^I think it's structurally very similar to Towers 1 & 7. There's a thick concrete core, with steel floors and outer columns (16, if I recall correctly).
Quote:
Originally Posted by thelanetrain17
^ the performing arts center (which i think is way out of place there but thats just me). Has there been any progress on this building.
|
Last I read, it was being put off because the site it current occupies is being used for the PATH station. They're not really going to do anything with it until the transit hub is done in the next year or so. I think Frank Gehry is no longer associated with it (thank God) since he apparently bailed when things went low-key.
^I think it's structurally very similar to Towers 1 & 7. There's a thick concrete core, with steel floors and outer columns (16, if I recall correctly).
Quote:
Originally Posted by thelanetrain17
^ the performing arts center (which i think is way out of place there but thats just me). Has there been any progress on this building.
|
Last I read, it was being put off because the site it current occupies is being used for the PATH station. They're not really going to do anything with it until the transit hub is done in the next year or so. I think Frank Gehry is no longer associated with it (thank God) since he apparently bailed when things went low-key. There's still fundraising for it. I honestly think the site is better off without it. The World Trade Center was never a center of high art (aside from the roving artist community that was allowed to essentially squat in unrented floors). The WTC was a pop art icon, and home to giant corporate art pieces, if you want high culture, the WFC winter garden does things from time to time. I think the location is better suited as either more retail and low-midrise office space, or some open space that isn't a living graveyard, as the one across the street is never going to be appropriate for fun. Though tourists will probably improperly ham it up like they do today.