HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2561  
Old Posted Jul 18, 2024, 3:21 PM
Ozabald Ozabald is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 477
Quote:
Originally Posted by FactaNV View Post
Right on, they built a highway or two. I'd much rather that equalization go to hospitals, growing the economy (to get off equalization) or a litany of other things which are more important than shaving seconds off a commute. Last I checked Manitoba's economy (GDP) was almost $10000 CAD per capita larger than New Brunswick and that's even when they have easily accessible seaports for easy exports. Nevermind the fact that the rampant corruption in favour of the feudal lords of the Irving Group of Companies is hardly something desirable to emulate. I suppose we're doing something right.
The highway upgrades in NB were not for "shaving seconds off a commute". They were completed to recognize that NB is a hub province for Atlantic Canada for connections to the US and Central Canada. Similar rationale the MB government is now using to justify the upgrade to the Perimeter Highway in Winnipeg.

Yes, per capita GDP in MB is higher than NB (around $6200 difference using 2022 data). Still, MB's numbers are nothing to brag about as MB's per capita GDP is $15000 less than Newfoundland's and nearly $36,000 less than neighbouring Saskatchewan. Overall, MB's per capita GDP is 8.3% lower than the Canadian average.

Your comment begs the question where does the equalization money go? Manitoba received a 24% increase in equalization for 2024-25; now receiving $4.3B annually. It seems the funds are not being invested in infrastructure in MB for sure.

And since were are on a MB vs. NB comparison; how about a comparison of crime stats?

Last edited by Ozabald; Jul 18, 2024 at 4:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2562  
Old Posted Jul 18, 2024, 3:34 PM
bodaggin bodaggin is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 248
Here's a December 2023 animal crossing in Alberta for $17.5m. There were 6 bids. The $17m bid had problems. The highest bid was $23m. So a range of $17-23m. These animal crossings are 5 times wider than a 2-lane rural overpass like Carberry or Yellowhead (50m wide vs 8m wide). So yes, even with 1-mile of access roads, these rural 2-lane overpasses can be $15-25m, every day of the week, with competent management.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2563  
Old Posted Jul 18, 2024, 4:17 PM
bodaggin bodaggin is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 248
From the Carberry open house July 15. You have to stand in awe at the squandering. We need to clean house. On no planet does this cost $100m. These bean counters have lost their minds.

https://www.brandonsun.com/local/202...y-intersection

"The province has said that an interchange or overpass could also be built but that it’s seen as a long-term solution with a 20-year-plus timeline and a cost estimate of around $100 million."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2564  
Old Posted Jul 18, 2024, 4:50 PM
optimusREIM's Avatar
optimusREIM optimusREIM is online now
There is always a way
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,923
What a breathtaking waste of 12 million dollars.
__________________
"Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm."
Federalist #10, James Madison
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2565  
Old Posted Jul 19, 2024, 9:10 PM
Winnipeg Grump's Avatar
Winnipeg Grump Winnipeg Grump is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 515
Can't track it down (also, too lazy at the end of the week!), but fairly certain that Biff had broken out the bridge costs for the St. Mary's project at ~$25 M so, if that's the case, where is the other $75 million going on the Carberry overpass?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2566  
Old Posted Jul 19, 2024, 9:33 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 14,055
Rebuilding the entire highway and buying the land to do so. Fees, contingency up the ying yang.

I don't get why tehy cant just add the bridge and ramps like the example that was posted here somewhere of the US project.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2567  
Old Posted Jul 19, 2024, 9:35 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 14,055
This one. And it's more elaborate than a simple diamond interchange that would go in at PTH 5. Just add the bridge and ramps, leave the rest alone. Adjust the access roads as required.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
This is what they're doing for $27.5 million USD.

St. mary's includes large streches of highway reconstruction and side roads. That's why these projects cost so much.

I've been saying for years (decades?) that the province can just add the bridges and ramps and it would cost a lot less. but they do full highway reconstruction and grade widening too.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2568  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2024, 12:25 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,245
It’s funny that you mention U.S.-52 & I-90.
I feel that the flyover ramp is long overdue.
The tricky part is to look at the entire roadway network in that area as a whole, though.
Whenever I wonder why the movement from I-90 East to U.S.-52 North isn’t free flowing, I just remember that the I-90 & U.S.-63 junction to the west, if upgraded, will take care of that.

Anyway, I digress.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:25 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.