HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Halifax Peninsula & Downtown Dartmouth


    Monaghan Square I in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Halifax Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2016, 4:45 PM
Dmajackson's Avatar
Dmajackson Dmajackson is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: B3K Halifax, NS
Posts: 9,518
[Halifax] St. Patrick's Rectory | 27 m | 9 fl | Proposed

I'll post more information once it becomes available.

"Public Information Meeting - Case 20417
Wed, 30 November, 23:00 – Thu, 1 December, 01:00

Saint Joseph's-Alexander McKay School, 5389 Russell Street, Halifax, NS, Canada (Gym)

Case 20417 Application by Studioworks to enter into a development agreement to allow a 13 storey, 49 unit building as an addition to the existing rectory at 2267 Brunswick Street, Halifax."


This would be located in the rear of the recently renovated St. Patrick's Rectory building;


Halifax Developments Blog (Photo by David Jackson)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2016, 5:05 PM
Jonovision's Avatar
Jonovision Jonovision is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,005
I've excited to see this one. They did such a great job with the restoration of the rectory.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2016, 12:12 PM
Dmajackson's Avatar
Dmajackson Dmajackson is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: B3K Halifax, NS
Posts: 9,518
Details have been posted at Halifax.ca. No colour renderings though which makes it hard to picture. I can see a fight brewing about the 0.14 parking ratio.

Case 20417 Details
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2016, 12:52 PM
IanWatson IanWatson is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,297
AllNS had colour renderings this morning. The back side seems to look good, but I'm not thrilled about the Brunswick elevation or the north side elevation.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2016, 1:00 PM
planarchy's Avatar
planarchy planarchy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 482
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2016, 1:13 PM
Good Baklava's Avatar
Good Baklava Good Baklava is offline
Somewhat Pretentious
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Someplace somewhere
Posts: 501
Quote:
Originally Posted by planarchy View Post
Interesting... reminds me a bit of the ALT hotel by the airport.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2016, 2:01 PM
OldDartmouthMark OldDartmouthMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 8,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by planarchy View Post
For my tastes it doesn't blend very well with the neighborhood, kinda sticks out like the proverbial sore thumb.

I'm also curious at the apparent lack of windows. It would appear that the units wouldn't exactly be flush with natural light. Perhaps the white/green 'pixelated' area is actually comprised entirely of glass?

Looks like a nice Mustang on the street, though...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2016, 2:01 PM
yal yal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by planarchy View Post
Come on! They can do better than this!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2016, 4:19 PM
TheGreenBastard's Avatar
TheGreenBastard TheGreenBastard is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Halifax/Toronto
Posts: 178
Kind of short, ugly, doesn't fit with the original building's design.

As for not fitting the area, I'm sure large buildings like Ocean Towers didn't "fit" back in the day they were built.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2016, 5:13 PM
IanWatson IanWatson is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,297
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldDartmouthMark View Post
I'm also curious at the apparent lack of windows. It would appear that the units wouldn't exactly be flush with natural light. Perhaps the white/green 'pixelated' area is actually comprised entirely of glass?
I'm gonna guess they're not. That side appears to be right up against the property line; the building code would dictate that it be a solid fire wall.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2016, 5:21 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 33,829
The pattern on the blank wall side looks kind of interesting. It is more surprising to me that they have such tiny windows on the Brunswick Street side. The south and east elevations have larger windows.

I have never really understood the notion that new buildings should fit into Halifax neighbourhoods that already have a mix of buildings and styles from many different periods. I'm not sure this perspective exists in person either. Maybe from St. Patrick's school? In person, walking along Brunswick, the lower floors of the rectory will be much more prominent and the street's character probably won't change as much as the rendering suggests. I'm not sure it would be possible for a large tower to look like the rectory or the other small houses nearby, but the added density will be good for the area. It seems like an OK trade-off. If this were a really nice modern tower it would be a great addition.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2016, 6:03 PM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,248
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
I have never really understood the notion that new buildings should fit into Halifax neighbourhoods that already have a mix of buildings and styles from many different periods.

I always took those clauses as code that meant "short".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2016, 7:19 PM
OldDartmouthMark OldDartmouthMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 8,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
The pattern on the blank wall side looks kind of interesting. It is more surprising to me that they have such tiny windows on the Brunswick Street side. The south and east elevations have larger windows.

