HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5521  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2021, 4:36 PM
numble numble is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 171
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
Ron Tutor fully admitted that he underbids these projects and then makes billions on (foreseeable) change orders, so I'm not surprised their bid was thrown out.

https://californiapolicycenter.org/h...ntract-awards/

BYD is the devil you don't know. There's not a lot of data on monorail projects so their numbers can't be verified. It should be pretty obvious that an elevated line is cheaper than one that's mostly in subway.
BYD is already known for their poor electric buses and extreme political lobbying: https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/...520-story.html

BYD is the Technology Supplier, Systems Integrator and is a Operations and Maintenance Co-Lead Contractor for the LA SkyRail proposal. LA SkyRail will have Skanska as the lead construction contractor, which is 3 years late and around $400m in budget overruns on the Regional Connector and looking to be 1 year late with $200m overruns so far on the Purple Line Section 1. Metro’s latest rail contracts have been awarded to Tutor for Purple Line Sections 2 & 3, and they are still tracking to be on schedule and on budget, even after a yearlong delay for oil wells underneath Beverly Hills High. If it was really based on experience with contractors, they have had better recent experience managing Tutor than Skanska.

It’s obvious from looking at the proposals that Bechtel and BYD spent a lot more time and money on their bids, probably because they don’t have much experience in the US and are looking to make this project their standout project and try to get more business in the US.

Last edited by numble; Feb 26, 2021 at 5:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5522  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2021, 5:30 PM
Easy's Avatar
Easy Easy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,257
Quote:
Originally Posted by numble View Post
BYD is already known for their poor electric buses and extreme political lobbying: https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/...520-story.html

BYD is the Technology Supplier, Systems Integrator and is a Operations and Maintenance Co-Lead Contractor for the LA SkyRail proposal. LA SkyRail will have Skanska as the lead construction contractor, which is 3 years late and around $400m in budget overruns on the Regional Connector and looking to be 1 year late with $200m overruns so far on the Purple Line Section 1. Metro’s latest rail contracts have been awarded to Tutor for Purple Line Sections 2 & 3, and they are still tracking to be on schedule and on budget, even after a yearlong delay for oil wells underneath Beverly Hills High. If it was really based on experience with contractors, they have had better recent experience managing Tutor than Skanska.

It’s obvious from looking at the proposals that Bechtel and BYD spent a lot more time and money on their bids, probably because they don’t have much experience in the US and are looking to make this project their standout project and try to get more business in the US.
I’ve seen you write this a few times in different places and it’s confused me. Bechtel is based in Virginia and has lots of US experience. They are the lead on the existing Silver line extension in Virginia that is opening a year late.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5523  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2021, 10:27 PM
Quixote's Avatar
Quixote Quixote is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,216
The HRT rolling stock and stations should be designed to the same specifications as the Purple/Red Lines, with the goal/expectation that the latter will eventually be separated and converted to automation (while not precluding, say, Purple interlining with Sepulveda). This would allow for more frequent service, thereby yielding higher ridership and greater farebox revenue that could then be used to finance infill stations (Vermont/3rd, Wilshire/Crenshaw, etc). Any increase in travel times resulting from those infill stations would be offset by the shorter wait times owing to the more frequent headways.

This should be the type of thinking that dictates long-term planning. We need to be thinking of ways to design a system that not only connects important points of interest, but also one that serves communities and is able to spur political momentum toward implementing urban-minded infrastructure (continental crosswalks at every intersection, road diets, wider sidewalks, bulb-outs, etc) within these communities. The only thing holding LA back is this level of imagination and NIMBYs, who are slowly but surely continuing to lose the long-drawn-out war they've been able to sustain for decades.

Last edited by Quixote; Feb 27, 2021 at 10:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5524  
Old Posted Yesterday, 1:10 AM
electricron's Avatar
electricron electricron is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Granbury, Texas
Posts: 3,205
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quixote View Post
The only thing holding LA back is this level of imagination and NIMBYs, who are slowly but surely continuing to lose the long-drawn-out war they've been able to sustain for decades.
Why dish in NIMBYs so hard? They are just homeowners looking out for their main, probably only, investment. Citizens from all income levels, from the richest to the poorest, have joined the NIMBY ranks. It is not just the richest neighborhoods that do not want public housing in their neighborhoods, likewise the poorest neighborhoods do not want to see their neighborhood generified into higher rent apartments and condos. NIMBYs exist world wide.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5525  
Old Posted Yesterday, 2:11 AM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Leftist Correctist
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 6,971
For serious hardcore nimby action google Stuttgart 21.
__________________
GOP RIP
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5526  
Old Posted Yesterday, 2:54 AM
mthd mthd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 873
i am curious if BYD has actually solved the many problems/inefficiencies of monorails... or if it's just marketing fluff. the cross section of the trains is very promising compared to the older hitachi systems, but what enables this magic? how will they solve the evacuation walkways which do not appear to be shown anywhere? switching has always been hideous on these things, i see they have videos of a bending/switching center beam, but how long has this been actually used for? the yinchuan system is ... 3 years old?

