HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Suburbs


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #41  
Old Posted May 24, 2016, 3:03 PM
Arcologist Arcologist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: The Nation's Capital
Posts: 687
NIMBYism at its best!

I actually really like this proposal, and believe it would certainly spruce up that end of Teron. As it stands now, it's just scrub brush and hydro lines...

9-storeys would create a great "gateway" building for Teron, similar to the 12-storey Kanata Atriums building at the other end of Teron.

Anyways, sad that a community association has that much power, especially when they generally represent the views of fewer than 10% of residents (the active NIMBYist type!)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #42  
Old Posted May 24, 2016, 3:05 PM
Arcologist Arcologist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: The Nation's Capital
Posts: 687
Asking price is now $2.5M
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2019, 6:29 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is online now
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 12,287
Resubmission... Goodbye fancy park. Hello huge parking lot!


Development application:
http://app01.ottawa.ca/postingplans/...appId=__BOFGZD

Architect: NEUF Architects


The property owner is proposing to develop the subject lands with two (2) buildings: a three (3) storey low-rise apartment building in the southern corner of the subject lands, and a nine (9) storey mid-rise, mixed-use apartment building with ground floor commercial uses. The subject lands will be developed in two (2) phases, as follows:

Phase 1: 1131 Teron Road







Phase 1 involves the demolition of the existing one (1) storey dwelling and the development of a three (3) storey apartment building containing 30 dwelling units on the rectangular parcel known municipally as 1131 Teron Road.

A temporary surface parking lot containing 36 parking spaces will be located slightly to the north of the proposed three (3) storey building, on the parcel known as 1151 Teron Road. The proposed parking satisfies the Zoning By-law’s minimum resident and visitor parking rate provisions for Phase I of the proposed development. The proposed development will also include six (6) visitor parking spaces, all of which will be located to the north of the building, in close proximity to its entrances. All parking for the proposed development will be accessed via an access road connecting the subject lands to Teron Road and March Road.

Bicycle parking and communal amenity areas are proposed to be located at the rear of the proposed low-rise apartment building.


Phase 2: 1151 Teron Road





Phase 2 will involve the development of the parcel known as 1151 Teron Road with a nine (9) storey, mid-rise, mixed-use building with ground floor commercial uses and apartment dwelling units on the upper floors. The total Gross Floor Area of the ground floor commercial uses is proposed to be approximately 904 square metres; while 109 dwelling units are proposed.

Parking for the proposed development will be provided in the form of an underground parking garage with 46 spaces and a surface parking lot between the proposed building and March Road to the northeast; in total, 229 parking spaces will be provided on the subject lands. 36 of the outdoor parking spaces will be reserved for residents of the low-rise apartment building developed at 1131 Teron Road as part of Phase 1. The surface parking lot is largely located under the existing hydro corridor, which significantly limits the buildable envelope of the subject lands. The parking lot includes opportunities for internal and perimeter landscaping to screen the parking area.

A loading/delivery zone is located at the western edge of the proposed building and will serve all of the ground floor commercial units.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #44  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2019, 8:28 PM
SkeggsEggs SkeggsEggs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 359
Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketphish View Post
Resubmission... Goodbye fancy park. Hello huge parking lot!
Lmao, a true NIMBY success story!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #45  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2019, 8:19 PM
Arcologist Arcologist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: The Nation's Capital
Posts: 687
How is this better than what was proposed before?!?

Man this city has a real problem...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #46  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2019, 8:26 PM
Multi-modal Multi-modal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,138
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcologist View Post
How is this better than what was proposed before?!?

Man this city has a real problem...
This is one reason why NIMBYs fight this stuff - its always proposed by Developer A with a beautiful common space / park and beautiful architecture so it will get approved, then Developer A makes a profit by flipping the approved development to Developer B. Developer B removes everything that made the development nice to maximize profit. Voila!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #47  
Old Posted Oct 8, 2020, 3:50 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 23,983
Approved. architecture looks decent, but that parking lot! The City needs to start restricting surface parking.

