HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #16561  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2024, 8:51 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
just a pool of mushy goo
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 11,113
Assuming electrification, it may be easier and cheaper (than a soft ground TBM bored tunnel), to instead branch off the NCS and into the median of 190 using cut and cover and alongside the Blue Line tracks at grade and re-entering a widened or new parallel tunnel for the final 3000' or so to get into a new shared regional rail/Cta terminal station.
__________________
Everything new is old again

Trumpism is the road to ruin
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16562  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2024, 10:06 PM
nomarandlee's Avatar
nomarandlee nomarandlee is offline
My Mind Has Left My Body
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,446
I still think the cheapest and best option would be to extend the ATS a few hundreads yards running perpendicular to the current NCS O'Hare station.
An even cheaper and more practical option would be to retrofit an enclosed ped tunnel to the ATS Rental Car station from the current NSC O'Hare station.

I took the NCS from Prospect Heights to Terminal 2 a few months ago and once you are on the ATS it is not too bad in terms of convenience to the rest of the airport other than the open-air walk of a few hundred feet between the two stations. Take out that walking segment and you can easily find a target market who would use the service, particularly those leaving from T5.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16563  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2024, 10:08 PM
VKChaz VKChaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: California
Posts: 594
This Chicago Tribune op ed from July raises the issue of a connection between the North Western and Amtrak tracks. Is such a thing possible and is there any chance it (or any alternative) would actually be seriously studied and put into motion?

Quote:
In September 2022, the Department of Buildings issued a permit for the construction of a 33-story apartment building at 350 N. Canal St. This past May, the new tower welcomed its first tenants.
But when the city signed off on the new building, it inadvertently foreclosed on the possibility of a critically needed regional transportation asset: 350 N. Canal blocks a potential connection of the former Chicago & North Western Railway’s tracks serving the Ogilvie Transportation Center with the Amtrak main line that brings trains from north of the city into Amtrak’s Chicago Union Station.

----

If CMAP does decide to contemplate a Union Pacific-Union Station hookup, there may just be one opportunity left to make it happen. The Union Pacific still uses one of the old ground-level tracks to deliver tankcars of corn syrup to the east side of the Blommer Chocolate Co. factory at Kinzie and Des Plaines streets. Blommer has announced it will soon close that facility and sell the property for demolition and redevelopment. IDOT, CMAP, CDOT, Metra, Amtrak and UP need to sit down and study whether the Blommer tracks that now stub on the north side of Kinzie can be extended across Kinzie into the one block of Jefferson Street between Kinzie and the Amtrak main line. At the south end of that block, the track could be curved eastward to join the Amtrak alignment into Union Station.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/2024/...ation-ogilvie/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16564  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2024, 11:15 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,467
Quote:
f CMAP does decide to contemplate a Union Pacific-Union Station hookup, there may just be one opportunity left to make it happen. The Union Pacific still uses one of the old ground-level tracks to deliver tankcars of corn syrup to the east side of the Blommer Chocolate Co. factory at Kinzie and Des Plaines streets. Blommer has announced it will soon close that facility and sell the property for demolition and redevelopment. IDOT, CMAP, CDOT, Metra, Amtrak and UP need to sit down and study whether the Blommer tracks that now stub on the north side of Kinzie can be extended across Kinzie into the one block of Jefferson Street between Kinzie and the Amtrak main line. At the south end of that block, the track could be curved eastward to join the Amtrak alignment into Union Station.
Oh geez, that sounds like hell trying to connect those two points. I'm not even sure if Metra's rolling stock would be able to make sharp enough turns for such a connection
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16565  
Old Posted Oct 7, 2024, 6:26 PM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,279
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomarandlee View Post
An even cheaper and more practical option would be to retrofit an enclosed ped tunnel to the ATS Rental Car station from the current NSC O'Hare station.
Yeah just do an elevated connecting walkway around the north side of the CONRAC.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16566  
Old Posted Oct 8, 2024, 1:29 AM
Tcmetro Tcmetro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 116
I thought that there was some kind of funding awarded to add a walkway through the garage between the Metra station and the ATS.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16567  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2024, 1:45 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tcmetro View Post
I thought that there was some kind of funding awarded to add a walkway through the garage between the Metra station and the ATS.
Going thru the garage at the 2nd floor level would be ideal since it lines up with the ATS concourse and the hallway could (maybe) be climate-controlled, but that would require new elevators at the east end of the garage.

It's probably gonna end up as an outdoor covered walkway over the existing sidewalk.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16568  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2024, 7:49 PM
VKChaz VKChaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: California
Posts: 594
City still working on a Greyhound and inter-city bus solution

Quote:
Greyhound says it's close to lease extension at West Loop station
https://chicago.suntimes.com/transpo...-station-lease

Quote:
Transit advocates have urged the city to buy the Greyhound station or build a new one. The city has said it doesn’t have the money.

If Greyhound loses its station, Chicago would be the largest city in the Northern Hemisphere without a bus station with indoor accommodations, the Chaddick Institute reported last month.
Is there a way the existing site could support a multi-use structure that generates revenue from above a station or is that not feasible on that footprint?
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:31 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.