Quote:
Originally Posted by GUB
Nailed it! That and the opening up (ice breaking) of the St. Lawrence Seaway diverting SJ bound ships to Montreal (another Fed screw job). Although I've heard there are grand plans for Port SJ...
|
This is untrue.
a) The St Lawrence Seaway allowed ocean-going vessels onto the Great Lakes. The work undertaken had no effect whatsoever on the part of the St Lawrence below Montreal. It opened Toronto up to a huge freight increase which never actually arrived as containerization allowed cargo to be shipped by rail and truck from Montreal, Saint John or anywhere else further east.
The introduction of ice-breaking was an important milestone but it coincided with a much, much bigger change in the entire global shipping industry.
b) Halifax is conveniently left out discussions of Port SJ decline. While it's tempting to blame Central Canada for all our problems, Halifax has far, far outpaced Saint John throughout every single period of Canadian history. As surface transportation links improve, the efficiency of transporting cargo a few hundred kilometres more by ship declines, by definition. The twinning of Route 2 throughout the province did more to hurt Port SJ than any aquatic improvements on the St Lawrence.
c) The one and only "Fed Screwjob" favouring Ontario and Quebec over the Maritimes was Confederation. One of the great promises of creating a united Dominion was that of slowly taking control of Rupert's Land and eventually everything north of the 49th. This was never really in the cards for the Atlantic Provinces. Confederation had probably more benefits than harms, but this harm was totally underestimated until way too late. It was inevitable, but hardly predictable, that sovereignty and protectionism would lead Ottawa to heavily restrict NB's once-blooming trade with New England.