HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2421  
Old Posted Today, 2:44 AM
Architype's Avatar
Architype Architype is offline
♒︎ Empirically Canadian
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 🍁 Canada
Posts: 12,442
Quote:
Originally Posted by zahav View Post
...

-Last musing before I pass out from exhaustion. Turning to NL, interesting to see the figures. It seems like for many years now we have been hearing of NL's popularity, its turnaround, its growth, etc. There are so many younger people now (Gen Z) who have only known the Atlantic Canada of the 2020 and later period, and not how it once was with the young people leaving. Really starts making you feel old realizing these periods you remember so well were long before the young adults of today were born lol! Anyways, when you zoom out on NL and look past the recent years, you will see the hemoragghing out they used to be known for. For example: NL had a net -122,310 loss in the 50 year period, which works out to 22% of current population, the highest in the county. MB and SK weren't too far behind, with -17% and -18% losses compared to population. So while I'm glad NL made a turnaround, but the numbers when taken over a longer period are still generally bleak

While being appreciative of your work, it's worth mentioning that Newfoundland's population today is about 547,607, of course that's only according to the population clock estimate, but it suggests a larger turnaround than your analysis. The official peak population, from the 1991 census, was 568,475, resulting in a total net loss of only 20,868; quite different from your figure.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:11 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.