HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


    432 Park Avenue in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
New York Projects & Construction Forum

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2010, 2:06 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,747
Smile NEW YORK | 432 Park Avenue (Drake Hotel dev.) | (1,396) FT / 432 M | 89 FLOORS

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/busines...uOt1pnLp7MKbQI

Drake's new take
Macklowes, new partner buy out 10 investors


By LOIS WEISS
January 6, 2010

The fat lady hasn't yet sung for the former Drake Hotel site -- or the Macklowe family's plans to develop it.

Harry Macklowe and his son, William, appear to have come up with a way to keep control of the vacant Midtown lot on which the Drake Hotel used to sit and has since become an undeveloped eyesore and symbol of the Macklowes' financial troubles.

The Macklowes' development company, Macklowe Properties, is teaming up with Los Angeles-based private-equity firm CIM Group to pay off 10 debtholders who hold slices of a $510 million loan on the property as the family apparently looks to stage a bit of a New York City real estate comeback.

The agreement with CIM would enable the Macklowes to move forward with their development plans for the Drake site, which sits on Park Avenue between 56th and 57th streets and is where the Macklowes want to construct a 60-story, 600,000 square foot tower
.

Macklowe in 2006 spent more than $440 million buying the Drake Hotel, and has since torn it down.

Along the way he has also assembled a collection of adjacent properties and air rights along East 57th Street, creating what some have called an awkward front for a future development that was to include ground-level retail as well as an office tower.

Macklowe had trouble acquiring all of the buildings needed to create a space attractive for a major retailer such as Nordstrom, which at one point was in talks to open its first New York City store there.

Among many in real-estate circles, the Drake site is considered to be one of the city's most desirable locations, though these days it is little more than a vacant lot bounded by plywood walls.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.

Last edited by Dylan Leblanc; Feb 29, 2012 at 2:05 AM.
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2010, 2:33 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,747
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...749032584.html




WSJ slideshow

Quote:
If the Drake deal closes in two weeks as expected, CIM and Mr. Macklowe will own what may be the world's most valuable rubble-strewn lot, once the site of the Drake Hotel, which was built in 1926. Mr. Macklowe bought and then demolished the hotel in 2007, intending to build a major office tower atop a base of high-end stores.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2010, 3:01 PM
trvlr70 trvlr70 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: usa
Posts: 2,245
I hooked up with a Swissair flight attendant there a long time ago on a layover. Great memories. Sorry it's gone!
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2010, 3:41 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,747
Quote:
Originally Posted by trvlr70 View Post
I hooked up with a Swissair flight attendant there a long time ago on a layover. Great memories. Sorry it's gone!
You still have the memories...
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2012, 2:30 AM
Duck From NY's Avatar
Duck From NY Duck From NY is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Staten Island, "New York City"
Posts: 825
Quote:
Originally Posted by trvlr70 View Post
I hooked up with a Swissair flight attendant there a long time ago on a layover. Great memories. Sorry it's gone!
Yeah the Drake was definitely nice, but 432 will make up for it. And lol, was this back when flight attendants were stewardesses?
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2012, 1:55 PM
CoolCzech's Avatar
CoolCzech CoolCzech is offline
Frigidus Maximus
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,618
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duck From NY View Post
Yeah the Drake was definitely nice, but 432 will make up for it. And lol, was this back when flight attendants were stewardesses?
What do you think "flight attendants" are today, NASA flight engineers?
__________________
http://tinyurl.com/2acxb5t


I ❤️ NY
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Jun 3, 2012, 4:53 AM
Chicago103's Avatar
Chicago103 Chicago103 is offline
Future Mayor of Chicago
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,060
Why do all these contemporary buildings have such freaking low floor counts?! This is a flat roofed residential or mostly residential building taller than the World Trade Center (the old which had 110 floors), I mean this thing should have 110 floors easily. The John Hancock Center in Chicago has 100 floors and it is only partly residential and only 1,127 feet tall. Something just irks me about an all residential flat roofed building (no spire, etc.) only having 89 floors. Is this because luxury buildings these days demand super high ceilings that people didn't demand in the 1960's and 1970's or what?
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2012, 10:02 PM
JACKinBeantown's Avatar
JACKinBeantown JACKinBeantown is offline
JACKinBeantown
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 8,824
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoolCzech View Post
What do you think "flight attendants" are today, NASA flight engineers?
Thanks, trvlr70, Duckfrom NY and CoolCzech. I copied and sent your conversation to an old college buddy who actually is a NASA flight engineer. That's good dialogue.
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2010, 9:19 PM
Zerton's Avatar
Zerton Zerton is offline
Ω
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,551
They demolished THAT?!
__________________
If all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed, if all records told the same tale, then the lie passed into history and became truth. -Orwell
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2010, 2:18 AM
scalziand's Avatar
scalziand scalziand is offline
Mortaaaaaaaaar!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Naugatuck, CT/Worcester,MA
Posts: 3,506
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zerton View Post
They demolished THAT?!
Sadly, yes. I can't believe Macklowe is going to regain control of the site.
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2010, 5:05 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,747
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zerton View Post
They demolished THAT?!
LOL, you're late to the party.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2010, 5:13 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,747
Some demo photos from a few years ago...
















