HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & Urban Ottawa


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2016, 11:13 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,428
NRCan Booth Street Complex Redevelopment | Approved

Redevelopment process set to begin on former NRCan Booth Street property

Don Butler, Ottawa Citizen
Published on: June 15, 2016 | Last Updated: June 15, 2016 6:57 PM EDT




After years of planning that seemingly went nowhere, efforts to redevelop part of Natural Resources Canada‘s 10-hectare Booth Street complex should be under way within months.

Canada Lands Company, a Crown corporation that manages, redevelops or sells surplus federal properties, acquired a 2.6-hectare chunk of the Booth Street campus from NRCan last October.

The property, bounded by Booth, Orangeville, Norman and Rochester streets, was part of the NRCan complex, where about 3,000 departmental personnel work.

However, the property was declared surplus to NRCan’s needs in 2011 and the seven buildings on the site, some dating back to the 1930s, were vacant at the time of the transfer.

Canada Landsspokeswoman Manon Lapensée said Wednesday the Crown corporation is completing its analysis of the site and will “shortly” begin a public consultation process, similar to the one it conducted after acquiring the former CFB Rockcliffe.

Canada Lands held 195 meetings with residents, community organizations and neighbouring institutions to help smooth the way for Rockcliffe airbase project. Last year, city council approved a 20-year development plan for the property, which will eventually be home to 10,000 people.

Though some have suggested the Booth Street property could become Ottawa’s version of Toronto’s popular Distillery District, Lapensée said Canada Lands has not developed a proposal yet. “We want to hear what people have to say, and their thoughts and aspirations for the site.”

Canada Lands will also work closely with the City of Ottawa, which must approve any eventual plan.

Several of the buildings on the property are registered federal heritage buildings, complicating any potential plan to demolish them. (Or maybe not — the Sir John Carling Building on the Experimental Farm, which carried the same heritage designation, was demolished in 2014.)

Lapensée said Canada Lands will develop a heritage strategy for the property in consultation with the city. According to its website, the heritage strategy “will commemorate and celebrate the history of the site, while seeking to reserve and reintegrate some buildings, facades and/or elements where possible.

“The company believes that any new buildings and landscaping should reinforce the heritage character and assist in the historical interpretation of the site.”

There are also indications that more sections of the Booth Street complex could be made available for redevelopment.

A tender notice published earlier this month, dealing with the rehousing of NRCan’s National Geological Reference Collection at the Canadian Museum of Nature, stated that the Booth Street facilities “have been identified as obsolete and will soon be declared surplus.”

When questioned about that by the Citizen, however, departmental spokeswoman Angela Kokkinos said in an email no decision has been taken to declare the Booth Street facilities surplus. NRCan then revised the tender notice to delete the “surplus” reference.

“No decision has yet been made to sell the buildings that the department currently occupies,” Kokkinos added.

Plans to redevelop the Booth Street complex date back more than a decade.

Documents obtained by the Citizen in 2005 showed the government was planning to sell five buildings in the complex for redevelopment, including two buildings — 601 and 615 Booth Street — outside the property acquired by Canada Lands.

A detailed plan prepared by NRCan and Canada Lands in 2008 proposed a new “headquarters showcase” tower, the demolition of 615 Booth, construction of low-rise residential buildings around a central court and two new residential highrises.

In 2011, the Citizen reported that much of the Booth Street complex was in terrible condition and could soon be abandoned. According to internal documents, both 601 and 615 Booth were in “critical condition and require replacement.”

As well, a 2012 audit of real property mentioned plans to dispose of nine buildings in the Booth Street complex.

Earlier this year, some residents floated the idea of locating The Ottawa Hospital’s new Civic campus at the Booth Street site, though it is significantly smaller than the minimum 20 hectares the hospital says it requires.

[email protected]

twitter.com/ButlerDon
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2016, 11:24 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,428
Canada Lands Company: Booth Street Complex
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2016, 3:43 AM
kevinbottawa kevinbottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,250
I've been asking around about this redevelopment for a while now. Glad they're finally taking some steps forward. Even though, the Canada Lands Company seems to generally do a good job with their developments I fear that they won't get this one right. We'll see. Either way Booth will be anchored at both ends by industrial/heritage redevelopments with this and Zibi.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2016, 7:35 PM
little italian little italian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 27
Any idea what this means realistically in terms of when shovels will be in the ground?

