HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Midwest


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2321  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 1:06 PM
Skyguy_7 Skyguy_7 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,657
The Wall Street Journal is reporting that Amazon HQ2 is going to New York and Virginia. It will be split evenly between Long Island City in Queens and Crystal City in northern Va. Sad, but a wise decision to stay away from our shithole state.

There was mention, however, that Amazon is looking to build "major sites" in several other cities. So everybody gets a trophy.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2322  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 1:24 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,883
Funny. I was thinking for awhile "what if Amazon offered a few of the runner ups small but still significant offices or expansions." Maybe 500 or a thousand or two. Not as many as 25,000 or 50,000 but even a few thousand would be cool for any city. Less in the way of tax breaks too.

Kind of curious to see if this would happen to anybody.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2323  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 1:46 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,350
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyguy_7 View Post
Sad, but a wise decision to stay away from our shithole state.
Alright Bruce, because New York state is the poster child of fiscal health? Get real.
__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2324  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 1:53 PM
BuildThemTaller BuildThemTaller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Long Island City, NY
Posts: 1,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyguy_7 View Post
The Wall Street Journal is reporting that Amazon HQ2 is going to New York and Virginia. It will be split evenly between Long Island City in Queens and Crystal City in northern Va. Sad, but a wise decision to stay away from our shithole state.

There was mention, however, that Amazon is looking to build "major sites" in several other cities. So everybody gets a trophy.
Amazon has had offices in Chicago for a while. I have a friend that works for them in the Loop, in the CME building. They handle logistics, mostly. It would not be surprising to see a larger footprint in the city in the near future. Most companies are moving away from a central headquarters to a more distributed footprint. This HQ2 thing was always about extracting the maximum amount of tax giveaways to accomplish that feat. Chicago played the game, along with 19 other communities.

The thing that really determines growth for the city will be its entrepreneurial class. What kind of investment money is flowing into the city and how many startups can take advantage of that? They will employ far more than a single corporate relocation. That, and poaching corporate headquarters from the suburbs. Hey AllState, the kids want to work downtown!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2325  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 3:33 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,375
I put my money on NY and Virginia not getting anywhere near 25,000 jobs each when all is up and running.

This will end up being a giant scam
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2326  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 3:54 PM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by BuildThemTaller View Post
Amazon has had offices in Chicago for a while. I have a friend that works for them in the Loop, in the CME building. They handle logistics, mostly. It would not be surprising to see a larger footprint in the city in the near future. Most companies are moving away from a central headquarters to a more distributed footprint. This HQ2 thing was always about extracting the maximum amount of tax giveaways to accomplish that feat. Chicago played the game, along with 19 other communities.

The thing that really determines growth for the city will be its entrepreneurial class. What kind of investment money is flowing into the city and how many startups can take advantage of that? They will employ far more than a single corporate relocation. That, and poaching corporate headquarters from the suburbs. Hey AllState, the kids want to work downtown!
WRT corporate relocations I think there is a case to be made for Chicago to not chase stuff like this and instead court legacy companies (banking, insurance, healthcare, retail, etc) who are still in the burbs or stuck in other cities with escalating cost and recruitment issues.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2327  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 4:03 PM
tjp tjp is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 429
Hopefully we can get one of their ‘lil offices. Them making a second visit to Chicago bodes well to that, I hope.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee View Post
Alright Bruce, because New York state is the poster child of fiscal health? Get real.
Well no - but Illinois is in a different league all-together. The state is rated BBB- by S&P, for God’s sake.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2328  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 4:36 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,883
Nashville is also getting an operations center for 5000 workers. This isn't a tech hub but rather to oversee distribution, supply chain management, etc. Still..great for them.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2329  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 5:36 PM
Kenmore Kenmore is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Uptown
Posts: 641
amazon news isn't unexpected but it's still GREAT to hear, major win for chicago
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2330  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 6:22 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,365
^ I agree, the generous offers from cities/states were premised on them landing the whole enchilada. If Amazon comes back to Chicago with a smaller proposal, they shouldn’t get one dollar of incentives. If they really see value in spreading their operations among many cities in different regions of the US, then they need Chicago more than we need them...