__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2010, 5:28 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,747
A NY Times article from a couple of months ago...
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/18/re...er=rss&emc=rss

Drake Hotel’s Prime Space Remains Undeveloped


An opening in the fence allows a view of the lot where the Drake Hotel once stood on Park Avenue at 56th Street.


Louis Verde, of Turnbull & Asser, said: "We're not going anywhere."


By TERRY PRISTIN
November 17, 2009


Enclosed by a dark brown fence, the weedy lot at Park Avenue and 56th Street in Midtown Manhattan is a conspicuous reminder of how ambitions were shattered in the recent real estate debacle. This vacant site, where the Drake Hotel once stood, is likely to leave a gash in the middle of the nation’s costliest office submarket for years to come, real estate specialists say.

Manhattan has 79 other stalled construction sites but probably none to rival the Drake in location. “It is inarguably the best development site in the country and possibly the world,” said Woody Heller, an executive managing director at Studley, a real estate brokerage company. Just north of the site is 450 Park Avenue, an office building that traded in 2007 for a record price of $1,566 a square foot.

In 2006, the New York developer Harry Macklowe bought the elegant Drake Hotel, opened in 1926, for $418 million, or about $847,000 a room. He tore it down the next year and planned to replace it with a 550,000-square-foot L-shaped building with luxury condominiums, an even more elegant hotel and Manhattan’s first Nordstrom store.


The cost of acquiring additional properties to assemble the site increased the project’s cost to at least $724 million, or about $1,300 a square foot before construction, brokers said. They say it is difficult to gauge its current value because the market in Manhattan has fallen so far, and few transactions have occurred.

To shore up his position in the deal, Mr. Macklowe made a huge personal investment in the project by paying off $156.3 million in certain loans in October 2007, which raised his stake in the project to $250 million. In court papers, Mr. Macklowe and his son, William, now the chief executive of the family business, said they invested their personal assets in the Drake site because of repeated assurances from Deutsche Bank that the bank would refinance their loans when they matured in November 2007. But the loans were not refinanced, and the Macklowes defaulted.

Not long afterward, the Macklowes lost a major portion of their real estate empire. Without a fight, they gave up control of seven Midtown office buildings that they had acquired at the peak of the boom, and a few months later, they sold their prized General Motors Building, on Fifth Avenue at 59th Street.

But the Macklowes are tenaciously clinging to the Drake project and have told people they are determined to see it developed, most likely with a financial partner, even if they have to wait for years. Several brokers said the continuing involvement of Mr. Macklowe, who is considered highly creative but also litigious and a tough negotiator, adds a layer of complications.

In August 2008, Mr. Macklowe’s longtime lender, Deutsche Bank, sued to foreclose on loans for the hotel site and for nearby properties. Mr. Macklowe bought unused development rights, known as air rights, to eight townhouses on 57th Street to be able to add height to the building. He also sought to buy the townhouses themselves to give Nordstrom frontage on 57th Street opposite the Four Seasons Hotel but was only partly successful.

Mr. Macklowe paid a record average price of $520 a square foot for the air rights, according to a case study by two recent graduate students at Columbia, Travis B. Olsen and Evan Woolley.

If the Macklowes’ construction plans were complex, the financing was even more convoluted. Deutsche Bank sliced the $559 million Drake loan into 21 separate pieces, each with a different level of risk. The bank kept about $12 million of the loan and sold the rest to eight investment groups, earning tens of millions of dollars in fees.

Citing a lawsuit, the Macklowes declined to comment publicly on the Drake. But in court documents, they accused the bank of lying to them and betraying their trust “by making false promises it never intended to keep.” Sounding like a jilted lover, they said the bank “strung Macklowe Properties along until Deutsche Bank got what it wanted, then refused to honor its commitments — benefiting handsomely from its willfully dishonest, deceptive, bad faith and fraudulent conduct at Macklowe Properties’ expense.”

If the bank succeeds in foreclosing, the Macklowes’ investment “will almost certainly be a total loss,” they said. Deutsche Bank did not respond to requests for comment.

Despite the foreclosure suit, the Macklowes hold some cards, brokers say. In April 2007, they agreed to pay $47.5 million for a townhouse at 46 East 57th Street, where the luxury jeweler Buccellati is a tenant. The sale has not closed. If it does, it is possible that the Macklowes may successfully argue that this building — and others — are not part of the loan collateral, thus ensuring a role for themselves, according to real estate executives familiar with the Drake site.

