Quote:
Originally Posted by homebody
I have never heard anyone as negative as you! Honestly, you pick about every thing no mater what it is. Maybe when it’s done just don’t look up! Remember it’s still better than what was there!
|
Nothing is perfect and I don't see pointing out flaws as negativity, just reasonable points for discussion. Better that than the rah-rah "Gee isn't it great?" gushing that we sometimes see here about any development at all.
Some things are much, much further from perfect than others. This project appears to be one of those.
If you look back I have already agreed that this is better (obviously) than the derelict building that was there or the raw hole that was left after it's demolition. However, being better than a rubble filled hole or an abandoned, grafitti covered 1950's building really isn't a very high standard to meet.
This building doesn't seem like it will be awful, just kind of boring and mediocre.
I just can't help but be disappointed with what is going up in this prime location and think "A missed generational opportunity"
There seems to be a certain mindset in Saint John that thinks nothing should change in terms of our streetscapes or architectural styles or at least that everything new should blend in.......pretty boring IMO.
A city's should evolve and grow. It's architecture should reflect the era in which various buildings were designed and constructed. We don't need to be mindlessly recreating the style of 100-150 years ago by putting up stamped out imitations. Is anybody going to look at 99 King in 50 or 75 years and think "excellent example of early 21st century design?"
Don't forget, this is a major building in a prominent uptown location.....not a 4-6 story stick built Spitfire designed build on the outskirts of town. As such I think it reasonable to hold it to a much higher standard.
end of rant