Also this does not bode well for Lincoln Yards. With direct Red Line access, The 78 might be able to squeak by like Lakeshore East and Central Station did, by downscaling or eliminating the office component and creating a unique, compelling residential neighborhood where people will want to live. At Lincoln Yards, though, Amazon was the only force with a chance of holding back the NIMBYs. I think we’ll continue to see expansion of the CBD into Fulton Market but not necessarily to other new areas.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2331  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 6:48 PM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,236
I'd suspect that Sterling Bay/JP Morgan has a plan B and plan C for Lincoln Yards.
The rest of the big developments feel more tentative.

I'm curious to see if the leasing logjam breaks now that Amazon has finally decided. Lots of big names looking for space.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2332  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 8:14 PM
emathias emathias is offline
Adoptive Chicagoan
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: River North, Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 5,157
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
...
One moment I remember at LGA was coming back home during Lollapalooza weekend Thursday evening. These girls were so excited that they got "group 2" boarding. Their reaction was priceless when they saw 3/4 of the plane board before. All business travelers.
...
I always get at least Group 2 on United because I hold their Visa, but it's become rather meaningless. I think it's odd they even bother to have more than three groups given how most of their flights actually get boarded. The only plus to always getting Group 2 is that it usually means that, even with all those business travelers going first, there's enough room for my carry-on.
__________________
[SIZE="1"]I like travel and photography - check out my [URL="https://www.flickr.com/photos/ericmathiasen/"]Flickr page[/URL].
CURRENT GEAR: Nikon Z6, Nikon Z 14-30mm f4 S, Nikon Z 24-70mm f/4 S, Nikon 50mm f1.4G
STOLEN GEAR: (during riots of 5/30/2020) Nikon D750, Nikon 14-24mm F2.8G, Nikon 85mm f1.8G, Nikon 50mm f1.4D
[/SIZE]
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2333  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 9:10 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by k1052 View Post
I'd suspect that Sterling Bay/JP Morgan has a plan B and plan C for Lincoln Yards.
The rest of the big developments feel more tentative.

I'm curious to see if the leasing logjam breaks now that Amazon has finally decided. Lots of big names looking for space.
Hmmm I don't know, I agree with emathias that "The 78" has the edge over Lincoln Yards right now, at least location-wise
__________________
Supercar Adventures is my YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4W...lUKB1w8ED5bV2Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2334  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 10:57 PM
JK47 JK47 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 365
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyguy_7 View Post
The Wall Street Journal is reporting that Amazon HQ2 is going to New York and Virginia. It will be split evenly between Long Island City in Queens and Crystal City in northern Va. Sad, but a wise decision to stay away from our shithole state.

There was mention, however, that Amazon is looking to build "major sites" in several other cities. So everybody gets a trophy.

The two largest offices for Amazon, outside of Seattle, are in the NYC and DC areas. They weren't going to choose Chicago...this was about extracting incentives for what is essentially an office expansion. It has nothing to do with taxes, regulations, bureaucracy, or whatever warped reason self-deprecating Illinoisans may dream up for why Chicago didn't get picked. There is no way in hell that Queens, of all places, is less corrupt, less regulated, and less complicated in terms of bureaucracy than Chicago.

As for shithole state...you must be confused since that's clearly Indiana (or Michigan which is resembles New York circa 1989). I'd say Ohio but that would be an insult to shitholes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2335  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 11:09 PM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
Hmmm I don't know, I agree with emathias that "The 78" has the edge over Lincoln Yards right now, at least location-wise
Not if you don’t have a huge anchor. You could start knocking chunks of LY off for residential tomorrow and do great if the approvals were in hand. Though I think they are still courting Amazon alternatives...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2336  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 11:23 PM
IrishIllini IrishIllini is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,175
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
Hmmm I don't know, I agree with emathias that "The 78" has the edge over Lincoln Yards right now, at least location-wise
Wasn't it ardecila that said the 78 had a better location? They're both two of my favorite posters, so I'm fine agreeing with either. I think Lincoln Yards and the north branch in general are well suited for robotics/AI labs and start-ups. I'm imagining a live-work district with showrooms for the public to check out emerging technology and buy stuff. That may slow or prevent the mega developments from taking hold. I don't see how these areas are attractive to major corporations without major infrastructure improvements. Even then it's hard to see how it competes with the 78 site. Interestingly enough, it's the same distance between Goose Island and Ogilvie as it is between the 78 and Ogilvie (1.4 mi). Union is a bit closer to the 78.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2337  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 11:35 PM
Tom In Chicago's Avatar
Tom In Chicago Tom In Chicago is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sick City
Posts: 7,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenmore View Post
amazon news isn't unexpected but it's still GREAT to hear, major win for chicago
I think by "major win" you really mean dodged a bullet. . .