In addition to leaving a big hole on Park Avenue, the stymied development has also had repercussions for a fancy shopping strip around the corner from the site that was intended to be included in the Macklowe project.

The town houses are still standing, but several of the storefronts are vacant. At 44 East 57th Street, which was the home for 60 years of Dalva Brothers, a store that specialized in 18th-century furniture, a cracked window is patched with duct tape and cardboard boxes are piled up inside. The Macklowes paid Dalva $2.2 million to move uptown. They also paid $19.2 million to buy the lease of the Swiss watchmaker Audemars Piguet at 40 East 57th Street and move the store to the north side of 57th Street.

But the Macklowes did not succeed in putting all the parts together. Nordstrom, which had signed a letter of intent to build a store with 253,500 square feet, backed out after the Macklowes failed to acquire all the buildings needed to create the 57th Street entrance.


One holdout is Turnbull & Asser, a men’s clothing store where shirts start at $275. It had been in contract to collect $33 million for moving from 42 East 57th Street to another town house, according a document prepared by Cushman & Wakefield. But in May 2008, the owner of Turnbull & Asser, Ali al-Fayed, exercised his option to buy the building from the previous owner for $31.5 million. Now, said Louis Verde, the manager, “we’re not going anywhere.”

Another holdout is Jacob the Jeweler at 50 East 57th Street, which reportedly demanded $100 million to move. The company had no comment.

Last year, iStar Financial, a real estate investment trust in New York that holds the largest chunk of the senior debt on the Drake, tried to sell its $224 million note at a discount. When the bids came in well below the $160 million asking price, iStar took it off the market.

But Jeffrey W. Baker, an executive managing director at Savills, a mortgage brokerage, said prospects for such deals were improving. Several of his overseas clients have shown interest in acquiring the Drake loan with the intention of gaining control of the property, he said.

“While the complexities and risks of the deal have reduced the number of potential buyers significantly,” Mr. Baker said, “the growing consensus overseas is that market conditions are near bottom and that now is the time to acquire trophy U.S. assets at bargain prices.”
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2013, 12:40 AM
deepen915 deepen915 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Sayreville, NJ
Posts: 217
Got my first up close look today while driving through the city! looks great!


432 Park Ave by deepen03, on Flickr

Taken using a Galaxy S4
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2013, 5:26 AM
N830MH N830MH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,967
Quote:
Originally Posted by deepen915 View Post
Got my first up close look today while driving through the city! looks great!


432 Park Ave by deepen03, on Flickr

Taken using a Galaxy S4
Wow! Looks great! Can't wait to be done. Looking forward to it. Thank you for sharing the pictures. I appreciate that.
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2010, 3:01 AM
Aleks's Avatar
Aleks Aleks is offline
cookies, skittles & milk
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 6,257
wasn't there a movie filmed in this building a couple years ago?

sab
__________________
...the greatness of victor is equally proportionate to the skill and obduracy of foe...
-Kostof-
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2010, 5:59 AM
Dac150's Avatar
Dac150 Dac150 is offline
World Machine
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NY/CT
Posts: 6,749
This is a mess that I’d like to see be fixed sooner rather than later. I’m not so much bummed out about losing the Drake as I am there just being an empty lot along Park Avenue. Hopefully with some help from the from the private equity firm, Harry can get himself together and get to work.

On a side note: Impressive figures on 450 Park, even if they are a few years old. Didn’t realize it was such a ‘hot’ tower considering it looks empty as a shell every time I walk past it.
__________________
"I'm going there, but I like it here wherever it is.."
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2010, 10:51 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,747
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dac150 View Post
This is a mess that I’d like to see be fixed sooner rather than later. I’m not so much bummed out about losing the Drake as I am there just being an empty lot along Park Avenue. Hopefully with some help from the from the private equity firm, Harry can get himself together and get to work.
My guess is that we're now talking a strictly residential tower. No way they're going to get 60 floors of office space in a tower of only 600,000 sq ft...

Quote:
The agreement with CIM would enable the Macklowes to move forward with their development plans for the Drake site, which sits on Park Avenue between 56th and 57th streets and is where the Macklowes want to construct a 60-story, 600,000 square foot tower.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2010, 11:04 PM
Dac150's Avatar
Dac150 Dac150 is offline
World Machine
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NY/CT
Posts: 6,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYguy View Post
My guess is that we're now talking a strictly residential tower. No way they're going to get 60 floors of office space in a tower of only 600,000 sq ft...
Agreed.
__________________
"I'm going there, but I like it here wherever it is.."
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2010, 10:55 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,747
According to curbed.com, looks like Macklowe has lost the site. More on that later...
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:55 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.