HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5301  
Old Posted Yesterday, 4:46 PM
skyhigh07 skyhigh07 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,025
Quote:
Originally Posted by nemesisinphilly View Post
This whole district is just a fit over the 12th St Gym building being allowed to be built.
Whether or not the 12th St Gym site should have been redeveloped, the street level facade of the new building is not great. It really got dragged on the neighborhood forums. I tend to personally agree. It doesn’t blend well with the surrounding buildings and it has a sort of obtrusive, heavy presence. I was hoping it’d be a lot better based on the renderings.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5302  
Old Posted Yesterday, 5:04 PM
nemesisinphilly nemesisinphilly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 199
Quote:
Originally Posted by skyhigh07 View Post
Whether or not the 12th St Gym site should have been redeveloped, the street level facade of the new building is not great. It really got dragged on the neighborhood forums. I tend to personally agree. It doesn’t blend well with the surrounding buildings and it has a sort of obtrusive, heavy presence. I was hoping it’d be a lot better based on the renderings.
Well the disagreement between myself and people like you is that a new building has to blend in with existing buildings which span 240+ years of construction. It doesn't. It creates a new aesthetic to move forward with not be shackled to the designs of the past. I understand many here think we live in a museum and that everything needs to fit a look from 100 years ago. I just strongly disagree.

People can have their personal preferences but unless your money is on the line I find it repulsive to force the people taking the risk to bow down to the vague preferences of a dozen unelected busybodies.

If you expect everything built to look like the St James almost nothing will get built.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5303  
Old Posted Yesterday, 5:57 PM
skyhigh07 skyhigh07 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,025
Quote:
Originally Posted by nemesisinphilly View Post
Well the disagreement between myself and people like you is that a new building has to blend in with existing buildings which span 240+ years of construction. It doesn't. It creates a new aesthetic to move forward with not be shackled to the designs of the past. I understand many here think we live in a museum and that everything needs to fit a look from 100 years ago. I just strongly disagree.

People can have their personal preferences but unless your money is on the line I find it repulsive to force the people taking the risk to bow down to the vague preferences of a dozen unelected busybodies.

If you expect everything built to look like the St James almost nothing will get built.
I don’t think it necessarily even has to blend. Like so much in the US and frankly Philly, it’s just an overall poor design. There’s tons of high quality, thoughtful modern architecture in Europe that contrasts beautifully, particularly in The Netherlands and Scandinavia.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5304  
Old Posted Yesterday, 6:22 PM
Justin7 Justin7 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 854
The Historical Commission's definition of hardship is broken and therefore the Historical Commission is broken.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5305  
Old Posted Yesterday, 8:20 PM
William Van Alen William Van Alen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by skyhigh07 View Post
I don’t think it necessarily even has to blend. Like so much in the US and frankly Philly, it’s just an overall poor design. There’s tons of high quality, thoughtful modern architecture in Europe that contrasts beautifully, particularly in The Netherlands and Scandinavia.
This. I recently took a friend who is quite the "new buildings and transplants are ruining the character of the city" type to the new Piazza buildings recently and he absolutely loved it. Thought it was pretty telling and that a lot of people who feel the same way probably would hate new builds (and new residents) less if our new architecture was higher quality.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5306  
Old Posted Yesterday, 9:26 PM
sooperpaz sooperpaz is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 165
[delete]

Last edited by sooperpaz; Yesterday at 9:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5307  
Old Posted Today, 3:30 PM
Arch+Eng's Avatar
Arch+Eng Arch+Eng is online now
Arch. Engineer+Developer
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: PHL
Posts: 380
Wynnefield Heights Square

Anyone with a subscription that can extract from this link?

https://www.bizjournals.com/philadel...les-begin.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5308  
Old Posted Today, 3:41 PM
PHLtoNYC PHLtoNYC is online now
Chris
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,110
Nice project at a good price point too.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arch+Eng View Post
Anyone with a subscription that can extract from this link?

https://www.bizjournals.com/philadel...les-begin.html
The project at 4050 Conshohocken Ave., called Wynnefield Heights Square, launched pre-sales last week with 142 condo units starting at $289,000 and 27 townhomes starting at $499,000. Noah Ostroff, founder of the PhillyLiving real estate team and partner at Keller Williams Empower, said he believes it is one of the largest for-sale residential projects currently being built in Philadelphia and will create "a whole neighborhood."

Ostroff, who is leading the sales effort on the project for developer Borkson Properties, said they plan on "starting slow" and letting the pace of sales dictate an exact timeline for the full buildout over roughly two years. A first phase of construction will kick off in October with five townhomes and 12 condos. The initial homes should be completed in January or February.

