HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2020, 8:47 PM
DCReid DCReid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,049
Will the pandemic reduce construction of office skyscrapers long-term

With many businesses encouraging employees to work at home and with the IT infrastructure in place to make home offices even more reliable and convenient,
will businesses decide that they really do not need thousands of square feet of offices in expensive cities like NY and SF? Or will office building continue but more old 'inefficient' offices be converted into other spaces, especially residential?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2020, 9:32 PM
10023's Avatar
10023 10023 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London
Posts: 21,146
Long term? No. But a lot of projects that don’t have shovels in the ground or at least financing in place are as good as dead.
__________________
There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there always has been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that "my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge." - Isaac Asimov
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2020, 9:50 PM
BG918's Avatar
BG918 BG918 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,549
I was talking to a colleague about this. We think this is a watershed moment for remote work and that it will become more prevalent after the pandemic. I work for a development/construction company and a significant portion of our workforce works on project sites. However the office work can be done remotely and starting tomorrow the office will be closed and all work done remotely. It remains to be seen if the jobsites will shut down.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2020, 9:58 PM
SIGSEGV's Avatar
SIGSEGV SIGSEGV is offline
He/his/him. >~<, QED!
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Loop, Chicago
Posts: 5,991
I don't know about that, remote work sucks in a lot of ways. It works well for some people but it's definitely not more productive for most. I think many people will find that it sucks that don't already know.
__________________
And here the air that I breathe isn't dead.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2020, 10:49 PM
BG918's Avatar
BG918 BG918 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,549
Quote:
Originally Posted by SIGSEGV View Post
I don't know about that, remote work sucks in a lot of ways. It works well for some people but it's definitely not more productive for most. I think many people will find that it sucks that don't already know.
Maybe it's a balance of both with companies supporting remote work days and employees sharing desks while "in the office". I know for me I am more productive when working away from the office, either at home or at a coffee shop (preferred). But I understand the value of actually being present especially when working with a team.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2020, 11:22 PM
jd3189 jd3189 is offline
An Optimistic Realist
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Loma Linda, CA / West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 5,571
Decentralization is probably a good compromise between the two. It doesn’t have to be like the suburban office parks in the 80s-00s, but having more regional centers for employment instead of putting all your eggs in one basket in a few cities that already have trouble with their limits. For all the positivity that goes with centralization, one fuck up in New York or the Bay Area can fuck up a major part of the dominant industries that are mostly located in those places.
__________________
Working towards making American cities walkable again!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2020, 12:54 AM
mhays mhays is offline
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 19,748
Operational capabilities aren't centralized...that's mostly leadership and invention. Data centers, back offices, etc., can run most things, aided by limited central leadership and existing contingency plans.

As for working from home, I suspect we'll see a jump up, if only a small one. Working from home isn't easy or productive in many cases. Meanwhile, to the point about offices downsizing, when companies move or renovate they tend to go with denser offices...a lot of 150-200-sf vs. the old 250, half of that being common areas, circulation, etc. I've been expecting an overall office downsizing for years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2020, 2:20 AM
The North One's Avatar
The North One The North One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,489
No, most people don't like working from home in the first place or can't for certain reasons and are less productive or dont have all the tools they need.

The mass work from home idea has been a thing for how many decades now? Corona ain't changing this.
__________________
Spawn of questionable parentage!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2020, 2:29 AM
dubu's Avatar
dubu dubu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: bend oregon
Posts: 1,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by The North One View Post
No, most people don't like working from home in the first place or can't for certain reasons and are less productive or dont have all the tools they need.

The mass work from home idea has been a thing for how many decades now? Corona ain't changing this.
most people like waking up early and being stuck in traffic for hours? everyone i talk to say they wish they worked from home.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2020, 2:31 AM
BG918's Avatar
BG918 BG918 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,549
Quote:
Originally Posted by The North One View Post
No, most people don't like working from home in the first place or can't for certain reasons and are less productive or dont have all the tools they need.

The mass work from home idea has been a thing for how many decades now? Corona ain't changing this.
FWIW this is the exact opposite of anyone I know.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2020, 2:37 AM
MonkeyRonin's Avatar
MonkeyRonin MonkeyRonin is offline
¥ ¥ ¥
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 9,872
Yeah, I don't that it'll spur a big rise in working from home post-pandemic. Companies are doing this because they have to, but I think most will find that productivity suffers as a result (to be fair, there's also a lot more going on - eg. parents have to deal with both work and looking after their kids).

Like most people that I know that get to work from home are treating this as a kind of semi-vacation. As is, I find working from home is mostly just a thing on slower days (usually a Friday) or on days where a person can't otherwise make it into the office (snow days, sickness, etc).
__________________
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2020, 4:36 AM
austlar1 austlar1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Austin
Posts: 3,428
I have a sinking feeling that the office building boom is over for a good little while, but that's because I believe we are on the precipice of a real depression rather than a simple recession. I just hope the buildings currently under construction (office and residential) are completed. It would be morale busting to look at stalled out partially completed buildings. They were a common sight in the early years of the Great Depression. Even construction on the Empire State Building was halted for a year or so. Ditto Rockefeller Center.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2020, 4:41 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is online now
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,696
If they lock down the nation for a while, will definitely see delays in time tables but I don't think it will be for long. Once this settles, I think the market will bounce back. Large spikes too, as life returns to normal.

