HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #421  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2016, 10:35 PM
Nouvellecosse's Avatar
Nouvellecosse Nouvellecosse is offline
Volatile Pacivist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 9,070
Isn't BB referring to the power lines in the pictures of the station? Those aren't train catenary lines.
__________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." - George Bernard Shaw
Don't ask people not to debate a topic. Just stop making debatable assertions. Problem solved.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #422  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2016, 10:48 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,368
Good heavens, I'm talking about the utility lines not the OCS.

@Nouvellecosse, that G.B.Shaw quote has been a lifelong favorite.
__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #423  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2016, 10:51 PM
plutonicpanda plutonicpanda is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 623
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee View Post
That would look all the more better without the third world overhead lines everywhere.
I completely agree. I can't stand overhead wires along streets. I know the huge ones are necessary to be above ground, but the smaller ones that litter our cities should be buried.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #424  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2016, 5:49 PM
scalziand's Avatar
scalziand scalziand is offline
Mortaaaaaaaaar!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Naugatuck, CT/Worcester,MA
Posts: 3,506
Connecticut DOT Warns Reduction Of Budget Could Mean Deep Cuts In Services
Don Stacom

Connecticut is facing a projected deficit of more than $1.4 billion for 2017-18, and all state agencies are giving Gov. Dannel P. Malloy projections of what would happen if they face substantial cuts in 2017-18 and 2018-19.

As part of that exercise, the DOT earlier this month reported on what it would do if it gets 10 percent less next year — and a frozen budget the following year.

Private snowplow contractors would no longer be hired in big storms, Shore Line East would lose half its service, the Waterbury and Danbury branch lines of Metro-North Railroad would shut down on weekends and night, CT Transit bus schedules would be chopped back and the new Hartford Line commuter rail service wouldn't start until 2019, the DOT said.

Its full report is at http://tinyurl.com/jdxduvt.

http://www.courant.com/news/connecti...225-story.html

Funny how a 10% cut in funding would result in a far greater than 10% cut in service...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #425  
Old Posted Jan 1, 2017, 11:16 PM
Nexis4Jersey's Avatar
Nexis4Jersey Nexis4Jersey is offline
Greetings from New Jersey
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 3,278
Some photos I took at Jamaica Station the other day













Reply With Quote
     
     
  #426  
Old Posted Jan 2, 2017, 12:06 AM
CastleScott CastleScott is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sacramento Ca/formerly CastleRock Co
Posts: 1,055
^ Great pics and as a railfan I always enjoy your posts on here. That Jamaica station is really cool-kinda like something out of Star Wars.

Oh btw here in California CalTrans has bought several coaches from NJ Transit and has been renovating them for service on the regional Amtrak California routes.

Last edited by CastleScott; Jan 2, 2017 at 9:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #427  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2017, 6:45 PM
scalziand's Avatar
scalziand scalziand is offline
Mortaaaaaaaaar!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Naugatuck, CT/Worcester,MA
Posts: 3,506
This is for the Waterbury line:

Pitched bills would expand rail service

http://www.rep-am.com/news/news-loca...-rail-service/

The bills in question behind the paywall are SB 301 and SB 384.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #428  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2017, 12:50 AM
Dac150's Avatar
Dac150 Dac150 is offline
World Machine
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NY/CT
Posts: 6,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by scalziand View Post
This is for the Waterbury line:

Pitched bills would expand rail service

http://www.rep-am.com/news/news-loca...-rail-service/

The bills in question behind the paywall are SB 301 and SB 384.
I wish a lawmaker would stand up for the Danbury Branch … it should really be electrified. I know there are 'plans' for that to eventually happen, but I've heard nothing lately but crickets.
__________________
"I'm going there, but I like it here wherever it is.."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #429  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2017, 1:51 AM
Crawford Crawford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 30,757
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dac150 View Post
I wish a lawmaker would stand up for the Danbury Branch … it should really be electrified. I know there are 'plans' for that to eventually happen, but I've heard nothing lately but crickets.
Yes, both the Danbury and Waterbury lines need serious upgrading. And Danbury definitely needs to be electrified. There's also a proposal to extend the line north to New Milford, Kent, and up to the Mass state line.

