HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #6941  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2024, 2:28 AM
craigs's Avatar
craigs craigs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by jd3189 View Post
Do you guys think it would be a better idea for LA to build streetcars/ light rail again through many of the major boulevards like Sunset, Wilshire, Hollywood, etc.?
I think dedicated BRT lanes are the way to go, especially in terms of cost. We could probably have gold-standard BRT on three or four boulevards for the cost of a single light rail line on one of those boulevards. Dozens of miles of steel rails and electrification cost a lot more and require more maintenance than BRT infrastructure.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6942  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2024, 3:38 AM
Nouvellecosse's Avatar
Nouvellecosse Nouvellecosse is offline
Volatile Pacivist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 9,296
Before buses were a thing, streetcars were necessary to haul bus-sized loads. Nowadays buses can do that and if there's room for a streetcar ROW and political will for signal priority then buses can avoid traffic just as well as streetcars can. Modern streetcars can still potentially carry heavier loads than buses since they can be longer, but unless your bus route is running say, every 5 minutes and is at or near capacity, then the extra capacity isn't really needed. But if it is, then converting a really busy bus route into streetcars can reduce labour, energy, and maintence costs. So I'd say it depends how high the current and projected passenger volume on the route is.
__________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." - George Bernard Shaw
Don't ask people not to debate a topic. Just stop making debatable assertions. Problem solved.

Last edited by Nouvellecosse; Jun 18, 2024 at 6:19 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6943  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2024, 3:52 PM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,256
People would have kittens at taking away car lanes on any of the major streets to put street cars back. Give me shallow cut and cover Innovia 300 lines with platform screen doors and short headways.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6944  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2024, 3:54 PM
homebucket homebucket is online now
你的媽媽
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 9,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by k1052 View Post
People would have kittens at taking away car lanes on any of the major streets to put street cars back. Give me shallow cut and cover Innovia 300 lines with platform screen doors and short headways.
Merchants and small business owners would definitely push back against cut and cover too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6945  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2024, 3:57 PM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by homebucket View Post
Merchants and small business owners would definitely push back against cut and cover too.
This is a smaller constituency to deal with in LA than literally all drivers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6946  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2024, 6:00 PM
homebucket homebucket is online now
你的媽媽
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 9,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by k1052 View Post
This is a smaller constituency to deal with in LA than literally all drivers.
They still have a lot more power than you might think, and can tie up or delay projects just as effectively, if not more.

Regardless of which path is taken, taking lanes away for dedicated BRT vs cut and cover construction for a subway line, it is certain there will be plenty of opposition.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6947  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2024, 6:10 PM
sopas ej's Avatar
sopas ej sopas ej is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Pasadena, California
Posts: 6,934
Los Angeles doesn't do cut and cover for subway construction anymore; the last time they did that was the 1990s-early 2-thousand aughts. Even though it was blamed on the contractor, the whole Hollywood Boulevard tunnel collapse fiasco of the mid-1990s put an end to that.

It's been about tunnel boring now.
__________________
"I guess the only time people think about injustice is when it happens to them."

~ Charles Bukowski
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6948  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2024, 6:25 PM
homebucket homebucket is online now
你的媽媽
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 9,077
^ That too.

So basically the options would be TBM under all these corridors ($$$$) vs at grade light rail ($$) vs BRT ($). I think given the cost and efficacy, BRT would probably be the best option. An at grade light rail line isn't likely to be substantially faster, but have significantly more costs associated with it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6949  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2024, 6:49 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
just a pool of mushy goo
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,553
On the Purple Line Extension the running tunnels are TBM bored but the station boxes still require cut and cover construction. The speed and efficiency Metro contractors carried out excavation and temporary steel supported streets really is a feat that has gone underappreciated.
__________________
Everything new is old again

Trumpism is the road to ruin
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6950  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2024, 7:46 PM
craigs's Avatar
craigs craigs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by homebucket View Post
Regardless of which path is taken, taking lanes away for dedicated BRT vs cut and cover construction for a subway line, it is certain there will be plenty of opposition.
Opposition doesn't always stop it, though. Metro is currently removing a car travel lane on the stretch of Hollywood Boulevard between Gower and Lyman. The new road configuration includes a protected bike lane, bus boarding areas, and a central turn lane.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6951  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2024, 9:36 PM
sopas ej's Avatar
sopas ej sopas ej is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Pasadena, California
Posts: 6,934
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee View Post
On the Purple Line Extension the running tunnels are TBM bored but the station boxes still require cut and cover construction. The speed and efficiency Metro contractors carried out excavation and temporary steel supported streets really is a feat that has gone underappreciated.
I know that the station boxes are still cut and cover. But with the tunnel boring for the tunnels, though more expensive, there is no disruption at street level, only at the station box construction sites.

