Canada's Tallest U/C #11 - #30 - Page 397

isaidso · #**7921** Posted **Jun 14, 2017, 12:32 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper

Pomposity isn't a good trait when you act like an idiot.

If you weren't such an ignorant piece of trash I might actually be listen to your vitriol. All you do is hurl insults and talk down to every one around you. I feel sorry for anyone who has to see you on a regular basis. There's a reason I told you to halt all contact with me 6 times over the last 3 years.

As the mods let you say whatever you want it's left to me. For the 7th time:

REFRAIN FROM ALL CONTACT WITH ME

caltrane74 · #**7922** Posted **Jun 14, 2017, 12:39 AM**

Guy, I don't wanna sound stupid but, why don't you just block him?

dleung · #**7923** Posted **Jun 14, 2017, 2:02 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper

Most forumers dismiss these as Toronto threads and they would be right. They are right in part because they dismiss them as Toronto threads and don't post.

Also, a lot of the local forumers "proudly" avoid the Canadian section because of the homerism that pops up. Their loss.

Lol nice spin, but the practical rationale is that the Canada threads have been made to be very height-centric so Vancouver projects are disqualified from most of them, and towers like Kengo Kuma are buried amongst low-rise projects from Hamilton etc or more likely followed by "ok... So (insert timeless box from Toronto) is 155.4m or 154.5m!? Do we officially have 9363 towers over 155.2m?! "

WhipperSnapper · #**7924** Posted **Jun 14, 2017, 2:17 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by isaidso

If you weren't such an ignorant piece of trash I might actually be listen to your vitriol. All you do is hurl insults and talk down to every one around you. I feel sorry for anyone who has to see you on a regular basis. There's a reason I told you to halt all contact with me 6 times over the last 3 years.

As the mods let you say whatever you want it's left to me. For the 7th time:

REFRAIN FROM ALL CONTACT WITH ME

Shit. Are you ever deluded.

1. I respond in kind. Your posts are the most condescending on the forum.
2. For the umpteenth time, No! You quoted me with your idiotic duck analogy. I'm not supposed to respond to that?!?

Stop blaming the mods. It's you and all you.

WhipperSnapper · #**7925** Posted **Jun 14, 2017, 2:23 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by dleung

Lol nice spin, but the practical rationale is that the Canada threads have been made to be very height-centric so Vancouver projects are disqualified from most of them, and towers like Kengo Kuma are buried amongst low-rise projects from Hamilton etc or more likely followed by "ok... So (insert timeless box from Toronto) is 155.4m or 154.5m!? Do we officially have 9363 towers over 155.2m?! "

Spin? No, That's what you do. There's only three threads that place height over architecture and Vancouver has representation in 2 of them.

We also get more then enough post about your taste in architecture and urban planning in the Canadian forum

caltrane74 · #**7926** Posted **Jun 15, 2017, 9:20 PM**

Things getting serious at Wellesley and the Park

194 meters

caltrane74 · #**7927** Posted **Jun 16, 2017, 12:54 AM**

Literally building a wall on Yonge Street

YC/198 meters

Look closely, street being cleared for another condo.

osirisboy · #**7928** Posted **Jun 16, 2017, 3:13 AM**

Finally young starts to clean up

dleung · #**7929** Posted **Jun 16, 2017, 4:31 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper

...There's only three threads that place height over architecture...

...Carrying the bulk of all traffic in the Canada section. How many active high rise threads place architecture over height? Zero lol. No one is avoiding the Canada forums like you suggest; participation is just proportional to the number of projects that can be shared where there is interest

koops65 · #**7930** Posted **Jun 16, 2017, 5:16 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by caltrane74

Look closely, street being cleared for another condo.

The Marriott on the left? Or Halo on the right?

Martin Mtl · #**7931** Posted **Jun 16, 2017, 5:54 PM**

I just noticed that the info for Tour des Canadiens 2 is left void on the first page. It will be 53 stories high and 168 meters.

WhipperSnapper · #**7932** Posted **Jun 16, 2017, 5:57 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by koops65

The Marriott on the left? Or Halo on the right?

Hint: replace "street" with "retail tenants"

WhipperSnapper · #**7933** Posted **Jun 16, 2017, 6:00 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Martin Mtl

I just noticed that the info for Tour des Canadiens 2 is left void on the first page. It will be 53 stories high and 168 meters.

I wonder if that includes mechanical, parapets, etc. That's more parking than I would have expected.

TorontoDrew · #**7934** Posted **Jun 16, 2017, 6:15 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Martin Mtl

I just noticed that the info for Tour des Canadiens 2 is left void on the first page. It will be 53 stories high and 168 meters.
[/IMG]

Will it have the team logo on top as well? I hope not.Also I alsways wonder why Maple Leaf Square never put a Leaf logo on top of one of their towers. The ACC is about to be completely hidden from view.