the idea of tiny three car consists (231 passenger crush capacity, 56 seats!) running very frequently is interesting, but they'd have to run awfully frequently to be appropriate for fully grade separated transit in north america's second biggest metro area. a 10 car BART train can hold 2,000 people, a 6 car red line train, 1,080. red/B line claims 20k people per hour, BART at peak theoretically could do 50k. a 3 car skyrail train doesn't even pencil, so it's curious that every single drawing or photo shows 3 car consists (for automatic coupling?) obviously their peak capacity numbers are based on 6 are 8 cars. why don't they show them? i can't find a single picture of the one in yinchuan operating with more than 3 cars. skyrail/huawei's own PR video specifically states that it's a 3 car system, 600 passengers per train.

gensler put a lot of trendy fluff on the stations, but man, they are seriously poorly located with long winding circuitous walkways to the spots they *should* be... and then it's labeled "seamless connectivity." LOL.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5527  
Old Posted Yesterday, 2:59 AM
numble numble is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 171
Quote:
Originally Posted by Easy View Post
I’ve seen you write this a few times in different places and it’s confused me. Bechtel is based in Virginia and has lots of US experience. They are the lead on the existing Silver line extension in Virginia that is opening a year late.
They don’t have very much experience in U.S. transit projects, and its true.

At their Q4 conference call, Tutor Perini’s CEO said the major players in the US are them, Skanska and Kiewit, and he does not see Bechtel being a major player with only one contract.

In their bid for the Sepulveda project, they list 4 projects to demonstrate their experience, only one of which is a U.S. transit project (the Silver Line). The other projects listed are a Toronto transit extension and 2 liquid natural gas projects.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5528  
Old Posted Yesterday, 6:25 AM
hughfb3 hughfb3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 542
Something to take into consideration is the world we live in today and for the foreseeable future. Metro's ridership has been decimated by the pandemic. People no longer want to be indoors or underground in enclosed spaces with crowds of people. Metro's ticket fares have all but depleted. County Sales taxes are indefinitely impacted by the closing of stores and restaurants as shopping for non essentials moves online. The structures in technology and communication have solidified the remote working of a large portion of the workforce.

Any Heavy Rail option from Van Nuys to LAX is minimum $20 Billion Dollars. Metro has a projected amount of $9.7 Billion allocated for this project from Sales tax projections that were crafted in 2016... and that did not take into account a pandemic.

At this point, we will be "lucky" if we can get anything.

Last edited by hughfb3; Yesterday at 6:49 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5529  
Old Posted Yesterday, 10:49 AM
numble numble is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 171
Quote:
Originally Posted by hughfb3 View Post
Something to take into consideration is the world we live in today and for the foreseeable future. Metro's ridership has been decimated by the pandemic. People no longer want to be indoors or underground in enclosed spaces with crowds of people. Metro's ticket fares have all but depleted. County Sales taxes are indefinitely impacted by the closing of stores and restaurants as shopping for non essentials moves online. The structures in technology and communication have solidified the remote working of a large portion of the workforce.

Any Heavy Rail option from Van Nuys to LAX is minimum $20 Billion Dollars. Metro has a projected amount of $9.7 Billion allocated for this project from Sales tax projections that were crafted in 2016... and that did not take into account a pandemic.

At this point, we will be "lucky" if we can get anything.
California collects sales taxes for online purchases and the sales tax collections for Metro have not had as large an impact on Metro as was initially expected. Metro received $862 million in the March 2020 stimulus bill, will receive a similar amount from the December 2020 stimulus bill and will probably receive something like $1.3 billion from the upcoming stimulus bill if it passes the Senate in the same form it passed the House. In other words, they will be receiving nearly $3 billion from the COVID relief packages. With an infrastructure bill in the works, and a plan for Congress to allow earmarks again, Metro might receive even more funding.

Meanwhile, as of January 2021, their sales tax revenues have only been down $260 million since the pandemic began. That looks like a lot, but in 5 of the past months, sales tax revenues were actually higher than the year before.



Metro’s finance team itself predicted that total sales tax losses across 3 years will only be around $190 million and that sales tax revenues are expected to be up next year. “ It is anticipated that sales tax revenue will finally exceed the pre-COVID-19 peak set in FY19 and reach $865.0 million per ordinance in FY22, a 2.9% increase from the FY21 Midyear Reforecast.”


https://metro.legistar.com/Legislati...EB0&FullText=1

You are incorrect that the sales tax calculations didn’t account for the pandemic. Of course it doesn’t predict pandemics, but it expects recessions that have a larger impact on Metro’s revenues than the pandemic has had. The sales tax expenditure plans for Measures R and M leaves a huge amount of unallocated amounts to account for things like downturns in the economy. This is why Measure R projects like the Purple Line, Expo Line 2, Gold Line to Azusa, Crenshaw Line, Regional Connector etc. were not affected by the Great Recession, which had a far larger impact on Metro’s budget. For example, in Measure M, they estimate $60 billion in transit and highway funding for 40 years, but only program for about $30 billion.

