideway in the future. Glad they aren't being foolish about this. You don't wanna rip up the airfield twice.

Quote:
No way the airlines are going to want to see their flight count get slashed as a result of T2 being demolished to make way for a Global Terminal when you can just build E first then move the T2 flights over
That depends on how quickly the D gates get filled up, and broader travel trends. If demand levels off, then the D gates could buy them enough flexibility to close T2 for a few years.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4005  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2026, 6:03 PM
twister244 twister244 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,267
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
That depends on how quickly the D gates get filled up, and broader travel trends. If demand levels off, then the D gates could buy them enough flexibility to close T2 for a few years.
Agreed, but if D were completed today, I would expect the airlines to be pushing hard to get E off the ground. You can't move all of the T2 flights into D - There aren't enough new gates, and United would probably much rather have larger widebodies in new gates that can yield more revenue than hand these new gates over to regional T2 flights....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4006  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2026, 6:06 PM
Chi-Sky21 Chi-Sky21 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,347
Man, that is a hike to that farthest terminal. E I believe. A long time to be looking at colored lights on a moving walkway......
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4007  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2026, 10:19 PM
left of center's Avatar
left of center left of center is offline
1st Ward
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Big Onion
Posts: 2,919
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chi-Sky21 View Post
Man, that is a hike to that farthest terminal. E I believe. A long time to be looking at colored lights on a moving walkway......
The ORD Next tunnel will have an APM (automated people mover train), which will ultimately connect the new concourses to the rebuilt Terminal 2, and eventually (several decades from now), a Western Terminal by the IL-390 and I-490 interchange.

ORD will start to loosely resemble ATL in a sense, with parallel concourses and runways north and south of them, which will be a much better configuration over what exists currently.


Source: https://chicagoyimby.com/2024/09/69654.html

You can see the land to the west of the new concourses will remain undeveloped, in order to accomodate future demand for new gates. The Western Terminal will initially be for airport employees, with the eventual plan to expand it for passenger service.
__________________
"Eventually, I think Chicago will be the most beautiful great city left in the world." -Frank Lloyd Wright
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4008  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2026, 12:57 AM
Chi-Sky21 Chi-Sky21 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,347
Thank you that makes a lot more sense NOW. But when they start to use that west terminal can you imagine connecting to a flight there from terminal 5? OUCH!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4009  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2026, 2:30 PM
twister244 twister244 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,267
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chi-Sky21 View Post
Thank you that makes a lot more sense NOW. But when they start to use that west terminal can you imagine connecting to a flight there from terminal 5? OUCH!
There are no plans for a "Western Terminal" right now. The plan is to buildout some employee access facilities out there.....

I don't have the image ready right now, but if anything were to go up beyond Concourse E and the Global Terminal, it's two additional satellites West of where E is going to sit. Maybe at some point down the road they could theoretically build a Western Terminal, but that will be decades from now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4010  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2026, 2:34 PM
OrdoSeclorum OrdoSeclorum is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 590
The city already published a document that includes details what the long term possibilities/plans are for ORD. https://cst.brightspotcdn.com/cc/34/ce66...ior-lien-revenue-bonds-series-2025eg.pdf

Before we get a Western Terminal, there are a number of other things that happen, probably in this order:

Satellite 1 is under construction. Then new the Global Terminal. Then Satellite 2 is built. Satellite 3 can proceed without a new airline approval vote once O’Hare has handled at least 101.5 million annual passengers for three consecutive years.

Then add Satellite 4, which would acquire airline approval.

After that it's more speculative, but a northward expansion of the currently under construction Satellite 1 is likely, adding gates there.

A complete redevelopment of Terminal 1 and the B and C gates there.

Redevelopment of Terminal 3 and concourse G.

There would be an additional parking garage and ground side Terminal 5 improvements happening in there somewhere.

Once there are three satellites and a people mover, it changes what's possible on the west side. A terminal there would *probably* not have gates. It would be access and a passenger processor plus parking and ground transportation on the west side with a connection to the new train. Of course, by whatever decade this is feasible we'll probably have AI piloting fusion powered electric aircraft, so who knows what security and flying will be like.