They make the comparison with rockcliffe aribase. I gather this took 3-4 years of consultations post transfer just to settle on a development plan. Should we expect the same? Or is the fact that this is a smaller parcel of land speed things up?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2016, 7:52 PM
OTSkyline OTSkyline is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,810
Looking at that Google Map aerial view - it's so obvious that it would work so well as a "distillery district". The old brick buildings, the great location, that brick tower... Just convert the buildings to offices and hipster lofts, renovate some of those surface parking lots with cobblestone plazas and park-ettes, add a couple of glass condo towers around or attached to some of those existing lowrise brick buildings (turning the brick building as a podium), maybe a nice Loblaws, couple of shops, pubs, restaurants and maybe actual distilleries this could be a great area.

Especially with more towers and people moving to the Little Italy area, this could be a great addition to the neighborhood.

But alas, probably nothing for another 5-10 years. And when it does happen, it'll be half-assed
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2016, 1:31 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by little italian View Post
Any idea what this means realistically in terms of when shovels will be in the ground?

They make the comparison with rockcliffe aribase. I gather this took 3-4 years of consultations post transfer just to settle on a development plan. Should we expect the same? Or is the fact that this is a smaller parcel of land speed things up?
Depends how long the consultations with the Algonquins is going to drag it out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2017, 12:39 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,428
Grocery store, affordable housing among ideas for Booth Street

By: Adam Kveton, Metro
Published on Thu Jan 26 2017



This aerial photo shows the Booth Street site which the Canada Lands Company plans to redevelop.
The buildings in blue are designated heritage buildings by the federal government. The company held
its first public meeting on the redevelopment Tuesday.


Residents had their first chance Tuesday to put forward ideas for the redevelopment of a former government metallurgy lab site near Dow’s Lake.

The Canada Lands Company, an arms-length crown corporation that redevelops unneeded federal government land, held their first public consultation on Tuesday for the site, located on the west side of Booth Street between Norman and Orangeville streets.

The company’s purpose is to redevelop and re-integrate land into its surrounding neighbourhood while generating enough money to fund itself, said Jean Lachance, senior director of real estate in Ottawa for the company.

Some attendees of the public meeting expressed interest in seeing a grocery store at the site, affordable housing, open space, and the preservation of some of the federally-designated heritage buildings on the site, said Lachance.

Five of the seven buildings on the site were given heritage designation, however the future of those buildings is in the hands of the city and its own heritage designation process.

The buildings, part of a physical metallurgy lab, were a result of the need for new sources of energy, strategic minerals and gold during the Second World War, says the Canadian Register of historic places.

Next up for the redevelopment effort is the creation of an advisory working group made up of members from the community, said Lachance. The plan is to have two more public meetings before making a submission to the city in the late fall or early 2018.

http://www.metronews.ca/news/ottawa/2017...-on-former-booth-street-ottawa-lab-.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2017, 5:13 AM
MarkR MarkR is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 148
Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketphish View Post
Grocery store, affordable housing among ideas for Booth Street

By: Adam Kveton, Metro
Published on Thu Jan 26 2017



This aerial photo shows the Booth Street site which the Canada Lands Company plans to redevelop.
The buildings in blue are designated heritage buildings by the federal government. The company held
its first public meeting on the redevelopment Tuesday.


(snip)

The buildings, part of a physical metallurgy lab, were a result of the need for new sources of energy, strategic minerals and gold during the Second World War, says the Canadian Register of historic places.

(snip)

http://www.metronews.ca/news/ottawa/2017...-on-former-booth-street-ottawa-lab-.html
My Dad was one of the chief metallurgists there after the war until '52. The family (way before I was born) lived on Elm St. near Preston, and Dad walked to work. When I asked him about the place years ago he said if the rolling mill was still there he was the one that oversaw its installation, among other things. Funnily enough, one of my best pals had both a father and grandfather as metallurgists, and both worked in that same building, though his grandfather was before my dad and his dad was after.

I look forward to seeing how this area develops...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2017, 2:16 PM
citydwlr citydwlr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 733
Canada Lands Company has a link to the slide-deck used at the consultation, as well as a survey on their site. While the first few questions on the survey target those in attendance at the workshop, the last question is open for feedback.

