HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2013, 7:12 AM
N90 N90 is offline
Voice of the Modern World
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,099
How continuously built up is the Golden Horseshoe region?

I recently was in an argument with someone else on another forum who implied the continuously built up population of the Golden Horseshoe was only 6.5 million to 7 million max.

I did the work and removed detached areas like Barrie, Waterloo, and Guelph and got an all around population of 8 million - 8.2 million.

What's the population of this region when only factoring in built area? As in continuous urbanization without any breaks or detachment.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2013, 2:46 PM
MonkeyRonin's Avatar
MonkeyRonin MonkeyRonin is offline
¥ ¥ ¥
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 10,140
The continuously built up area has 6,139,000 people in 2,286 sqkm.

The total Golden Horseshoe including its separate urban areas and rural areas has 8,759,312 people in 31,561 sqkm.
__________________
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2013, 2:59 PM
hudkina hudkina is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,445
Really all you need to do is add together the Toronto, Oshawa, and Hamilton urban populations to find the continuous built up area. All the other urban areas are non-contiguous.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2013, 6:51 PM
softee's Avatar
softee softee is offline
Aimless Wanderer
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Downtown Toronto
Posts: 3,404
Yep, although the 6,139,000 figure is two years old now, it's probably more like 6.3-6.4 million now. If you include the entire CMA's of Toronto, Hamilton and Oshawa and not just the urbanized portions, then you would end up with a higher number. If the Niagara Region was included it would bump it up further, but there is a break in development between Hamilton and Niagara.
__________________
Public transit is the lifeblood of every healthy city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2013, 12:47 AM
dc_denizen's Avatar
dc_denizen dc_denizen is offline
Selfie-stick vendor
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New York Suburbs
Posts: 10,999
If we are talking, "continuously built up", shouldn't the urban area be most appropriate?

The Toronto urban area/population centre is 700 square miles, with 5.1 mm people. The boundaries are defined at less than 400 ppl/square kilometer, if I remember correctly. This cut-off is pretty rural, or the most exurban possible.

Any definition of "continuously built up" that leaps across regions with less than 400 ppl/sq km is not very credible.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2013, 12:59 AM
Nouvellecosse's Avatar
Nouvellecosse Nouvellecosse is offline
Volatile Pacivist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 9,597
But remember, Toronto's urban area would not include the urban areas of other CMAs like Hamilton or Oshawa. That doesn't mean they aren't continuously built up urban areas. So in a region that contains multiple adjacent urban areas, just going by the urban area of the largest one wouldn't be accurate.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2013, 1:02 AM
Doady's Avatar
Doady Doady is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,889
The Hamilton, Toronto, Oshawa urban areas combined definitely have more than 6 million people.

See for yourself:
http://www12.statcan.ca/census-recen...&SR=1&S=11&O=A
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2013, 1:10 AM
MonkeyRonin's Avatar
MonkeyRonin MonkeyRonin is offline
¥ ¥ ¥
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 10,140
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_denizen View Post
If we are talking, "continuously built up", shouldn't the urban area be most appropriate?

The Toronto urban area/population centre is 700 square miles, with 5.1 mm people. The boundaries are defined at less than 400 ppl/square kilometer, if I remember correctly. This cut-off is pretty rural, or the most exurban possible.

Any definition of "continuously built up" that leaps across regions with less than 400 ppl/sq km is not very credible.

Urban areas (or rather, "population centers" now) as defined by Statistics Canada cannot spread outside of CMA boundaries (which are defined by municipal commuting patterns rather than built area). So this for example, would be considered two separate urban urban areas because these are two parts of two separate CMAs - despite clearly being continuously built-up:

__________________
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2013, 2:20 AM
Doady's Avatar
Doady Doady is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,889
Everything in that pic is in Toronto CMA.

Burlington/Oakville boundary is along Burloak Rd (Burl + Oak, get it?)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2013, 2:23 AM
softee's Avatar
softee softee is offline
Aimless Wanderer
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Downtown Toronto
Posts: 3,404
^ In any case, Burlington and Oakville are contiguous despite being in separate CMA's and separate "urban areas".
__________________
Public transit is the lifeblood of every healthy city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2013, 2:47 AM
tablemtn tablemtn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 873
I'd say that "Toronto" extends from Courtice Road (east of Oshawa on exit 425 of the 401) to the Fruitland exit on the QEW in Hamilton. So, about 140km and 6.7 million people from tip to tail.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2013, 2:48 AM
Dr Nevergold Dr Nevergold is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 20,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by N90 View Post
I recently was in an argument with someone else on another forum who implied the continuously built up population of the Golden Horseshoe was only 6.5 million to 7 million max.

