HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2024, 12:41 PM
BigDipper 80 BigDipper 80 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 166
I feel like it's really hard to capture how huge the Key Tower actually is in photos. It's pretty crazy that a mid-sized Rust Belt city has a 947 foot tall skyscraper.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2024, 1:22 PM
mrnyc mrnyc is offline
cle/west village/shaolin
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 11,903
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDipper 80 View Post
I feel like it's really hard to capture how huge the Key Tower actually is in photos. It's pretty crazy that a mid-sized Rust Belt city has a 947 foot tall skyscraper.
nah, but if you still want pretty crazy you should check out the ameritrust tower renders prior to the merger that canceled it. much taller. and if you want truly wild and crazy check out the early gehry progressive tower that didn’t happen either.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2024, 1:48 PM
East72nd East72nd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 64
Buffalo

Punches way above its weight, it just needs larger companies to improve and expand its downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2024, 5:22 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 29,934
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDipper 80 View Post
I feel like it's really hard to capture how huge the Key Tower actually is in photos. It's pretty crazy that a mid-sized Rust Belt city has a 947 foot tall skyscraper.
It's still the tallest building in the midwest/rustbelt (outside of Chicago) for more than three decades now, and by a fairly comfortable margin.

Though, the height figure is padded a bit by its 60' spire on top. Taking the roof height of 888' makes Pittsburgh"s 841' US Steel Tower fairly close in height.




Quote:
Originally Posted by East72nd View Post
Buffalo...Punches way above its weight
As a city, yes.

But as a skyline, I'd say it's been a big underperformer for a while now.

Buffalo hasn't built a new building over 300' tall for 50 years now.

One of these decades.......
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.

Last edited by Steely Dan; Apr 22, 2024 at 5:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2024, 6:49 PM
iheartthed iheartthed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 9,995
Based mostly on the data from the SSP diagram, here's some skyline "health" data for cities we consider Great Lakes and/or adjacent Rust Belt:

Average Height of 10 Tallest
Chicago: 1,070 feet
Pittsburgh: 614 feet
Detroit: 564 feet
Cleveland: 555 feet
Milwaukee: 460 feet
St. Louis: 454 feet
Buffalo: 332 feet

Average Age of 10 Tallest
Buffalo: 82.3 years
Detroit: 55.6 years
Pittsburgh: 49.3 years
St. Louis: 48.1 years
Cleveland: 42.6 years
Chicago: 28.5 years
Milwaukee: 24.4 years

Buffalo has the oldest skyline of this group by a country mile, while Milwaukee slightly edges out Chicago for the youngest. Buffalo also has the shortest skyline of this group.

Half of Detroit's top 10 are the Ren Cen towers and considering them as one single building would drive down Detroit's average height to 530 feet, and rank it below Cleveland. Detroit's average age would go up to 65.6 years, remaining the second oldest skyline among this group.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2024, 7:45 PM
IrishIllini IrishIllini is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,187
Not a huge change for Detroit if you consider the Renaissance Center as one building.

Height is nice, but I'd 100% trade several of Chicago's towers on or adjacent to a podium for mid rises, even if it made the skyline less "impressive" from certain viewpoints. Bad podiums are a streetscape killer globally, but especially so in cities hit hard by abandonment, urban renewal, and car-centric planning and development.

It has gotten better in Chicago, but the bad ones that went tall 20+ years ago and quite bad.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2024, 9:26 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 29,934
Quote:
Originally Posted by East72nd View Post

Average Height of 10 Tallest
Chicago: 1,070 feet
Pittsburgh: 614 feet
Detroit: 564 feet
Cleveland: 555 feet
Milwaukee: 460 feet
St. Louis: 454 feet
Buffalo: 332 feet
And if you went back in time about 20 years to before Milwaukee started it's tower mini-boom, its top 10 average would've only been 379', which was more in Buffalo's league at the time, rather than St. Louis's.
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2024, 7:02 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 29,934
Quote:
Originally Posted by iheartthed View Post
here's some skyline "health" data for cities we consider Great Lakes and/or adjacent Rust Belt:
I went ahead and filled in the rest of the Midwest's significant skylines, using CTBUH data.


Average Height of 10 Tallest:

Chicago: 1,112 feet
Minneapolis: 627 feet
Pittsburgh: 614 feet
Cleveland: 562 feet
Detroit: 560 feet
Columbus: 498 feet
Kansas City: 463 feet
Milwaukee: 460 feet
Cincinnati: 455 feet
St. Louis: 454 feet
Indianapolis: 440 feet
Buffalo: 332 feet

Source: CTBUH



KC, Milwaukee, Cincy, and St. Louis are all within 9 feet of each other on this metric!
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.

Last edited by Steely Dan; Apr 23, 2024 at 7:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2024, 7:32 PM
East72nd East72nd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 64
M&T Buffalo

They did a fantastic job renovating this building especially the skin. Before it was just a brutalist nothing, now a true gem.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2024, 2:08 AM
pj3000's Avatar
pj3000 pj3000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pittsburgh & Miami
Posts: 7,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steely Dan View Post
I went ahead and filled in the rest of the Midwest's significant skylines, using CTBUH data.


Average Height of 10 Tallest:

Chicago: 1,112 feet
Minneapolis: 627 feet
Pittsburgh: 614 feet
Cleveland: 562 feet
Detroit: 560 feet
Columbus: 498 feet
Kansas City: 463 feet
Milwaukee: 460 feet
Cincinnati: 455 feet
St. Louis: 454 feet
Indianapolis: 440 feet
Buffalo: 332 feet

Source: CTBUH



KC, Milwaukee, Cincy, and St. Louis are all within 9 feet of each other on this metric!
How do Rochester, Baltimore, and Philadelphia stack up on this list since we’re stretching this definition of Midwest?

I mean, Pittsburgh is way more Philly and Baltimore rustbelt than it is Minneapolis, Kansas City, and Indianapolis midwest.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2024, 10:47 PM
MayDay's Avatar
MayDay MayDay is offline
Member of SSP since 1997
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 7,118
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDipper 80 View Post
I feel like it's really hard to capture how huge the Key Tower actually is in photos. It's pretty crazy that a mid-sized Rust Belt city has a 947 foot tall skyscraper.
It’s not so crazy if you’re familiar with the history and time period leading up to its construction, when Cleveland (as with so many other aspects) punched well above its weight in the banking and finance sector.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2024, 12:56 AM
Wigs's Avatar
Wigs Wigs is offline
Great White Norf
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Niagara Region
Posts: 11,101
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steely Dan View Post
I wasn't trying to mock Buffalo, just lamenting its anemic skyline growth over the past half century.
I just meant that list made it seem like "poor Buffalo". It's hard for its Perma-rust belt image to start to fade away

Quote:
Originally Posted by MayDay View Post
It’s not so crazy if you’re familiar with the history and time period leading up to its construction, when Cleveland (as with so many other aspects) punched well above its weight in the banking and finance sector.
Back when KeyBank was a top 10 bank if not closer to top 5? I was a 10-11 year old in awe at the "Society Center"
Please correct me for my lack of CLEknowledge

Now, shockingly, it's been surpassed by Buffalo based M&T Bank. The former HSBC tower is now mixed use with terracotta/gun metal paint job, M&T logo/$58M tech hub.
For 50 years Buffalo didn't have much to boast about, okay

Wiki (West facing view towards Can-a-duh)


The rankings might change with the 1st quarter 2024 release
https://www.federalreserve.gov/relea...nt/default.htm
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:09 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.