I have never really understood the notion that new buildings should fit into Halifax neighbourhoods that already have a mix of buildings and styles from many different periods. I'm not sure this perspective exists in person either. Maybe from St. Patrick's school? In person, walking along Brunswick, the lower floors of the rectory will be much more prominent and the street's character probably won't change as much as the rendering suggests. I'm not sure it would be possible for a large tower to look like the rectory or the other small houses nearby, but the added density will be good for the area. It seems like an OK trade-off. If this were a really nice modern tower it would be a great addition.
Just my opinion, based on the rendering. To my eye the new part looks kind of "cheap" compared to the materials of the buildings immediately surrounding it. Build it tall, use high-quality materials, don't try to make a statement with some odd pixelated pattern on the side - in this location, and I'll gush over how great it looks. In this case... meh.

I realize that bedbug apartments in purple and white are just down the street and Spice, which still has me scratching my head over their choice of cladding, is just down the hill. However, I'd like to see an improvement rather than settling for the low bar already set a few lots up.

Bing maps for perspective: https://www.bing.com/mapspreview?osi...=2&form=S00027

Again, just my opinion... I'm not asking anybody to agree.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2016, 7:24 PM
OldDartmouthMark OldDartmouthMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 8,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by IanWatson View Post
I'm gonna guess they're not. That side appears to be right up against the property line; the building code would dictate that it be a solid fire wall.
Didn't look like glass to me, just trying to give them the benefit of the doubt.

So it has to be a solid fire wall in case somebody builds right up to it?

Just curious, as the St. David's Hall project further south on Brunswick will be building very closely to the glass wall of the existing building. It's probably not right up to the property line, though.

https://www.google.ca/maps/@44.64444...7i13312!8i6656
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2016, 9:51 PM
OldDartmouthMark OldDartmouthMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 8,908
Duh... finally looked at the elevations, and can now see that they are solid panels (fibre cement or concrete panel or similar).

Interestingly, the lower portions are "Masonry: stone or shouldice or similar", which should, IMHO if done well, 'blend in with its surroundings'.

As usual, I can't really form a 'real' opinion until I see it in person, as renderings are usually not all that indicative of how the final product will actually look and fit in with its environment.

The green pattern will take some getting used to, I think.

As a side note, from looking at the floor plan the green/white area is where the stairwell will be, so the lack of windows makes sense.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2016, 10:09 PM
Jonovision's Avatar
Jonovision Jonovision is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,005
Not quite what I was hoping for. The elevations for the sides not shown in the rendering look a little more promising, but overall not the best.

I do appreciate though that it is a relatively skinny building. Too many of our new buildings are so fat they they just completely overwhelm.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2016, 1:06 AM
Drybrain Drybrain is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 4,194
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGreenBastard View Post
Kind of short, ugly, doesn't fit with the original building's design.

As for not fitting the area, I'm sure large buildings like Ocean Towers didn't "fit" back in the day they were built.
I'd argue they still don't.

As for this one, I might just have to wait for a new rendering to form an opinion. Not sure about the dark grey panels; a bit too imposing.

Someone123 is right though--this won't change the street's characteras much as this rendering would have one imagine. (Unless you're hovering five storeys in the air).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2016, 7:30 PM
Dmajackson's Avatar
Dmajackson Dmajackson is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: B3K Halifax, NS
Posts: 9,518
Context photo with St. Patrick's Rectory on the far right. "Ocean Towers" is immediately out of shot on the left (100m or so north of the proposal). This is taken from the middle of St. Pat's school site so presumably this vantage point will not be permanent.

Public Information Meeting is 7pm tonight at St. Joseph's - Alexander McKay on Russell Street.


Halifax Developments Blog (Photo by David Jackson)

Last edited by Dmajackson; Nov 30, 2016 at 7:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted May 26, 2017, 1:37 AM
Dmajackson's Avatar
Dmajackson Dmajackson is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: B3K Halifax, NS
Posts: 9,518
This is moving forward to Halifax Planning Advisory Committee next week.

http://www.halifax.ca/boardscom/D78P...9d78pac911.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2018, 11:23 PM
Dmajackson's Avatar
Dmajackson Dmajackson is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: B3K Halifax, NS
Posts: 9,518
This proposal is now nine storeys. New renderings are included below.

https://www.halifax.ca/sites/default...hwcc1319_0.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Halifax Peninsula & Downtown Dartmouth
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:11 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.