| |
Posted Nov 4, 2025, 10:18 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 1,547
|
|
It's election day in Albuquerque, but unfortunately the effort to reapeal the prohibition on public spending for a performing arts center isn't on the ballot due to a supposed "clerical error" on the part of the city clerk's office. It's unknown when or if the question will appear on a ballot in the future.
https://downtownalbuquerquenews.com/
Quote:
Ballot question meant to open door to Downtown performing arts center is MIA
City clerk takes the blame, says it was clerical error.
The Office of the City Clerk said Monday that it had inadvertently left a measure meant to clear the way for a Downtown performing arts center off of election ballots, throwing a wrench into the broader effort and setting off a scramble to figure out when and how voters might ultimately decide the matter.
The clerk's office said in a statement that it took responsibility for the mistake, which it chalked up to a clerical error. "We're reviewing our procedures to prevent future errors and exploring all options to ensure voters can weigh in on this matter as soon as possible," the statement said.
City Councilor Joaquín Baca, who sponsored the legislation to put the question on the ballot, said he was "extremely disappointed" to learn of the mistake, which he discovered late last week while following up on an inquiry from DAN about the measure's status.
"I hadn't voted yet and nobody else noticed," he said Monday. "I spent a few days calming down for sure."
When and how the mistake might be rectified is an ongoing topic of conversation between City Clerk Ethan Watson, Baca, and council staff, the councilor added.
The logistics of such a do-over could prove tricky. While many analysts and not a few candidates expect the mayoral race to go to a runoff, Baca said it wasn't yet clear if the performing arts center question could be appended to that ballot, or if it might need to wait until either the primary or general election in 2026. Special elections, meanwhile, are theoretically possible but come with extra costs.
Also unclear is the extent to which Baca might need to move further legislation to make a second attempt possible. He said he would wait to make detailed plans on that front until questions about the runoff are resolved.
The ballot question would have asked voters to remove a provision in the city charter that prevents the city from spending more than $10 million on a Downtown performing arts center without a public vote. The unusual requirement traces its roots back to 1987, when the City Council signed off on a 10-year tax to fund an array of "quality of life" projects, with $64 million worth of the proceeds earmarked for a Downtown arts center to be located on the square block just north of Civic Plaza, as the Journal reported in 1999. But that move seems to have inspired something of a tax revolt: In 1991, voters passed an amendment to the city charter putting all of what were described as "large building projects" up for a vote. Most of the measure got repealed later that same year, but the requirement for a vote on arts centers remained and has been there ever since. Voters rejected a proposed center in 1993, and in 1999 also rejected an attempt to take the approval requirement out of the charter.
Baca has been a full-throated advocate for a Downtown center, arguing that it will lead to city center revitalization. Earlier this year, he also attempted to put before voters a gross receipts tax increase meant to pay for it and an array of other "quality of life" projects around the city. That proposal failed in May amid much council rancor (DAN, 5/8/25), but Baca said this week that he would try to bring it back in 2026.
|
https://www.krqe.com/news/politics-gover...rgot-to-include-a-measure-on-the-ballot/
Quote:
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (KRQE) – Albuquerque voters are facing a slightly shorter ballot this election, but not on purpose. The Albuquerque City Clerk admitted that one measure that should have been there never made the ballot. That ballot measure is meant to change restrictions on how much the city can spend on a performing arts center downtown, but after it was accidentally left off the ballot, the city is now trying to figure out when voters will have a say.
“It’s an anomaly, it’s unprecedented, super disappointing,” said Joaquín Baca, Albuquerque City Council for District 2.
Councilor Baca described a big mistake that has left a question off for voters on this November’s ballot. Voters were supposed to decide on a measure aimed at changing the Albuquerque City Charter. Right now, the Albuquerque City Council has to ask voters permission if they want to spend more than $10 million on a downtown performing arts center.
Councilor Baca hoped that voters would repeal that rule, but while councilors approved the question in March, the city clerk’s office forgot about it, until Councilor Baca called them.
“When I called, they were like, ‘wait what? Let us call you back, sort of the thing, so they were caught off guard themselves,” said Baca.
The City Clerk’s office called it a “clerical error” and said it “take responsibility” for the mistake. While Baca called it an “honest mistake,” now the city has to figure out what’s next.
“So, this is pretty unprecedented, and so nobody really knows exactly what that looks like, so we’re trying to, “A” we got all the attorneys on it trying to figure that out. And the way it’s written, it has to be on the 2025 ballot, but that could potentially be the run-off ballot,” said Councilor Baca.
Councilor Baca said another potential scenario could force city council to restart the process to put it on next year’s ballot amid the possibility of up to five new city councilors, a prospect that Councilor Baca said isn’t ideal. “There’s a lot of work and time and energy that goes into that, and so that’s…I don’t want to start over, but that’s you know, it is what it is,” said Councilor Baca.
While the city council met Monday night, they still haven’t decided the next step, but they’re hoping to have a better idea of what that could look like by the end of the week. The Clerk’s Office said it’s also “reviewing procedures to prevent future errors.”
|
This is absolutely infuriating and one of the most maddening examples of incompetence by our local leaders and people in charge. How they could simply "forget" to put the question on the ballot is beyond me. This is your biggest job and responsibility and you just simply forget to do it right and correctly??
The city clerk must resign or be fired as far as I'm concerned. There's simply no excuse and acceptable reason for this to have happened. This particular city clerk has been problematic and had questionable actions in his role before. That's even more reason to get rid of him. He's just not competent, trustworthy or good at this job, period, end of story.
|
|
|