Anyway, with the ability to add three more satellite terminals plus the expansion of D, we're probably talking about ~70 more gates being possible. With a reconstruction of T1 and T3, we could accommodate a lot more widebodies if the satellites were handling smaller jets. Only Denver, Dallas and Washington Dulles have the full combination of land, runway geometry and development space to contemplate expansion comparable with O’Hare. Denver has preserved space for 12 (!) runways and sits on 53 square miles. It is probably the only airport whose theoretical ceiling for passenger capacity is higher than O'Hare's.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4011  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2026, 4:16 PM
twister244 twister244 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,267
Quote:
Originally Posted by OrdoSeclorum View Post
The city already published a document that includes details what the long term possibilities/plans are for ORD. https://cst.brightspotcdn.com/cc/34/ce66...ior-lien-revenue-bonds-series-2025eg.pdf

Before we get a Western Terminal, there are a number of other things that happen, probably in this order:

Satellite 1 is under construction. Then new the Global Terminal. Then Satellite 2 is built. Satellite 3 can proceed without a new airline approval vote once O’Hare has handled at least 101.5 million annual passengers for three consecutive years.

Then add Satellite 4, which would acquire airline approval.

After that it's more speculative, but a northward expansion of the currently under construction Satellite 1 is likely, adding gates there.

A complete redevelopment of Terminal 1 and the B and C gates there.

Redevelopment of Terminal 3 and concourse G.

There would be an additional parking garage and ground side Terminal 5 improvements happening in there somewhere.

Once there are three satellites and a people mover, it changes what's possible on the west side. A terminal there would *probably* not have gates. It would be access and a passenger processor plus parking and ground transportation on the west side with a connection to the new train. Of course, by whatever decade this is feasible we'll probably have AI piloting fusion powered electric aircraft, so who knows what security and flying will be like.

Anyway, with the ability to add three more satellite terminals plus the expansion of D, we're probably talking about ~70 more gates being possible. With a reconstruction of T1 and T3, we could accommodate a lot more widebodies if the satellites were handling smaller jets. Only Denver, Dallas and Washington Dulles have the full combination of land, runway geometry and development space to contemplate expansion comparable with O’Hare. Denver has preserved space for 12 (!) runways and sits on 53 square miles. It is probably the only airport whose theoretical ceiling for passenger capacity is higher than O'Hare's.
Great breakdown.

I would just add that all of this is completely subjective to macro economics and what the airlines ultimately want to do. I'm still not convinced that the Global Terminal is next on the construction list.... If Concourse D were to be complete right now - UA won't be able to move all of their flights from Terminal 2 over to Concourse D. There are 43 gates in Terminal 2, yet only 19 new gates in D when it's complete. Even then though, these gates will able to accommodate wide body aircraft. I doubt UA is going to want to sacrifice wide-body capable gates just for regional flights they have in T2....... Hence, I could easily see UA pushing hard right now to have a plan in place to pivot to Concourse E instead of the Global Terminal. On the flip side, if the economy were to go to shit before D is complete, then there might be more appetite to get the Global Terminal done first with a lower flight demand at ORD during construction.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4012  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2026, 4:23 PM
Jstange059's Avatar
Jstange059 Jstange059 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Location: Chicago
Posts: 411


+1 to Chicago’s crane count, a crane is now up at O’hare! (If you can see it through the thick wildfire smoke!)
__________________
@that-person.bsky.social
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4013  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2026, 6:25 PM
left of center's Avatar
left of center left of center is offline
1st Ward
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Big Onion
Posts: 2,919
Nice shot! Safe travels wherever you may be headed! Or, I guess maybe welcome back?
__________________
"Eventually, I think Chicago will be the most beautiful great city left in the world." -Frank Lloyd Wright
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4014  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2026, 9:42 PM
Jstange059's Avatar
Jstange059 Jstange059 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Location: Chicago
Posts: 411
Quote:
Originally Posted by left of center View Post
Nice shot! Safe travels wherever you may be headed! Or, I guess maybe welcome back?
Just returning from one of a bunch of business trips I’ve been on recently
__________________
@that-person.bsky.social
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4015  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2026, 1:01 AM
dewbs dewbs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 159
ORD new gates




Best I could get from the end of the C gates.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:01 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.