Quote:
Originally Posted by DCReid
Unless we know the base figures, I don't think this list is telling us as much as people are surmising, especially for the smaller cities. I surmise NY and DC's figures are impressive because those cities are large and attract a lot of grads in any year. But for places like Portland, Tampa and Orlando, who knows? For example, maybe each city attracts 1,000 new grads, and this year they are each attracting 10% more or 1,100. But maybe Chicago, SF, and LA attract 10,000 grads last year and in 2024 they attracted 9,500 each or 5% less. Those cities are still doing more attractive than smaller cities in raw numbers, although the decrease is a worrying sign, especially since competitor cities of NYC and DC improved upon their totals.
|
If certain big cities can really focus on that housing issue and aid to drive COL down, you'd see those numbers increase even higher.
Chicago, LA, SF, NYC, DC... all are poppin' cities. People want to be there. Cost of living only serves to mitigate true LONG term potential and in some cases, negative city dynamics. The class of 2024 in a "dream" scenario doesn't want to be in the smaller and stale/boring regions, they want to be where the action is at. The superior economic nodes where the reward factor is there.
To think long term is to think about ways to make the buck go further for the common residents and continuous improvement for the top 10 cities.
I see a list in the first post and think, that should way higher for certain cities.