The forum will be temporarily closed soon for maintenance.
    
HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5161  
Old Posted Oct 11, 2023, 10:58 PM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,023
and another

Willingdon & Halifax

Quote:
The overall proposal is for two high-rise residential towers atop a non-market residential rental and commercial/retail podium with underground parking. The development is anticipated to be constructed over two main phases, with Phase 1 encompassing the western half of the site, and Phase 2 the eastern half.

Details include:
  • a 60-storey condo tower (651 ft);
  • a 43-storey rental & office tower (479 ft);
  • 815 total units;
  • 472 condo units;
  • 266 market rental units;
  • 77 non-market units;
  • 200,000 SF of commercial space (13 floors of office);
  • a total combined density of 12.66 FAR (970,000 SF);
  • 1,794 parking spaces;
  • a new public square known as ‘Buchanan Square’.
https://vancouvermarket.ca/2023/10/1...-in-brentwood/


https://vancouvermarket.ca/2023/10/1...-in-brentwood/


https://vancouvermarket.ca/2023/10/1...-in-brentwood/


https://vancouvermarket.ca/2023/10/1...-in-brentwood/


https://vancouvermarket.ca/2023/10/1...-in-brentwood/


https://vancouvermarket.ca/2023/10/1...-in-brentwood/


https://vancouvermarket.ca/2023/10/1...-in-brentwood/


https://vancouvermarket.ca/2023/10/1...-in-brentwood/


https://vancouvermarket.ca/2023/10/1...-in-brentwood/


https://vancouvermarket.ca/2023/10/1...-in-brentwood/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5162  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2023, 3:04 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,357
Interesting that the taller tower is the one placed further to west. It is ridiculous how it absolutely dominates the existing towers next to it and I could see those towers getting demolished and replaced in the next 20 years.

Also, wasn't there another 60-floor plan for the Petro Canada lot?

I don't quite like the massing of the podiumd and hoped there would be a hotel instead of more empty office space.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5163  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2023, 7:53 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,724
Dailyhive is showing more detailed renderings:

Quote:
Two towers up to 60 storeys proposed near Brentwood SkyTrain (RENDERINGS)
https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/bren...pment-rezoning
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5164  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2023, 10:13 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 14,674
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
Interesting that the taller tower is the one placed further to west. It is ridiculous how it absolutely dominates the existing towers next to it and I could see those towers getting demolished and replaced in the next 20 years.

Also, wasn't there another 60-floor plan for the Petro Canada lot?

I don't quite like the massing of the podiumd and hoped there would be a hotel instead of more empty office space.
Seems doubtful they get replaced unless any of those buildings are rental.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5165  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2023, 11:46 PM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
Interesting that the taller tower is the one placed further to west. It is ridiculous how it absolutely dominates the existing towers next to it and I could see those towers getting demolished and replaced in the next 20 years.

Also, wasn't there another 60-floor plan for the Petro Canada lot?

I don't quite like the massing of the podiumd and hoped there would be a hotel instead of more empty office space.
Yes that’s part of a future phase. Two towers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5166  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2023, 4:33 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,357
Ugh, I shouldn't have opened the DailyHive article where a couple of idiots in the comments are talking how Lougheed needs to be shrunk to just 1+1 lanes. Some people are just completely delusional, blithering idiots.

Anyways, I didn't notice it before before, but it's actually pretty cool that the rental podium allows passing through to the other side. We don't have a lot of such urban elements in this city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5167  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2023, 7:23 AM
Spr0ckets Spr0ckets is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,866
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
Interesting that the taller tower is the one placed further to west. It is ridiculous how it absolutely dominates the existing towers next to it and I could see those towers getting demolished and replaced in the next 20 years.

Also, wasn't there another 60-floor plan for the Petro Canada lot?

I don't quite like the massing of the podiumd and hoped there would be a hotel instead of more empty office space.
It's phase 1 and 2 of a proposed 4 phase project, and phase 3 is going to have an even taller tower.
(That's the 64 storey one you're asking about)









That pocket of land they sit on is going to have quite a bit of density so it almost doesn't matter what the neighbouring towers look like now.

It's worth noting that Tower 4 (the tallest one) is actually going to be phase 3 of the project and in the next phase while Tower 3 will be the last phase to be built.
No prizes fo guessing why they're phasing and building them that way with that naming/numbering system.


From the looks of it, (and assuming it retains that height through the permit application process), it will literally tower over both Solo district and Amazing Brentwood.

Also it's interesting comparing this phase with an early preliminary rendering of the very first concept proposal:-
The massing's mostly the same, even if the details have evolved quite a bit....

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5168  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2023, 7:25 AM
Spr0ckets Spr0ckets is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,866
Quote:
Originally Posted by osirisboy View Post
Yes that’s part of a future phase. Two towers.
Two future phases.
One tower in each phase:-



It's possible they build both phases together as they are doing with these two towers which are technically Phase 1 and 2.

As always, it will depend on whatever the market conditions at the time are like, I would imagine.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5169  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2023, 8:24 AM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,023
The Phase 4 site (and small park) will probably be used to stage the surrounding towers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5170  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2023, 8:27 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,804
Since tower one is nearly 200m, guessing tower 4 will be around 220?
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/306346...h/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0...lhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5171  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2023, 4:55 PM
Spr0ckets Spr0ckets is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,866
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
Since tower one is nearly 200m, guessing tower 4 will be around 220?
It could (....and should) be taller that even.