I remember how awful it was along Hollywood Blvd. during the subway construction back then, as well as in downtown LA in the early 1990s. Tunnel boring is so much better.
__________________
"I guess the only time people think about injustice is when it happens to them."

~ Charles Bukowski
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6952  
Old Posted Yesterday, 1:38 AM
homebucket homebucket is online now
你的媽媽
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 9,077
Quote:
Construction Nearing Completion for OC Streetcar, Opening Expected Summer 2025
Tracks and stations appear nearly complete for the 4.1-mile streetcar. Through Santa Ana much of the light rail project is accompanied by curb-protected bike lanes.
By Joe Linton
2:24 PM PDT on June 17, 2024



The Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) is nearing completion on the OC Streetcar project, a 4.15-mile long $579 million light rail line located in the Orange County cities of Santa Ana and Garden Grove.

OC Streetcar construction got underway in 2018. Its anticipated opening date is just over a year off: August 2025.

The eastern end of the OC Streetcar project will run on-street through central Santa Ana, connecting with its civic center and train station, which serves Amtrak and Metrolink, plus other bus transit connections. The western end of the route will run off-street on a historic rail corridor called the West Santa Ana Branch (where, one county and a dozen miles away, L.A. Metro is also finalizing plans for its Southeast Gateway Line light rail. Though it may be theoretically possible, it is unlikely that the two lines would connect in the foreseeable future.)
https://cal.streetsblog.org/2024/06/...ed-summer-2025
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6953  
Old Posted Yesterday, 1:41 AM
homebucket homebucket is online now
你的媽媽
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 9,077
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6954  
Old Posted Yesterday, 4:48 PM
mattropolis's Avatar
mattropolis mattropolis is offline
matt in the city
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: BC
Posts: 358
I like streetcars, but why spend 100's of millions of dollars and have no separation between the streetcar vehicles and car traffic?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6955  
Old Posted Yesterday, 5:00 PM
Jun's Avatar
Jun Jun is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Van Nuys
Posts: 315
.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6956  
Old Posted Yesterday, 5:02 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
just a pool of mushy goo
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,553
I don't know enough about this project to comment on it's actual utility, but it sounds like it would have been better to do what the above commenter said.
__________________
Everything new is old again

Trumpism is the road to ruin
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6957  
Old Posted Yesterday, 5:15 PM
202_Cyclist's Avatar
202_Cyclist 202_Cyclist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,980
I grew up in Orange County and I am excited to ride this streetcar. I also think the bicycle/pedestrian improvements look great. Orange County really missed out, however, with not building the CenterLine light-rail, which would have connected Santa Ana, South Coast Plaza, John Wayne airport, and UC Irvine.

https://ocgrandjury.org/sites/jury/f...centerline.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6958  
Old Posted Yesterday, 7:58 PM
SoCalKid SoCalKid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 476
Quote:
Originally Posted by 202_Cyclist View Post
I grew up in Orange County and I am excited to ride this streetcar. I also think the bicycle/pedestrian improvements look great. Orange County really missed out, however, with not building the CenterLine light-rail, which would have connected Santa Ana, South Coast Plaza, John Wayne airport, and UC Irvine.

https://ocgrandjury.org/sites/jury/f...centerline.pdf
Totally agreed. It would have been really nice to see transit in Orange County with its own ROW or dedicated lanes. But ~40% of this is in its own ROW, which is meaningful. I do think some trips will be somewhat time competitive with driving.

Santa Ana is one of the few urban-ish areas in Orange County, so let's hope that this gets real ridership unlike most streetcar systems in the US.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6959  
Old Posted Yesterday, 11:22 PM
LAsam LAsam is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,825
I'm fairly ignorant when it comes to Orange County. Who is the target market for this? People commuting in via Metrolink to work in Santa Ana?
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:46 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.