Last edited by numble; Yesterday at 11:00 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5530  
Old Posted Yesterday, 3:22 PM
electricron's Avatar
electricron electricron is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Granbury, Texas
Posts: 3,205
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by numble View Post
California collects sales taxes for online purchases and the sales tax collections for Metro have not had as large an impact on Metro as was initially expected. Metro received $862 million in the March 2020 stimulus bill, will receive a similar amount from the December 2020 stimulus bill and will probably receive something like $1.3 billion from the upcoming stimulus bill if it passes the Senate in the same form it passed the House. In other words, they will be receiving nearly $3 billion from the COVID relief packages. With an infrastructure bill in the works, and a plan for Congress to allow earmarks again, Metro might receive even more funding.

Meanwhile, as of January 2021, their sales tax revenues have only been down $260 million since the pandemic began. That looks like a lot, but in 5 of the past months, sales tax revenues were actually higher than the year before.

Metro’s finance team itself predicted that total sales tax losses across 3 years will only be around $190 million and that sales tax revenues are expected to be up next year. “ It is anticipated that sales tax revenue will finally exceed the pre-COVID-19 peak set in FY19 and reach $865.0 million per ordinance in FY22, a 2.9% increase from the FY21 Midyear Reforecast.”

https://metro.legistar.com/Legislati...EB0&FullText=1

You are incorrect that the sales tax calculations didn’t account for the pandemic. Of course it doesn’t predict pandemics, but it expects recessions that have a larger impact on Metro’s revenues than the pandemic has had. The sales tax expenditure plans for Measures R and M leaves a huge amount of unallocated amounts to account for things like downturns in the economy. This is why Measure R projects like the Purple Line, Expo Line 2, Gold Line to Azusa, Crenshaw Line, Regional Connector etc. were not affected by the Great Recession, which had a far larger impact on Metro’s budget. For example, in Measure M, they estimate $60 billion in transit and highway funding for 40 years, but only program for about $30 billion.
Numbers do not lie. While it is true that in 5 of the last months sales tax revenues are higher than the previous year; where you left it as a final thought; what you left out is that it is still true the sales tax revenues still remain below what they projected it would be pre covid.

By how much one may ask, the answer is right there in the charts, just look at the bottom line of the last chart.
I'll repeat it right here so you do not have to take the time to go look:
COVID 19 (% loss)
FY20=$48.3 Million(-5.5%),FY21=$69.2 Million(7.6%),FY22=$72.3 Million(-7.7%)

Of course future projections will not necessarily be the final results, but the important point I wish to point out is that the loses are accruing, seemingly getting larger each following year.

Why are they projecting that? Because they are projecting normal growth and revenues from sales taxes based on top of a new lower starting line.
And that means over the course of accruing over a time period of decades much lower revenues.

The stimulus package passing through Congress will probably make up for the losses for the last year and this year, it will most likely not make up for the accruing loses for the next few decades.

Last edited by electricron; Yesterday at 3:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5531  
Old Posted Yesterday, 5:40 PM
numble numble is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 171
Quote:
Originally Posted by electricron View Post
Numbers do not lie. While it is true that in 5 of the last months sales tax revenues are higher than the previous year; where you left it as a final thought; what you left out is that it is still true the sales tax revenues still remain below what they projected it would be pre covid.

By how much one may ask, the answer is right there in the charts, just look at the bottom line of the last chart.
I'll repeat it right here so you do not have to take the time to go look:
COVID 19 (% loss)
FY20=$48.3 Million(-5.5%),FY21=$69.2 Million(7.6%),FY22=$72.3 Million(-7.7%)

Of course future projections will not necessarily be the final results, but the important point I wish to point out is that the loses are accruing, seemingly getting larger each following year.

Why are they projecting that? Because they are projecting normal growth and revenues from sales taxes based on top of a new lower starting line.
And that means over the course of accruing over a time period of decades much lower revenues.

The stimulus package passing through Congress will probably make up for the losses for the last year and this year, it will most likely not make up for the accruing loses for the next few decades.
I already wrote that they expected losses for 3 years to be $190 million. They received $862 million from the March 2020 stimulus bill and will receive something like $850 million from the December 2020 stimulus bill, and they will receive around $1.3 billion from the March 2021 stimulus bill—about $3 billion. That would cover losses for awhile.

I also wrote as my final point that the sales tax revenue projections for Measures R and M are built to assume recessions happening, i.e., only allocating half of projected revenues. The Great Recession did not affect the availability of funding for Measure R projects (Purple Line, Gold Line to Azusa, Expo to Santa Monica, Regional Connector and Crenshaw Line) despite the fact that the Great Recession had a far greater impact on sales tax revenues and there were no federal bailouts of transit agencies during the Great Recession.

Last edited by numble; Yesterday at 6:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:19 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.