In the acute sense, oh yeah... the damage is very very real.

The folks that will lose money are those that sell in a panic with respect to the market. Or if they invest in smaller emerging companies that don't have the resources or contingency plans for a prolong period of inactivity.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2020, 4:54 AM
austlar1 austlar1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Austin
Posts: 3,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris08876 View Post
If they lock down the nation for a while, will definitely see delays in time tables but I don't think it will be for long. Once this settles, I think the market will bounce back. Large spikes too, as life returns to normal.

In the acute sense, oh yeah... the damage is very very real.

The folks that will lose money are those that sell in a panic with respect to the market. Or if they invest in smaller emerging companies that don't have the resources or contingency plans for a prolong period of inactivity.
This is not just about a bunch of 401Ks. Corporate credit crunch is likely to derail banking system that already has liquidity problems. Major debtor corporations may default on corporate bonds as revenue declines rapidly due to shutdown. Consumers will be hard pressed to spend us out of this hole. Probably 60 % of American households will start sinking in debt as soon as layoffs kick in. It will be a while before they are able to get back to the table. This thing is shutting down the global economy. That has never ever happened in peacetime in modern times. I'd love to be wrong, but I think folks are whistling in the dark right now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2020, 5:07 AM
mhays mhays is offline
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 19,748
We appear to be heading toward expanded unemployment benefits. That would ease things substantially. That wouldn't cover people on reduced hours or tips of course, or the self-employed. Stimulus packages are also pending.

Otherwise, while we're cutting off big chunks of corporate and consumer spending, we're also adding other chunks, like investing in healthcare. People with steady incomes might spend less in the short term but that part will snap back to normal when possible.

I'm having a hard time predicting this. It'll be down but the "how" and "how much" are unclear.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2020, 5:16 AM
austlar1 austlar1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Austin
Posts: 3,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhays View Post
We appear to be heading toward expanded unemployment benefits. That would ease things substantially. That wouldn't cover people on reduced hours or tips of course, or the self-employed. Stimulus packages are also pending.

Otherwise, while we're cutting off big chunks of corporate and consumer spending, we're also adding other chunks, like investing in healthcare. People with steady incomes might spend less in the short term but that part will snap back to normal when possible.

I'm having a hard time predicting this. It'll be down but the "how" and "how much" are unclear.
Unemployment for the gig economy and 1099 folks?? How is that going to work? The Fed just shot it's wad. Nobody really knows what kind of stressors are operative in the banking realm. Supposedly the bond markets are behaving very strangely. Not enough buyers or liquidity for all kinds of debt that keeps the system afloat. I just don't see this as a one-off quick turnaround event. It is historic and structural. All the fissures in the global economy are going to be revealed. Monday is looking to be a blowout of the worst kind for stocks, bonds, and energy prices.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-g...-idUSKBN2121BM

Last edited by austlar1; Mar 16, 2020 at 6:56 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2020, 12:10 PM
montréaliste montréaliste is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Chambly, Quebec
Posts: 1,996
Quote:
Originally Posted by austlar1 View Post
I have a sinking feeling that the office building boom is over for a good little while, but that's because I believe we are on the precipice of a real depression rather than a simple recession. I just hope the buildings currently under construction (office and residential) are completed. It would be morale busting to look at stalled out partially completed buildings. They were a common sight in the early years of the Great Depression. Even construction on the Empire State Building was halted for a year or so. Ditto Rockefeller Center.
Nah, sorry. Both the ESB and the Rockefeller Center rammed through the early days of the depression. The ESB was built in 13 months and the Rockefeller was built in many phases but never halted for extraneous circumstances.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2020, 12:39 PM
JManc's Avatar
JManc JManc is online now
Dryer lint inspector
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Houston/ SF Bay Area
Posts: 37,785
The Empire State Building sat empty for years and didn't become profitable until 1950; almost 20 years later.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2020, 1:41 PM
montréaliste montréaliste is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Chambly, Quebec
Posts: 1,996
Quote:
Originally Posted by JManc View Post
The Empire State Building sat empty for years and didn't become profitable until 1950; almost 20 years later.
Yes, but there was no work stoppage. If anything, that thing flew by without anyone noticing. Besides, they built it at the very start of the Great Depression, and the ESB and Rockefeller contributed to a glut in office space, obviously.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2020, 1:50 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is offline
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 29,634
before all of this insanity, Hines was due to start construction on a new large office tower here in chicago this spring. with anchor tenant Salesforce already signed on, it is proposed to be ~1.5M SF and 835' tall.

we've heard that financing has already been lined up, and with Hines, that's generally a pretty safe bet under normal circumstances, but we are no longer under normal circumstances.

it will be very interesting to see what happens with this one in the coming weeks/months. it could be the canary in a coal mine.

__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.

Last edited by Steely Dan; Mar 16, 2020 at 5:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:56 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.