Quote:
Kate Porter
@KatePorterCBC


At planning committee today, councillors OK'd a nine-storey residential building at Teron and March roads in #Kanata. (Nine storeys were already allowed there)



9:58 AM · Oct 8, 2020·Twitter Web App
https://twitter.com/KatePorterCBC/st...03555830681600
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2021, 7:00 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
1131-1151 Teron Road was purchased
by 2772133 Ontario Inc. (Manor Park
Management Inc.) from 11021028
Canada Inc. and 11073656 Canada Inc.
for $3,925,000 or $24.60 per square
foot. It is zone Residential Fifth Density
and Parks and Open Space.

http://www.juteaujohnsoncomba.com/ne...mber-Sales.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #49  
Old Posted May 22, 2021, 3:01 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is online now
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 12,287
Manor Park Management is proposing to develop the subject lands with two (2) residential buildings: a nine (9) storey, mid-rise apartment building on the larger, triangle-shaped parcel known as 1151 Teron Road and a three (3) storey low-rise apartment building on the smaller, rectangle parcel known as 1131 Teron Road. A total of 134 dwelling units are proposed, divided as follows:

The nine (9) storey apartment building will contain 116 dwelling units:
  • 28 one (1) bedroom units;
  • 40 one (1) bedroom + den units;
  • 36 two (2) bedroom units;
  • 11 two (2) bedroom + den units; and,
  • One (1) three (3) bedroom unit.

The three (3) storey apartment building will contain 18 dwelling units:
  • One (1) one (1) bedroom unit;
  • Seven (7) one (1) bedroom + den units;
  • Five (5) two (2) bedroom units; and,
  • Five (5) two (2) bedroom + den units.

Full-movement vehicular access to both residential buildings will be provided via a driveway connection to Teron Road. Unlike the previous mixed-use version of the project, access to March Road is no longer contemplated. March Road access was mainly requested for the benefit of the at-grade commercial uses. As discussed in the Parsons Transportation Study, the Teron Road access is sufficient for the projected vehicle volumes and movements of the residential project.

Parking for the proposed development is proposed to be provided in the form of a mix of surface parking (99 spaces) within the area of the Hydro corridor adjacent to the proposed nine (9) storey building and an underground parking garage (100 spaces), accessible via a ramp adjacent to the three (3) storey building. A total of 199 parking spaces will be provided, 172 of which will be for residents and 27 of which will be for visitors.

The underground parking garage will also provide secure bicycle parking spaces for the proposed development’s residents. Additional bicycle parking spaces will be located outdoors, near the entrances to both buildings.

Additional, passive at-grade communal recreational space will be provided on the north portion of the subject lands between the parking lot and March Road, in the form of soft landscaping and a pathway connecting to an existing pedestrian pathway east of the subject lands.

The following is a summary of the most significant revisions to the proposed development and associated plans:
  • The massing of the nine (9) storey building has been revised, simplified and scaled back along Teron Road and the previously-approved staggered floorplate sizes have been normalized for better unit layouts. The building steps back after the ground floor to the seventh storey, followed by a further step-back at the ninth storey. The nine (9) storey building continues to comply with the permitted building height measured in metres on Schedule 327 of the Zoning By-law, which establishes the permitted building form on the subject lands. The three (3) storey building is also in compliance with Schedule 327 of the Zoning By-law.
  • Ground floor commercial uses are no longer proposed as part of the nine (9) storey building. As a result, the proposed development will be exclusively residential, with at-grade, street-fronting units.
  • Vehicle access to and from March Road is no longer proposed. As a result, vehicular access to the proposed development will be exclusively via Teron Road. The March Road access was mainly requested for the benefit of the at-grade commercial uses.
  • The removal of previously proposed visitor spaces adjacent to the low-rise apartment building will result in a longer, uninterrupted driveway throat length.
  • From a timing perspective, the proposed development is to be built out in one (1) phase, whereas the subject lands were previously proposed to be developed in two (2) phases.
  • The previously proposed unit count was 139 total dwelling units, whereas the revised unit count will consist of 134 dwelling units, as a result of additional larger units.
  • Due to the slight reduction in dwelling units and the elimination of ground floor commercial uses, the required minimum vehicle parking is now much lower. Combined with a larger underground parking garage than was previously proposed, the proposed surface parking will be reduced from 183 spaces to 99 spaces. The reduction of surface parking allows for more landscaped areas along March Road.
  • The ramp to the parking garage is proposed to be located to the rear of the low-rise building at 1131 Teron Road, whereas it was previously proposed to be located at the base of the mid-rise building at 1151 Teron Road. The revised ramp location contributes to a more efficient below-grade parking layout.