The project will ultimately be capped by an 83-unit apartment building, according to Ostroff.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5309  
Old Posted Today, 3:59 PM
PhilliesPhan's Avatar
PhilliesPhan PhilliesPhan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,291
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arch+Eng View Post
Anyone with a subscription that can extract from this link?

https://www.bizjournals.com/philadel...les-begin.html
I remember this project going through the CDR process a while ago. I'd actually consider buying one of the rowhomes if I were in the market! I actually like that area a lot: it's uniformly middle-class, very racially diverse, steps away from Fairmount Park, and close to the shops and restaurants of East Falls, Manayunk, and the Main Line. It's not the most walkable area and the Cynwyd Line doesn't run often enough for me to rely on it like I do the R6 Manayunk/Norristown, but I'd seriously consider a rowhome in that neighborhood for that price.
__________________
No one outsmarts a Fox!

Temple University '18 ']['
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5310  
Old Posted Today, 4:54 PM
3rd&Brown 3rd&Brown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,571
Here's the website for the project if you're interested.

https://www.wynnefieldheightssquare.com/

Looks pretty good for me. Not exactly walkable but not not walkable at the same time. It's only 2 blocks to the Target on City Avenue and maybe 4 the the Bala Shopping Plaza. It's directly across the street from a Fresh Grocer. Plenty of opportunity in this area when looking at google maps for similar infill.

It will be interesting to see who the buyers end up being.

I could see it appealing to young upwardly mobile black professionals. Could also see a scenario in which Hasidic Jewish families settle here as well, as there's a growing population of Orthodox Jews in Overbrook Park. We'll see.

Feels well timed given interest rates are coming down somewhat precipitously.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5311  
Old Posted Today, 6:28 PM
Raja Raja is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3rd&Brown View Post
Here's the website for the project if you're interested.

https://www.wynnefieldheightssquare.com/

Looks pretty good for me. Not exactly walkable but not not walkable at the same time. It's only 2 blocks to the Target on City Avenue and maybe 4 the the Bala Shopping Plaza. It's directly across the street from a Fresh Grocer. Plenty of opportunity in this area when looking at google maps for similar infill.

It will be interesting to see who the buyers end up being.

I could see it appealing to young upwardly mobile black professionals. Could also see a scenario in which Hasidic Jewish families settle here as well, as there's a growing population of Orthodox Jews in Overbrook Park. We'll see.

Feels well timed given interest rates are coming down somewhat precipitously.
Apropos of our previous discussion on Northbank, Naval Square, Siena Place, etc. -- the townhome part of this, at least, should do very well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5312  
Old Posted Today, 6:34 PM
Arch+Eng's Avatar
Arch+Eng Arch+Eng is online now
Arch. Engineer+Developer
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: PHL
Posts: 380
Anyone else here use Google Earth alot and hate Mark Henninger?

Like, I appreciate the effort of documenting every street, and sometimes you get into alleyways google has not, but its SUPER annoying when your streetviews override googles.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5313  
Old Posted Today, 6:59 PM
InvisibleMan InvisibleMan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arch+Eng View Post
Anyone else here use Google Earth alot and hate Mark Henninger?

Like, I appreciate the effort of documenting every street, and sometimes you get into alleyways google has not, but its SUPER annoying when your streetviews override googles.
YES lol it was especially annoying when you couldn't change the street view date on mobile
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5314  
Old Posted Today, 7:03 PM
3rd&Brown 3rd&Brown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,571
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raja View Post
Apropos of our previous discussion on Northbank, Naval Square, Siena Place, etc. -- the townhome part of this, at least, should do very well.
It's effectively all townhomes. It's confusing because there is an apartment building (shown in the rendering), but the "condos" are simply duplex townhomes. The 4 floor townhomes are the "condos" and the 3 floor townhomes are the SFH. The multi-unit building comes later and is rentals.

It should all do well.

And agreed on other points.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5315  
Old Posted Today, 9:17 PM
SEFTA's Avatar
SEFTA SEFTA is online now
Philly Pholly
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,284
Quote:
Originally Posted by PHLtoNYC View Post
^ 9/19
800 block of N 2nd

The black with balconies looks cool actually, makes it appear higher quality than it actually is. The building to the right is okay, but I fear that white color won't age well.

And is it just the picture, or is the ground floor on those buildings really short? I figured the ground floor would need to be ~12'+ to accommodate a restaurant or grocer.
I agree. I worry how these dark finishes will wear.

Activity at N Broad Ballet site I hear.
__________________
Smart Cities
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:58 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.