Don't forget that Tower 4 has an office/hotel and retail podium while Tower 1 is all residential.

So those podiums floors probably add significant actual height to that 10 storey difference between the two towers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5172  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2023, 4:57 PM
seamusmcduff seamusmcduff is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 591
Surprised at the amount of Office. Would have thought that some of that density would go towards hotel space, considering that seems to be far more in demand at the moment.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5173  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2023, 6:49 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
Ugh, I shouldn't have opened the DailyHive article where a couple of idiots in the comments are talking how Lougheed needs to be shrunk to just 1+1 lanes. Some people are just completely delusional, blithering idiots.

Anyways, I didn't notice it before before, but it's actually pretty cool that the rental podium allows passing through to the other side. We don't have a lot of such urban elements in this city.
Yeah they are idiots. However, I only support the idea of 1+1 lanes on one condition:

Provide an alternative link of the highway east and west, either via a tunnel or with a flyover.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5174  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2023, 7:19 PM
Spr0ckets Spr0ckets is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,866
Quote:
Originally Posted by seamusmcduff View Post
Surprised at the amount of Office. Would have thought that some of that density would go towards hotel space, considering that seems to be far more in demand at the moment.
Which is why I said "office/hotel".

The initial concept seemed to categorize it as office space, but with the current market (and who knows how long it will remain this way) a lot of developers are converting the office components of their development proposals into hotel instead and the same could happen to this as well if the office market remains dire with high vacancy rates whenever this phase gets off the ground.

There's still a long way to go till then.
I believe they estimated this phase would take about 7 years to build out.
So depending on whether they begin phase 3 (with the tallest tower) before this one gets completely built out (like, say....within the next 4-5 years) and the market is still the same, then don't be surprised to see some or all of that office becoming hotel.
And since they haven't done a DP application for it yet, converting some of it back to residential wouldn't be out of the question either.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5175  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2023, 8:17 PM
seamusmcduff seamusmcduff is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 591
I seem to recall that burnabys density allowances essentially treat office and hotel the same, and allow for them to be switched fairly easily.

Although do office floor plate sizes suit hotels? I know thats been a challenge with office to residential conversions, and I imagine it would be somewhat similar for hotels.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5176  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2023, 10:17 PM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 7,653
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spr0ckets View Post
Which is why I said "office/hotel".

The initial concept seemed to categorize it as office space, but with the current market (and who knows how long it will remain this way) a lot of developers are converting the office components of their development proposals into hotel instead and the same could happen to this as well if the office market remains dire with high vacancy rates whenever this phase gets off the ground.
There doesn't seem to be a clear pattern on replacing office for hotel. It's less than a year that Keltic said they were thinking of changing Bosa's proposed project at 4444 Kingsway "to replace the hotel with more office and other commercial space, including a small grocery outlet and upscale restaurants."
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5177  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2023, 2:33 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 14,674
Willingdon Lands Phase 1

Quote:
The development's first phase along Willingdon Avenue and Goard Way includes a six-storey non-market rental building, a 14-storey rental and non-market rental building and a 20-storey leasehold strata building with street-oriented townhomes, according to the report.

This first phase would see a total of 622 new residential units built, made up of 267 leasehold strata units, 51 rental units rented at market median rates, 213 market rental units and 91 rental units rented at 20 per cent below the Central Park/Metrotown market median.

The report notes the leasehold tenure would allow the Nations to maintain ownership of the lands in perpetuity, and it is expected to create a more affordable alternative to freehold home ownership in Burnaby.
Quote:
The master plan imagines the site as a contemporary Musqueam and Tsleil-Waututh urban village with residential, commercial, film studio and offices over seven phases of construction.

That includes:

more than 5,200 homes
5,000 sq. ft. of cultural centre and community space
135,000 sq. ft. of commercial retail space
a daycare centre
about 450,000 sq. ft. of film studio space
two large parks with a network of trails, gardens, plazas and a daylit creek






https://www.westerninvestor.com/brit...-phase-7677736
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5178  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2023, 11:13 PM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,023
Burnaby’s Revs bowling alley could be home to trio of highrise towers up to 60 storeys tall
https://www.burnabynow.com/local-new...s-tall-7691420

Quote:
The proposed form of development will
be three high-rise towers with at-grade retail, containing the following proposed uses:
• Tower 1 (northwest tower on Lougheed):
o Market condo
o Affordable rental
• Tower 2 (east tower, mid-site):
0 Market condo
• Tower 3 (southwest tower on Goring):
o Market condo
• Retail (north along Lougheed):
o Ground-level CRU's
Tower 1 hosts a combination of market condo and affordable rental units and reaches a height
of approximately 60 storeys. Tower 2 hosts strictly market condo units and reaches a height of
approximately 55 storeys. Tower 3 also strictly hosts market condo and reaches a height of
approximately 50 storeys. The three towers are connected at L2-L3 by a large indoor/outdoor
amenity space. Ground-level retail space spans approximately three quarters of the north
property line along Lougheed.
https://pub-burnaby.escribemeetings....edium=referral
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5179  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2023, 11:18 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 14,674
Another Chris Dikeakos Architects project.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5180  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2023, 6:03 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,357
Brentwood is turning quickly into a Hong Kong style vertical ghetto. While I like tall buildings, making 60 storeys the new norm is pretty ridiculous, especially with the tight tower spacing. Not a fan of it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:47 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.