Quote:
Originally Posted by darkharbour
I do wonder how all of this will impact the movement of people around the city, isn't the only way in and out for trains to go through the level crossing at Simms Corner? Surely there will be some vocal opposition if trains start to travel that much more frequently through that already-contentious intersection.
|
There are multiple solutions for that. Previous suggested solutions have all been tossed because people prefer to work with what exists. Not even a traffic circle made the cut even though there is scads of space for it. Traffic lights could have been incorporated a long time ago but weren't. Look at it overhead and it is a simple four corner intersection.
I don't think a double track is going to change much. It will mean a few more trains each day. It's not going to be endless trains back and forth. There are larger cities that have entire yards in urban congestion and they work fine. When and if the time does come, I think it might be lowering the tracks below grade, raising the road slightly, and installing a bridge/s. But it will mean a more permanent configuration for that intersection, since further changes will be that much more complicated afterwards.
It's fully ensconced in both the "we'll cross that bridge when we get to it" and "you'll never satisfy everybody" categories.