Quote:
Originally Posted by the dude
it'll be nice to have those rbg lands designated as a provincial park. as mentioned, new monies will be available for park maintenance, environmental/preservation initiatives, etc. a few years ago, the talk was of making it a national park. given who's running the country now, that's likely no longer a possibility.
i'm fine with the pedestrian bridge but i really can't imagine taking a stroll beside the rhvp. count me out, thanks.
|
The Conservatives don't really oppose National Parks. They have bigger fish to fry. (Appointed Senate, politically correct programs, the debt, immigration backlog, sucking up to ethnic-minorities and quebeckers, fixing up the military, cutting taxes and transferring tax space to the provinces and keeping their party from engaging in fratricidal civil war all rank much higher than reforms to the national park system)
If anything changes it'd probably be the management of the services, because it'd prolly cheaper to hire private labour than to deal with government unions (who are powerful and ensure very generous deals.)
They seem to get a bad rap because they are against a few of the crown corporations and agencies yet noone mentions they restored the Renaissance II package that was slashed by Martin. (Then again they didn't really publicize it too well)
You know if they coordinated their tax cuts as tax space transfers to the provinces (so that the Provinces wouldn't have the appearance of raising taxes to take the tax space therefore making the move effective) then I'd say they've been one of the better governments we've had.