. . .
__________________
Tom in Chicago
. . .
Near the day of Purification, there will be cobwebs spun back and forth in the sky.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2338  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 11:39 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,365
Quote:
Originally Posted by k1052 View Post
I'd suspect that Sterling Bay/JP Morgan has a plan B and plan C for Lincoln Yards.
The rest of the big developments feel more tentative.

I'm curious to see if the leasing logjam breaks now that Amazon has finally decided. Lots of big names looking for space.
I think Plan B and Plan C for these parcels was always going to be less intensive and more residential, I expect they will acquiesce in part to the aldermen's demands for more park space. Other components like the soccer stadium only made sense in the context of a massive infrastructure package, which in turn only made sense in the context of a huge anchor tenant. TBH the Finkl area and the big FFM site, given their relative lack of transit access, are better suited to low-rise multifamily and townhouse developments. We've seen almost no new supply of townhouses since the recession. Of course, that conflicts with the city's new zoning so expect that to be controversial.

Maybe the North Branch as a whole can continue to develop office at the south end where train stations are reasonably walkable. The "River District" on the Tribune site and the O'Donnell project just north of it can attract office, they are a reasonable walk from the Blue Line and can easily run shuttles around the congestion to Union/Ogilvie with only a minor new road connection through the Blommer Chocolate property.

On the other hand, the 78 has the best transit access out of the various megaprojects, with the Red Line tracks literally right on site. If the construction cost of a new station doesn't literally destroy the city's budget.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2339  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 11:49 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by emathias View Post
I always get at least Group 2 on United because I hold their Visa, but it's become rather meaningless. I think it's odd they even bother to have more than three groups given how most of their flights actually get boarded. The only plus to always getting Group 2 is that it usually means that, even with all those business travelers going first, there's enough room for my carry-on.
Yeah, it really depends on when you travel and between what cities but between/from a few it's pretty much pointless except for the overhead space. Monday morning, Thursday afternoon, etc from/to cities like Chicago, NYC, Boston, DC, Atlanta, Dallas, etc pretty much pointless - you aren't going to get on the plane fast unless you have higher status. I stopped traveling nearly 2 years ago now, but still have some status and literally the only reason I find it useful is for the overhead space issues. I have pre-check (get it if you don't have it) so as long as the airport has it and it's open (F*ck LGA on this - they close the line at like 7pm - so dumb and there's pretty much no such thing as priority line at the American terminal anyway), the priority security line doesn't even matter anymore.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2340  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 11:55 PM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
I think Plan B and Plan C for these parcels was always going to be less intensive and more residential, I expect they will acquiesce in part to the aldermen's demands for more park space. Other components like the soccer stadium only made sense in the context of a massive infrastructure package, which in turn only made sense in the context of a huge anchor tenant. TBH the North Branch parcels, given their relative lack of transit access, are better suited to low-rise multifamily and townhouse developments. We've seen almost no new supply of townhouses since the recession.

Maybe the North Branch as a whole can continue to develop office at the south end where train stations are reasonably walkable. The "River District" on the Tribune site and the O'Donnell project just north of it can attract office, they are a reasonable walk from the Blue Line and can easily run shuttles around the congestion to Union/Ogilvie with only a minor new road connection through the Blommer Chocolate property.

On the other hand, the 78 has the best transit access out of the various megaprojects, with the Red Line tracks literally right on site. If the construction cost of a new station doesn't literally destroy the city's budget.
If somebody put a gun to my head I'd say plan B was a more traditional office user but one that takes up less sq ft. Rebalance with more residential on the LP side of the project. Plan C could be basically all residential but with significant gives to get approvals, mid-rise and townhomes pretty much for sure given the attitude of the neighbors. I only rate the odds at LY better than most given it's rather prime position straddling Bucktown and Lincoln Park with the 808 going to run right through the middle.

Absent a mega-tenant like Amazon (or someone of near caliber) I'd expect office development to largely proceed as it has in River North, West Loop, Loop, and Fulton Market. Which I've got no problem with since diverse steady growth is really healthier in the long run.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Midwest
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:30 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.