Booth Street Overview (CLC Website): http://en.clc.ca/property/522
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2017, 7:41 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by citydwlr View Post
Canada Lands Company has a link to the slide-deck used at the consultation, as well as a survey on their site. While the first few questions on the survey target those in attendance at the workshop, the last question is open for feedback.

Booth Street Overview (CLC Website): http://en.clc.ca/property/522
Here too:

http://www.rueboothstreet.ca
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted May 19, 2017, 1:47 AM
citydwlr citydwlr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 733
Email update on the Booth Street project:

Quote:
Canada Lands Company is pleased to invite you to an open house regarding its Booth Street property.

The open house will include a short presentation of the preliminary concepts for the Booth Street property, followed by an informal opportunity to engage with Canada Lands Company staff.

The presentation will be shown twice, once at 5:30pm and again at 7:00pm. Light refreshments will be served. Thank you.

RSVP: info[at]rueboothstreet.ca

Date: May 31, 2017
Time: Doors open: 5:00pm / Presentations:
5:30pm and again at 7:00pm
Location: St. Anthony's Banquet Hall (523 St Anthony Street, Ottawa)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2017, 4:09 PM
citydwlr citydwlr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 733
Wasn't able to attend the consultation last night, and haven't been able to locate any information about it, apart from this photo (via Twitter):



Did anyone attend? Were there other boards available?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2017, 5:32 PM
kevinbottawa kevinbottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,250
Quote:
Originally Posted by citydwlr View Post
Wasn't able to attend the consultation last night, and haven't been able to locate any information about it, apart from this photo (via Twitter):



Did anyone attend? Were there other boards available?
Here are the boards from last night. One of the boards, that I didn't take a picture of, made mention of a grocery store. One of the presenters also mentioned that people are divided on whether or not they should keep the smoke stack. A lot of people want it kept, including me, but there are other people saying the smoke stack has to go. All options have the smoke stack in tact.

Option 1 keeps the least amount of heritage buildings. Option 2 keeps the most heritage buildings. Option is a mix of the two. There is also a difference in where the green space is located. Personally, I think there's too much.


Option 1


Option 2




Option 3



Last edited by kevinbottawa; Jun 1, 2017 at 5:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2017, 5:43 PM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,965
Why do public bodies in this city have such a problem making these consultation materials available proactively?
__________________
___
Enjoy my taxes, Orleans (and Kanata?).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2017, 5:47 PM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 26,072
This is trivial, but it has bothered me since post #10 that the smokestack was not part of the heritage side of the project. I see from the concept panels that the stack is still there, which is a very good thing, imo.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2017, 11:18 PM
citydwlr citydwlr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 733
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwoldtimer View Post
This is trivial, but it has bothered me since post #10 that the smokestack was not part of the heritage side of the project. I see from the concept panels that the stack is still there, which is a very good thing, imo.
Same here! When I filled out the survey, I suggested a few times that they keep it.

@kevinbottawa, thanks for posting those photos!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2017, 12:04 PM
kevinbottawa kevinbottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,250
Quote:
Originally Posted by citydwlr View Post
Same here! When I filled out the survey, I suggested a few times that they keep it.

@kevinbottawa, thanks for posting those photos!
No problem!

They had a board showing the interiors of the heritage buildings but I didn't even think to take a picture of it. I'm really impressed with how the insides of these buildings look. I thought they'd be more institutional but they're actually industrial looking.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2017, 11:09 AM
eltodesukane eltodesukane is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,141

Last edited by eltodesukane; Jun 2, 2017 at 11:34 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2017, 6:20 PM
DubberDom DubberDom is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 201
Quote:
Originally Posted by eltodesukane View Post
Unrelated observation .... why is the Queensway also referred to as the King's Highway on the map above??

I can think of some reasons... but probably not proper to be posted here
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2017, 7:01 PM
acottawa acottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 18,792
Quote:
Originally Posted by DubberDom View Post
Unrelated observation .... why is the Queensway also referred to as the King's Highway on the map above??

I can think of some reasons... but probably not proper to be posted here
Most provincial highways in Ontario (the ones with the crown on the sign) are King's Highways.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & Urban Ottawa
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:37 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.