Lawmakers push to electrify, expand Danbury train line

http://www.newstimes.com/local/artic...#photo-7513212
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #430  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2017, 4:11 AM
scalziand's Avatar
scalziand scalziand is offline
Mortaaaaaaaaar!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Naugatuck, CT/Worcester,MA
Posts: 3,506
There's no point electrifying anything until the branches have been fully double tracked.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #431  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2017, 8:44 AM
mrsmartman's Avatar
mrsmartman mrsmartman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 502
Documenting Penn Station’s Departure Board Demolition

Quote:
Originally Posted by michelle young
Gregory Grice, a photographer for Untapped Cities, documented the demolition of Penn Station’s Amtrak departure board last week over the course of four evenings. Although this sign didn’t have the flapping sound of the Solari board that it replaced in 2000, it nonetheless had a rather lo-fi analog look which instantly became an object of nostalgia once the removal was announced. The sign has been replaced by smaller digital LCD screens.


Source: http://untappedcities.com/2017/01/30...rd-demolition/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #432  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2017, 8:51 AM
mrsmartman's Avatar
mrsmartman mrsmartman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 502
New Passenger Information Displays Improve Customer Experience at Penn Station New York

Upgrades improve ADA access, help relieve concourse congestion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig Schulz
NEW YORK – Amtrak is making a major upgrade to the busiest transit hub in America with the launch of a new, state-of-the-art Passenger Information Display System (PIDS) at Penn Station New York. The new PIDS communicates train status, origin and destination stations, boarding gate and other information and features bright, new LCD displays which are easier to read and synchronize audio and visual messaging in the station.

Strategic placement of the new displays, along with modification and eventual removal of some existing monitors – including the large train status board in the center of the concourse – provides customers access to the same information in various locations, allowing more efficient use of space in the main hall.


Source: http://media.amtrak.com/2016/10/new-...tion-new-york/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #433  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2017, 1:22 AM
Dac150's Avatar
Dac150 Dac150 is offline
World Machine
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NY/CT
Posts: 6,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by scalziand View Post
There's no point electrifying anything until the branches have been fully double tracked.
While I agree that would be ideal, if they can manage a single electrified track on the New Cannan line, they can manage on both the Danbury and Waterbury branches. I can't speak for the Waterbury branch, but I know the Danbury branch very well and attaining the land which would be required for two tracks would be very challenging.
__________________
"I'm going there, but I like it here wherever it is.."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #434  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2017, 9:19 PM
Nexis4Jersey's Avatar
Nexis4Jersey Nexis4Jersey is offline
Greetings from New Jersey
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 3,278
'All By Myself' LIRR Commuter's Video

Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #435  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2017, 7:45 PM
Nexis4Jersey's Avatar
Nexis4Jersey Nexis4Jersey is offline
Greetings from New Jersey
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 3,278
Andover Twp. decision could get Lackawanna Cutoff station on track

http://www.njherald.com/20170302/and...tion-on-track#
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #436  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2017, 11:58 PM
Nexis4Jersey's Avatar
Nexis4Jersey Nexis4Jersey is offline
Greetings from New Jersey
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 3,278
Commuters Want Repairs At Lynbrook Train Station

Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #437  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2017, 6:55 AM
mrsmartman's Avatar
mrsmartman mrsmartman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 502
Grand Central Terminal is underutilized without Amtrak.

Why do Metro-North trains at Grand Central arrive so much earlier for boarding versus the LIRR trains at Penn Station?

Answer: https://www.quora.com/Why-do-Metro-N...t-Penn-Station



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #438  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2017, 1:33 PM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,236
GCT at saturation with MNRR traffic at rush now. The switch plant and park ave tunnel can't handle any more peak traffic. Even if Amtrak wanted back in MNRR would never let them since it would mean cutting trains.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #439  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2017, 3:25 PM
Dac150's Avatar
Dac150 Dac150 is offline
World Machine
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NY/CT
Posts: 6,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrsmartman View Post
Grand Central Terminal is underutilized without Amtrak.

Why do Metro-North trains at Grand Central arrive so much earlier for boarding versus the LIRR trains at Penn Station?
As a MNRR commuter I love it … I'll often catch a little later train on the way back for the sole purpose of getting a good seat in the car I want.
__________________
"I'm going there, but I like it here wherever it is.."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #440  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2017, 4:58 PM
mrsmartman's Avatar
mrsmartman mrsmartman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 502
Quote:
Originally Posted by k1052 View Post
GCT at saturation with MNRR traffic at rush now. The switch plant and park ave tunnel can't handle any more peak traffic. Even if Amtrak wanted back in MNRR would never let them since it would mean cutting trains.
GCT is probably the only double level terminal in the world. The upper level of GCT was designed for intercity trains while the lower level was for commuter trains. How does MNRR allocate trains to the upper and lower levels? As there are more platforms than needed, does MNRR allocate trains to both levels evenly or to upper level first then lower level for convenience?

NY Penn seems to have more serious capacity issue than GCT. Would it be possible for some Amtrak trains running to GCT at non-peak hours?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:33 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.