HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Suburbs


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2014, 7:58 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,880
19 - 23 Bachman Terrace | ? m | 3 fl | Approved

Tega Developments is proposing to construct a total of 25 three storey townhouse units. One building that abuts Bachman Terrace contains 20 back-to-back townhouse units. The proposed building will have a flat roof to diminish its height. Ten of the units will have direct driveway access onto Bachman Terrace and will have sufficient space for one car to be stored in the garage and one in the driveway so as to diminish onstreet parking. Driveways are twinned so that there is also space for on-street parking between the driveways. The ten back-to-back townhouse units located to the interior of the site have access to Bachman Terrace by a common driveway that they also share with the five townhouse units in the second building. The second building is located at the rear of 19 Bachman Terrace.

Development application:
http://app01.ottawa.ca/postingplans/...appId=__968DGI

Tega Homes:
http://www.katseponteslaw.com/Bachman_Home.html

Rendering:
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2014, 7:58 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,880
Twenty-five townhouses proposed for Bachman Terrace

Kanata Kourier-Standard
By Adam Kveton, May 29, 2014


The city is looking for comments on a zoning amendment and proposal to build 25 townhouses on Bachman Terrace in Katimavik. The proposal outlines a plan for 20 stacked, three-storey townhouses to be built on 23 Bachman Ter. with frontage along the road, and five more three-storey townhouses on the rear portion of 19 Bachman Ter.

Katimavik-Hazelde an Community Association president Rod MacLean said the proposal comes with a number of questions: Can in-ground infrastructure such as plumbing and sewer accommodate the extra volume of use? What will this do to on-street parking on the already narrow road, how much more noise might the development create and how attractive will the townhouses be? The proposal comes from Tega Developments, which has several other townhouse developments in the city, including one at 1440 Kanata Ave.

The company's reports outline how they will deal with in-ground infrastructure and calls for 50 parking spots for the development. However, the reports do not address how the proposed townhouses might increase ambient noise in the neighbourhood.

The Bachman Terrace site is currently zoned as residential first use, which does not allow for townhouses. Tega Developments is asking for a rezoning to residential third use, and has applied to have the back portion of 19 Bachman conveyed to the abutting 23 Bachman parcel of land.

If built, the 10 townhouses that face Bachman Terrace would have direct access to the road via driveways, while the townhouses facing the interior of the property would have access through a private driveway.

Tega's planning rationale report calls the project "a compact urban development that makes efficient use of services and logically connects to an existing street." For more information on the proposal, readers can go to the Ottawa development application search engine at www.Ottawa.ca/devapps and type in development number D02-02-14-0041.

Anyone interested in making comments on the proposal or rezoning application can contact city planner Tracey Scaramozzino at 613-580-2424 ext. 12545 or at tracey.scaramozzino@ottawa.ca before June 4.

http://www.ottawacommunitynews.com/n...chman-terrace/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2014, 7:59 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,880
Planning committee rejects Kanata townhouse proposal

Matthew Pearson, Ottawa Citizen
Published on: August 21, 2014, Last Updated: August 21, 2014 3:23 PM EDT


The planning committee has ignored staff advice and voted to reject a townhouse development proposed for Kanata South.

City planners supported the Tega Homes plan to build 18 back-to-back units in two buildings and five additional street townhouses at 19 and 23 Bachman Terrace. The original application requested one large block with 20 back-to-back townhouses, as well as the five street townhouses.

The developer was seeking a zoning bylaw change, as well as rear and side yard setback exceptions.

Planners said the proposal met the requirements of the city’s official plan, but that didn’t satisfy some neighbours and councillors.

They were worried about increased density on the site, insufficient parking for residents and visitors, and concerns over snow storage and garbage.

A petition against the proposal was signed by nearly 100 people, while 14 of the 17 responses received during the city’s consultation period were opposed to the development.

“It just doesn’t make sense to do this to a street,” said Kanata South Coun. Allan Hubley, who voted against the staff recommendation.

Only planning committee chair Peter Hume supported the staff recommendation, and said the matter was bound to end up before the Ontario Municipal Board.

If it does, the city will have to hire an outside planner who agrees with and can rationalize the committee’s decision based on planning principles, Hume said, adding evidence that will go before the board — including the staff favourable opinion, won’t help the city’s case.

“If I were a betting man, I would be going to the board before modifying my proposal,” Hume said.

http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-...house-proposal
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2014, 2:59 AM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
Close to transit and across the street from shopping; townhomes just east and lowrise apartments just to the west. Seems an ideal spot for a bit higher density. Election year jitters?
http://goo.gl/maps/babiI
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2014, 3:31 AM
1overcosc's Avatar
1overcosc 1overcosc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 11,818
It meets the city's OP.... the OMB is going to take the City to town over this....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2014, 3:49 AM
Proof Sheet Proof Sheet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,914
Quote:
Originally Posted by waterloowarrior View Post
Close to transit and across the street from shopping; townhomes just east and lowrise apartments just to the west. Seems an ideal spot for a bit higher density. Election year jitters?
http://goo.gl/maps/babiI
Exactly my thoughts. I'm surprised the only vote that was in favour was from Hume who said some rather non-professional things about the builder near the beginning of the proponents presentation.

It may have been a better idea to put off the application until the new Council is elected and then the local councillor would have had almost 4 years before he had to run again. He is usually quite pro development.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Aug 27, 2014, 3:46 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
@mpearson78
. @chernushenko says urban councillors have seen many excessively-dense applications 'sail through' planning approval. #ottnews #ottpoli

@mpearson78
. @CouncilHolmes says she has 'no sympathy' for suburban councillors facing intensification issue she's faced for years. #ottnews #ottpoli

@mpearson78
#ottawa council votes to reject #Kanata application against staff advice to approve it. Only Hume, Holmes voted against. #ottnews #ottpoli
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Aug 27, 2014, 6:24 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
here is the debate, thanks to OttWatch
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjOF...u.be&t=1h5m58s
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Aug 27, 2014, 7:13 PM
Proof Sheet Proof Sheet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,914
Quote:
Originally Posted by waterloowarrior View Post
here is the debate, thanks to OttWatch
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjOF...u.be&t=1h5m58s
If this goes to the OMB, I'm pretty sure that the Council position will get overturned. Council hired experts don't often do well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2014, 1:33 AM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2014, 1:17 PM
McC's Avatar
McC McC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,057
a whole page of posts and still not a single "Bachman Terrace Overdrive" joke, yet? y'all are all dead to me.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2014, 5:10 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,880
Quote:
Originally Posted by McC View Post
a whole page of posts and still not a single "Bachman Terrace Overdrive" joke, yet? y'all are all dead to me.
Good one
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Aug 27, 2015, 9:19 PM
Proof Sheet Proof Sheet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,914
Quote:
Originally Posted by waterloowarrior View Post
Approved.

http://www.omb.gov.on.ca/e-decisions...ug-21-2015.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2015, 4:27 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
Quote:
Originally Posted by Proof Sheet View Post
Thanks for posting... all solved 1 year later
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2015, 8:31 PM
Proof Sheet Proof Sheet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,914
Quote:
Originally Posted by waterloowarrior View Post
Thanks for posting... all solved 1 year later
And at what cost by the citizens of Ottawa..a study should really be done what the costs are on these applications recommended for approval by the Planning Department that require outside consultants and City Legal Department time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Suburbs
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:18 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.