Architect: Project1 Studio


Development application:
https://devapps.ottawa.ca/en/applica...9-0187/details

Siteplan:




Renderings:














Last edited by rocketphish; May 22, 2021 at 4:05 PM. Reason: Added summary of revisions
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #50  
Old Posted May 22, 2021, 3:02 AM
Harley613's Avatar
Harley613 Harley613 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Aylmer, QC
Posts: 6,660
Is there a charcoal brick factory in Ottawa with a permanent 2 for 1 sale or something?!
__________________
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/the.harleydavis/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51  
Old Posted May 22, 2021, 11:51 AM
Proof Sheet Proof Sheet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,860
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harley613 View Post
Is there a charcoal brick factory in Ottawa with a permanent 2 for 1 sale or something?!
The architect in question likes charcoal brick I believe. It isn't designed by the architect that this forum loves to hate.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #52  
Old Posted May 22, 2021, 12:18 PM
Marshsparrow Marshsparrow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,038
This is a really awkward piece of real estate - I don't mind it... however, cue the Beaverbrook pitchfork gang, they're known to resist anything...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #53  
Old Posted May 22, 2021, 8:52 PM
Norman Bates Norman Bates is offline
Living With My Mother
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 985
Bonus points for including the hydro towers and lines in the illustrations.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #54  
Old Posted May 23, 2021, 12:03 AM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 23,983
Looks decent. Pop of colour. Again with the surface parking. Should be banned or taxed profusely.

I don't get the obsession with black and/or charcoal brick. We should be doing what we can to reduce the heat island effect, not raise it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #55  
Old Posted May 23, 2021, 11:44 PM
roger1818's Avatar
roger1818 roger1818 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Stittsville, ON
Posts: 6,510
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
Approved. architecture looks decent, but that parking lot! The City needs to start restricting surface parking.


https://twitter.com/KatePorterCBC/st...03555830681600
It isn't clear in the rendering you posted (though the newer ones show them), but that parking lot is under high tension power lines. I don't think they can build anything under those, so about the only other option would be greenspace.

I am very familiar with that area as I lived very near there during one of my co-op work terms in a previous life, and would walk across that field to my work at BNR's Kanata facility on what was called Richardson Side Rd. at the time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #56  
Old Posted May 25, 2021, 12:30 AM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 23,983
I guess that helps digesting the parking situation. Thanks!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #57  
Old Posted May 25, 2021, 2:32 PM
roger1818's Avatar
roger1818 roger1818 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Stittsville, ON
Posts: 6,510
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
I guess that helps digesting the parking situation. Thanks!
It would be nice if they put in underground parking and then had a park on the surface, but that would be very expensive and it would still act as a barrier for ground water infiltration (though some of the water would be absorbed by the thin layer of earth).

Overall it looks like a good use for a difficult piece of property to develop. I am glad they have removed the entrance on March Rd. that was originally planned (even if it was right in, right out) as its best to minimize intersections on major arterials (keep your roads as roads and your streets as streets and stop making stroads).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #58  
Old Posted May 25, 2021, 3:13 PM
TransitZilla TransitZilla is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,737
This project is a good example of why I think it makes no sense that the Kanata North Transitway is planned to use March Rd to bypass Beaverbrook.

Teron Rd is where the residents are, and there is more potential for midrise infill like this one. That's where the transit should continue to be. I think there are opportunities for transit priority along the Teron Rd corridor, and the city should be exploring those.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #59  
Old Posted May 25, 2021, 9:31 PM
roger1818's Avatar
roger1818 roger1818 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Stittsville, ON
Posts: 6,510
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradnixon View Post
This project is a good example of why I think it makes no sense that the Kanata North Transitway is planned to use March Rd to bypass Beaverbrook.

Teron Rd is where the residents are, and there is more potential for midrise infill like this one. That's where the transit should continue to be. I think there are opportunities for transit priority along the Teron Rd corridor, and the city should be exploring those.
Probably the wrong thread to discuss this, but while I see where you are coming from, I am not convinced. Having the busway on Teron would slow down the buses going to South March (which includes the Kanata North Business Park) with all the extra stops that would result.

Besides, Beaverbrook is a post war, 20th century, car dependant suburb. The only density on it currently is within a short walk of the proposed, stage 3 Eagleson station and this new development will be near the intersection of Teron and March Rd, which presumably will have a busway station.

By all means have buses run along Teron, but I don't see the benefit of relocating the busway to it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #60  
Old Posted Sep 25, 2022, 4:43 PM
SL123 SL123 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,363
The site is being excavated right now
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Suburbs
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:30 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.