I did the work and removed detached areas like Barrie, Waterloo, and Guelph and got an all around population of 8 million - 8.2 million.

What's the population of this region when only factoring in built area? As in continuous urbanization without any breaks or detachment.
Its hard to compare cities since so many nations define things differently. Berlin seems smaller than it is on paper for example, not sure what kind of standards they use in Germany.

If we're talking about just the immediate contiguous urban area, I'd say Toronto has around 7 million people. If we're talking about a consolidated metropolitan area, Toronto has around the 8.5 million mark due to the addition of regional cities that are part of the Toronto market but not included in the metro area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2013, 5:58 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is offline
The Vomit Bag.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 46,383
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonkeyRonin View Post
Urban areas (or rather, "population centers" now) as defined by Statistics Canada cannot spread outside of CMA boundaries (which are defined by municipal commuting patterns rather than built area). So this for example, would be considered two separate urban urban areas because these are two parts of two separate CMAs - despite clearly being continuously built-up:

that's bronte village. All Oakville.
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. (Bertrand Russell)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2013, 7:48 PM
isaidso isaidso is offline
The New Republic
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: United Provinces of America
Posts: 10,881
Adding the CMAs of Oshawa, Toronto, and Hamilton gets you a very accurate number:

Oshawa: 375,600
Toronto: 5,941,500
Hamilton: 756,600

Continuously Built Up Area: 7,073,700

http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tabl...emo05a-eng.htm
__________________
World's First Documented Baseball Game: Beachville, Ontario, June 4th, 1838.
World's First Documented Gridiron Game: University College, Toronto, November 9th, 1861.
Hamilton Tiger-Cats since 1869 & Toronto Argonauts since 1873: North America's 2 oldest pro football teams
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2013, 8:16 PM
easy as pie's Avatar
easy as pie easy as pie is offline
testify
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: 94109
Posts: 853
not to troll, but since when is hamilton, waterloo and the toronto area called "the golden horseshoe"?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2013, 8:30 PM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,818
Quote:
Originally Posted by easy as pie View Post
not to troll, but since when is hamilton, waterloo and the toronto area called "the golden horseshoe"?
It isn't. Hamilton, Toronto and Niagara is the Golden Horseshoe. Still, I would say Oshawa has a division between it and Toronto, though not a vey big one.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2013, 8:44 PM
MonkeyRonin's Avatar
MonkeyRonin MonkeyRonin is offline
¥ ¥ ¥
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 10,140
Quote:
Originally Posted by easy as pie View Post
not to troll, but since when is hamilton, waterloo and the toronto area called "the golden horseshoe"?

Since 1954.
__________________
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2013, 9:21 PM
isaidso isaidso is offline
The New Republic
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: United Provinces of America
Posts: 10,881
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonkeyRonin View Post
Since 1954.
Correct, it was coined by Westinghouse president in a speech to the Hamilton Chamber of Commerce, on January 12, 1954:

Quote:
Hamilton in 50 years will be the forward cleat in a 'golden horseshoe' of industrial development from Oshawa to the Niagara River...150 miles long and 50 miles (80 km) wide...It will run from Niagara Falls on the south to about Oshawa on the north and take in numerous cities and towns already there, including Hamilton and Toronto.
__________________
World's First Documented Baseball Game: Beachville, Ontario, June 4th, 1838.
World's First Documented Gridiron Game: University College, Toronto, November 9th, 1861.
Hamilton Tiger-Cats since 1869 & Toronto Argonauts since 1873: North America's 2 oldest pro football teams
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2013, 11:24 PM
Doady's Avatar
Doady Doady is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,889
Actually, Kitchener-Waterloo-Cambridge-Guelph is part of the Greater Golden Horseshoe, but not the Golden Horseshoe.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2013, 2:21 AM
LeeWilson's Avatar
LeeWilson LeeWilson is offline
proboscum
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 1,496
I've always hated the name "Golden Horseshoe" but it will never go away.
__________________
Lee
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:16 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.