HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley


    Two Gilmore Place in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Burnaby Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted May 25, 2016, 4:39 AM
GilmoreStation GilmoreStation is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 465
[Burnaby] Concord Brentwood | U/C and Proposed

Burnaby's Yaletown in the making...









Video Link

Source: www.concordbrentwood.com
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted May 25, 2016, 4:52 AM
Alex Mackinnon's Avatar
Alex Mackinnon Alex Mackinnon is offline
Can I has a tunnel?
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,114
Dear god, someone find Concord an architect. That's appallingly boring.

Also, Lougheed Parkway? Come on...
__________________
"It's ok, I'm an engineer!" -Famous last words
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted May 25, 2016, 6:36 AM
retro_orange retro_orange is offline
retro_orange
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Mackinnon View Post
Dear god, someone find Concord an architect. That's appallingly boring.

Also, Lougheed Parkway? Come on...
Why do they keep referencing Yaletown for these suburban developments. Yaletown was built around a historical industrial neighborhood that is the driving force of it's popularity. There's not a single aspect of these developments that maintains any sort of historical context to the areas past.

The Yaletown BIA should copyright the name so they can get royalties from all these other developments that overuse the concept of 'Yaletown living'. Seriously.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted May 25, 2016, 2:50 PM
spiritofevil99 spiritofevil99 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 40
Well Concord was the developer that BUILT Yaletown so they can lay claim to it I guess.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted May 25, 2016, 3:05 PM
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 22,422
Quote:
Originally Posted by retro_orange View Post
Why do they keep referencing Yaletown for these suburban developments. Yaletown was built around a historical industrial neighborhood that is the driving force of it's popularity. There's not a single aspect of these developments that maintains any sort of historical context to the areas past.
Not to mention False Creek, a natural part of the area that is very important to its popularity.

I'm not sure what is more annoying though. Either it's "The Yaletown of Burnaby", or they make up some fake name for a community out of thin air that tries to sound cool. Langley seems to suffer from the latter issue.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted May 25, 2016, 3:08 PM
GeeCee's Avatar
GeeCee GeeCee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Port Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 2,816
That site plan is pretty funny. Here's my version of it:



It's not quite to scale but close enough. Presumably the warehouses and etc until the southern treeline would become the 'district park'.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted May 25, 2016, 3:30 PM
mgbcca mgbcca is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 52
Yikes gonna be a busy area, all this plus I believe at least 5 more towers across the street to the west planned (so far).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted May 25, 2016, 3:41 PM
EddieVH EddieVH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 84
Floorplans:

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted May 25, 2016, 3:46 PM
EddieVH EddieVH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 84





Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted May 25, 2016, 9:05 PM
Jebby's Avatar
Jebby Jebby is offline
........
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 3,321
Quote:
Originally Posted by GilmoreStation View Post

Not looking good. It seems they're going for towers in a park concept instead of urban streetwall. Very disappointing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted May 25, 2016, 9:08 PM
Jebby's Avatar
Jebby Jebby is offline
........
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 3,321
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddieVH View Post

The location of the bathroom in this floorplan really sucks. You have to go through the living and dining areas and past the kitchen to the to the shower from your bedroom and vice versa.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted May 25, 2016, 9:24 PM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,962
Burnaby's got the wrap around balcony down pat!

Strange how there are none (among new towers) in Vancouver.

The Lougheed-fronting tower on stilts were described in this article:

http://www.straight.com/news/658336/...coming-burnaby


Quote:
Originally Posted by Jebby View Post
The location of the bathroom in this floorplan really sucks. You have to go through the living and dining areas and past the kitchen to the to the shower from your bedroom and vice versa.
There's also practically no storage space.


Quote:
Originally Posted by spiritofevil99 View Post
Well Concord was the developer that BUILT Yaletown so they can lay claim to it I guess.
No they didn't.

"Yaletown" is the historic warehouse district (with historic zoning) bounded by Homer, Nelson, Drake and the alley west of Pacific Blvd.

The Concord lands (former Expo site) are NOT Yaletown.
Downtown South is also not Yaletown (though real estate agents used to call it "New Yaletown".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted May 25, 2016, 9:41 PM
spiritofevil99 spiritofevil99 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 40
I didn't meant the historical nature of Yaletown but what Yaletown is today. Yuppie condo neighborhood including David Lam Park, Roundhouse Community Centre etc. I think people consider the corridor along Pacific Blvd. Yaletown these days along with those warehouses where Blue Water Cafe is located.

Anyways, I don't care that much so yeah whatever.



Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
There's also practically no storage space.




No they didn't.

"Yaletown" is the historic warehouse district (with historic zoning) bounded by Homer, Nelson, Drake and the alley west of Pacific Blvd.

The Concord lands (former Expo site) are NOT Yaletown.
Downtown South is also not Yaletown (though real estate agents used to call it "New Yaletown".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted May 25, 2016, 10:12 PM
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 22,422
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jebby View Post
The location of the bathroom in this floorplan really sucks. You have to go through the living and dining areas and past the kitchen to the to the shower from your bedroom and vice versa.
Highlighting the giant balconies in the overall floor space is pretty cheezy too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted May 25, 2016, 10:15 PM
Large Cat's Avatar
Large Cat Large Cat is offline
Vancouver Bus Driver
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 396
This development looks a little too "towers in the park"ish for me, similar to the initial proposals for NE False Creek after the viaducts. If they really want to make Brentwood into a downtown type area, there shouldn't be this much open space between buildings. There don't need to be two massive parks in such close proximity creating big walking distances between retail, residential, etc.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted May 25, 2016, 10:28 PM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,962
Dawson is supposed to the the retail High Street - so that's the street that should have retail.
Based on the aerial pic, there look to already be some "lowrises in the park" immediately west of the Concord site on Dawson.

Lougheed can't rally be tamed and the project with the massive retaining wall on the north side of Lougheed has already set the tone (landscaping!) for the area.

I tend to think that the "commercial core" of Brentwood will be west of Alpha Ave
- i.e. Brentwood Town Centre (mall) to Gilmore Station

It's a Regional Town Centre, which probably isn't intended to be as dense as a "downtown".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted May 25, 2016, 10:30 PM
Jebby's Avatar
Jebby Jebby is offline
........
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 3,321
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
Highlighting the giant balconies in the overall floor space is pretty cheezy too.
That seems to be the new normal in developments these days. Since the units are pathetically small, they increase the perceived floor space by including the balcony area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted May 25, 2016, 11:59 PM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,228
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Burnaby's got the wrap around balcony down pat! Strange how there are none (among new towers) in Vancouver.
You have recently been commenting this to few of my questions, but perhaps LEED requirements are also the reason there? I recall there having been a thread about how much heat balconies emitted (or absorbed, can't remember)... Just a guess.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jebby View Post
Not looking good. It seems they're going for towers in a park concept instead of urban streetwall. Very disappointing.
Yeah, they should build podiums and townhouses everywhere between towers. Then there would also be more credibility to claims around Yaletown, as Yaletown is characterized by those.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted May 26, 2016, 12:04 AM
scryer scryer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,949
I agree with the "towers in a park" look mentioned before.

I also don't see how this development will interact with the street as successfully as the rest of the developments in Metro Vancouver does.

Generally I like the glass tower-look that Metro Vancouver goes for BUT these kind of look like glass commie-blocks. They wasted this opportunity and they could have been more creative as Burnaby does deserve an ICONIC tower.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted May 26, 2016, 12:07 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,228
I doubt those are final looks, at least for all of the towers. Remember that the build-out time for this is 10+ years and trends change. Some of the towers will end up similar, others now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:05 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.