Quote:
Originally Posted by kwoldtimer
I had the same reaction, so I did a bit of on-line reading and, apparently, there were examples of the practice. Whether that applies to the Beeton church, I don't know, and your two aisles explanation seems more likely to me. I note that the United Church in Beeton also has two front entrance doors (on a symmetrical façade).
|
Warning! Long and boring post but there is material about church architecture as such and at least some of what I write applies to Protestant church structures other than just Presbyterian.
Thanks for your follow up. I have an interest in history of many sorts; including the Presbyterian tradition to which I belong and I would like to know more. Could you send me a private message with the links you found? There are exceptions to just about every rule but I do think gender separation would be at least unusual in a Canadian Presbyterian Church. I'll mention two reasons that are relevant to a board of this type, architecture and money
Firstly, a social practice like segregation of the sexes, will have to be facilitated architecturally and leave marks on the structure. Your note about the two doors might be an example of that factor. However, the more important thing is that you would have to have some form of demarcation in the interior. A physical barrier of some sort would be the obvious solution but I have been in a lot of older Presbyterian churches and can't recall ever seeing one. A centre aisle would even do but as I stated, many of the older churches in the country have two side aisles and three sections of seating. In fact, I would say this might even be the most common arrangement in many parts of the country. The middle section is the largest by far and most people would sit (still sit) in those areas. It would be difficult to arrange gender segregation in that kind of setup. If you wanted to have it, you would arrange the pews differently.
City churches in the Protestant traditions in the late 19 century often were built in what might be called an amphitheatre style with horseshoe or circular balconies and a high central pulpit over a small central communion table. Often an "Akron Plan" Sunday School area was built behind the sanctuary. Aisles converged, as it were, towards that central focus. Without going into further boring detail, I will only say that this style of architecture also would not be adopted by people who believed in gender segregation. The point with respect to both kinds of churches is not exactly that you could not enforce gender serration in these churches, though it would be difficult. It is rather that if gender segregation were a practice, you would design the church differently.
To move to a more positive way of stating my point, family worship was very important in pious Presbyterian and in Protestant homes of many traditions. When those families went to church, they also normally sat as families. This is where the money comes in also! The older way of financing the church in many instances was not primarily a free will offering but rather what was called "pew rent." That was just what it sounds like. A family would rent a particular pew and have the right to occupy it every Sunday. In some older churches, they have never removed the numbered bronze plaques that would identify these pews and you can see them to this very day. This was a very strong indication that family seating was the normal practice. (And an incentive towards family seating!)
At a certain point, of course, young people would want to get away from their families, as they have done from time immemorial. I can certainly conceive of churches wanting to discourage adolescent boys and girls from sitting together. It would be most unseemly to have their flirting disturb the decorum of the worship of Almighty God, perhaps particularly in the Almighty's sometimes rather grim Presbyterian form!
I was going to try to post some pictures of some beautiful older churches I have come across anyways, but I think some of the photos might also evidence what I have been writing about.